Coaching wins | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Coaching wins

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tara and Geno within 2 !

As of the morning of 1/29:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 18 = 998 (nxt: 1/29 @WA, 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 12 = 987 (nxt: 1/29 NCSt, .... ... 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 1/29 Nw , 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 20 = 975 (nxt: .... ..... 2/1 @Tmp, 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 17 = 974 (nxt: .... ..... 2/1, .... 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/10 Col)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/7 @Cin)
  • GA ties Htchll -- AAC Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
 
Tara within 1 !

As of the morning of 1/30:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: .... .... 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 20 = 975 (nxt: 2/1 @Tmp, 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 17 = 974 (nxt: 2/1, .... 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/7 @Cin)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
 
Tara within 1 !

As of the morning of 1/30:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: .... .... 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 20 = 975 (nxt: 2/1 @Tmp, 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 17 = 974 (nxt: 2/1, .... 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/7 @Cin)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)

And Tara really earned #999. A truly stellar coaching job back into the game in the second half.
 
As of the morning of 2/2:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: . 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 21 = 976 (nxt: . 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 18 = 975 (nxt: . 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/5 Tulsa)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
 
As of the morning of 2/2:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: . 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 21 = 976 (nxt: . 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 18 = 975 (nxt: . 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/5 Tulsa)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
Thanks for updating your win projections. Thought I'd add the following:
Tara is on schedule to complete the season with about 1010 wins; GA 993 if Uconn remains undefeated and wins the national championship, Hatchell at or near the current season winning percentage 993 - 998; and Muffett McGraw over 850 wins.
 
Last edited:
As of the morning of 2/2:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC , 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: . 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: 2/2 @Ia , ..... ... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 21 = 976 (nxt: . 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 18 = 975 (nxt: . 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/5 Tulsa)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
Really wonderful job following these coaching wins this season. Great idea, superb presentation, excellent follow through. I read these everyday you post them. Thanks for the hard work and commitment.
 
.-.
Tara can hit 1000 tmow and Geno can tie CVS on Sunday!

As of the morning of 2/3:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 19 = 999 (nxt: 2/3 USC, 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: . 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: ..... ..... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 21 = 976 (nxt: . 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 18 = 975 (nxt: . 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • Tara hits 1000 -- 2/03 USC .(My guess: 2/3 USC)
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/5 Tulsa)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
 
Gonna be strange when Vanderveer breaks Summit's record first.
 
In looking at the numbers, Geno will most likely catch and pass Hatchell. He's 12 wins behind and if UConn makes to FF 16 more wins (18 for NC) and Hatchell will be pressed to to win more than 4 games this year. Also in looking at the number of games Geno has won over the past 3 seasons compared to Tara, he has a real chance to bear her. He is only 23 behind her and he outpaced her by more than that. Just sayin...
 
Also in looking at the number of games Geno has won over the past 3 seasons compared to Tara, he has a real chance to bear her. He is only 23 behind her and he outpaced her by more than that. Just sayin...

He can pass TVV, but not likely before she passes Summitt, if that matters.
 
He can pass TVV, but not likely before she passes Summitt, if that matters.

Too soon to say. In 2014-15, Geno won 13 more games than TVV. In 2015-16, it was 12.

The current gap is 23.
 
.-.
Too soon to say. In 2014-15, Geno won 13 more games than TVV. In 2015-16, it was 12.

The current gap is 23.

If VanDerveer can return her program to perennial 30-win status, it will be very difficult for Auriemma to catch up to her before they both reach Summitt's mark. Stanford is in a conference that may be the most competitive in the country, with ORST, Wash, AZST, UCLA, as well as Cal, USC and very soon, OR (w/Ionescu). And Auriemma is going into the next couple of seasons with what looks on paper to be a monster team - scary good. At any rate, the 2019-2020 season is shaping up to find both of these coaches reaching 1100 wins!
 
Projecting from the last 5 years data, the numbers say Geno beats Tara to 1099 by an eyelash.

Wins needed: Stanford 100; UConn 123

Data over 5 years, including this year (Stanford at 18-3, UConn at 20-0)
Wins: Stanford 137; Uconn 171
Winning percentage: Stanford .830; UConn .972

Projecting through this season

Total games: Stanford 180.0; UConn 192.9
Games per year: Stanford 36.0; UConn 38.6
Wins per year: Stanford 29.9; UConn 37.5

Years to 1099 (wins needed/wins per year): Stanford 3.35; UConn 3.28
 
BY (myself included) have (collective noun plural verb is probably correct) always appreciated Tara's altruism during the 1995-96 season. Only if we could get her to acknowledge doing a job on Rebecca Lobo simultaneously.
I too do not like the practice of getting credit for a win that one did not coach. If yelling would fix it, I would very gladly do it as well.

I wonder if you knew that CD coached a few games and Geno has been credited with the victories. Why don't you let charity begin at home.

What is the "job" that Tara did on Lobo on the Olympic team???
 
Projecting from the last 5 years data, the numbers say Geno beats Tara to 1099 by an eyelash.

Wins needed: Stanford 100; UConn 123

Data over 5 years, including this year (Stanford at 18-3, UConn at 20-0)
Wins: Stanford 137; Uconn 171
Winning percentage: Stanford .830; UConn .972

Projecting through this season

Total games: Stanford 180.0; UConn 192.9
Games per year: Stanford 36.0; UConn 38.6
Wins per year: Stanford 29.9; UConn 37.5

Years to 1099 (wins needed/wins per year): Stanford 3.35; UConn 3.28

This could make for some interesting media buzz if both are approaching Pat at the same time.
 
In contemplating the race to 1,000 and 1,098 wins, it's worth acknowledging that Tara forwent an entire season's worth of collegiate wins in order to coach the Olympic team. The distance between her and Geno would be much wider if she hadn't.
 
.-.
What is the "job" that Tara did on Lobo on the Olympic team???
Tara had already been working with the core of the Olympic team when Lobo graduated and was added, presumably against Tara's wishes. She ended up not playing Lobo many minutes in the whole tournament. The reality was probably that Lobo wasn't as ready for the team as the other players, not unlike Sue's first Olympics. But Lobo was at that moment the most famous women's player, so a strange situation all around.
 
In contemplating the race to 1,000 and 1,098 wins, it's worth acknowledging that Tara forwent an entire season's worth of collegiate wins in order to coach the Olympic team. The distance between her and Geno would be much wider if she hadn't.
She has also coached NCAA WBB for several more years than Geno has.
 
This could make for some interesting media buzz if both are approaching Pat at the same time.
Could, should, and most likely will generate significant buzz. A story line that links the three most iconic programs in the sport with the drama of a chase.
 
I like the way this focus has occurred as it rightly looks at Tara, Geno and Pat. We just need to move on past CVS and Hatchell. I respect these ladies and far be it for to tell them to hang up the whistle, it does appear time has past them bye. My sympathies lie more towards CVS sticking around than Hatchell due the the stink of a scandal at UNC and the academic fraud that occurred. Maybe that's why I want Geno to pass Hatchel this year and be done with her in the rear view. Anyway, I am happy for Tara and still think she is coaching effectively. My hat is off to you TVv (or is it TVV?).
 
All of these coaches were part of the rise of WCBB and should be thanked. Regardless of how you feel about some of these coaches, they were pioneers for the game it has become today. Of the top 5 is Stringer the only one without a NC?
 
Of the top 5 is Stringer the only one without a NC?
Yes.
Stevens has won a D2 title, and Conradt won, so she's the only one in the top 7 w/o a NC.
But Jim Foster is 8th, and just 23 behind Conradt, and he also has no NC. Nor does #9 (Selvig) or #10 (Landers), but Muffet will move into 9th next year.
 
.-.
Congrats Tara!

As of the morning of 2/4:
  1. Summitt . 1098
  2. Tara ..... 980 + 20 =1000 (nxt: 2/6 UCLA, 2/10 Col, 2/12 UT)
  3. Hatchell . 975 + 13 = 988 (nxt: 2/5 @Clm, 2/9 BC,.. 2/12 @Syr)
  4. Stringer . 971 + 06 = 977 (nxt: ... ..... 2/8 Ind , 2/11 @MN)
  5. Geno ..... 955 + 21 = 976 (nxt: 2/5 TLSA, 2/7 @Cin, 2/11 SMU)
  6. Stevens .. 957 + 18 = 975 (nxt: 2/4, .... 2/8, .... 2/11)
  7. Conradt .. 900

Earliest these could happen:
  • TaraV ties PHS -- 2019-20 season
  • Hatchell @1000 -- Postseason (My guess: not this year)
  • GenoA ties CVS -- 2/05 Tlsa (My guess: 2/5 Tulsa)
  • GA ties Htchll -- NCAA Trnmt (My guess: NCAAs)
 
V0t6PdI.jpg
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,359
Messages
4,567,634
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom