- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 20,241
- Reaction Score
- 116,037
Thanks. So 34 is the only one off the board. UConn's criteria for retiring numbers is enshrinement into the Hall of Fame.
Thanks. So 34 is the only one off the board. UConn's criteria for retiring numbers is enshrinement into the Hall of Fame.
tasty.Here's what we (at least I) don't know...
Is Donovan Catholic? If so, will that impact his decision to attend a Catholic vs private vs state school?
Does he have strong feelings about a rural vs suburban vs urban setting?
Large vs small? Ohio State at one extreme, PC at the other.
How important is it for his family and friends to be within close proximity? He has opted for his senior year at Bristol Central instead of prep school. Is that foreshadowing?
Just some food for thought.
Here's what we (at least I) don't know...
Is Donovan Catholic? If so, will that impact his decision to attend a Catholic vs private vs state school?
Does he have strong feelings about a rural vs suburban vs urban setting?
Large vs small? Ohio State at one extreme, PC at the other.
How important is it for his family and friends to be within close proximity? He has opted for his senior year at Bristol Central instead of prep school. Is that foreshadowing?
Just some food for thought.
Emeka was not top 100, but was rising, when he committed to UConn in April of his Senior year.Bruh. Ain’t nobody got time for that.
Hit me with the cliff notes of that dissertation.
with no official visits taken yet, doubtful they know more than which way the "warm" wind is blowing, and you dont need a weatherman to tell you thatIm not usually one to look at red herrings, but 247 has UConn as warmer and I feel that they have too much merit to ignore it. Has anyone heard of anything recently?
Im not usually one to look at red herrings, but 247 has UConn as warmer and I feel that they have too much merit to ignore it. Has anyone heard of anything recently?
View attachment 67125
Home court advantage?Im not usually one to look at red herrings, but 247 has UConn as warmer and I feel that they have too much merit to ignore it. Has anyone heard of anything recently?
Probably basing it off the location and visits to the school.Im not usually one to look at red herrings, but 247 has UConn as warmer and I feel that they have too much merit to ignore it. Has anyone heard of anything recently?
View attachment 67125
It is not easy to play zone defenseI mean it's okay if we don't want to be a team that goes zone. I don't love it, but I get creating that team identity. There are other ways to protect bigs from foul trouble or guys that can't defend someone 1v1
It is not easy to play zone defense
It takes a different kind of awareness than sheer hustle and working through screeens. It requires awareness of passing lanes, player movements and anticipation. It actually requires a higher BB IQ . Done well, it can turn the ball over very effectively.It is not easy to play zone defense
That was my point earlier. It's not easy to play zone defenseIt takes a different kind of awareness than sheer hustle and working through screeens. It requires awareness of passing lanes, player movements and anticipation. It actually requires a higher BB IQ . Done well, it can turn the ball over very effectively.
That was my point earlier. It's not easy to play zone defense
with no official visits taken yet, doubtful they know more than which way the "warm" wind is blowing, and you dont need a weatherman to tell you that
It takes a different kind of awareness than sheer hustle and working through screeens. It requires awareness of passing lanes, player movements and anticipation. It actually requires a higher BB IQ . Done well, it can turn the ball over very effectively.
In our best shot blocking years, the defense actually funneled guards by them into shotblockers. It worked so well. Marcus Williams loved this, especially since he couldn't keep guys in front of him. This was also an era where guys can't shoot like they do now and there was maybe 2 guys on a team that were a big threat from deep. Now many teams have 5 players on the court at the same time who are a shooting threat.Indeed. There is a reason Syracuse wanted Andre Jackson. And a reason we played so much zone back in 1989-90 with guys who were great at that. But I don't remember any Calhoun teams that couldn't switch in and out of man and zone as needed during games. It's a tool that ought to be in our toolbox.
In all those years we lead the nation in shot blocking, I don't recall Calhoun sending his bigs out to hard hedge. I'm sure Hurley will figure it out, but too often last year we got burned in the paint because we didn't have a rim protector.
Indeed. There is a reason Syracuse wanted Andre Jackson. And a reason we played so much zone back in 1989-90 with guys who were great at that. But I don't remember any Calhoun teams that couldn't switch in and out of man and zone as needed during games. It's a tool that ought to be in our toolbox.
In all those years we lead the nation in shot blocking, I don't recall Calhoun sending his bigs out to hard hedge. I'm sure Hurley will figure it out, but too often last year we got burned in the paint because we didn't have a rim protector.
In our best shot blocking years, the defense actually funneled guards by them into shotblockers. It worked so well. Marcus Williams loved this, especially since he couldn't keep guys in front of him. This was also an era where guys can't shoot like they do now and there was maybe 2 guys on a team that were a big threat from deep. Now many teams have 5 players on the court at the same time who are a shooting threat.
I agree that zone should be used in certain situations and needs to be in the toolbox.
I get that the game has changed, but I think Hurley focuses too much on defending mediocre outside shooter, and sacrifices interior defense. If you've got 5 shooters, 2 of them are probably not guys you need to focus on outside (on our team, think Whaley, Akok). Let them take those shots. These aren't NBA shooters. Because what I saw all year was that the open 3s against us came because a wing defender was having to rotate back outside from covering the paint and was late. So sending the 5 out hurt our 3 point shot defense.
I also think it's harder to take the 3 point shot away. Guys make them whether defended or not. But the paint? You have a long roster like ours and you can make the paint very, very inhospitable.
Or going pro.Hopefully she’s not considering entering the transfer portal.
But you were "playing" 7 others? 🤔🙄Why would he even be releasing a top 8 if he’s sold on us? I knew I was going to marry my wife early on.
Columbus and Providence have done well in the Underrated Cities thread.Some other stuff I haven't seen mentioned
Steve Pikiel is from Bristol, Juwan Howard and Patrick Ewing were NBA Big men.
Nate Laszweski on Notre Dame went to Avon HS for a year - no idea if they have any connection
Define Casual FanRutgers is more in this than most casual fans realize. Where is their head coach from?
BMI > 25 (even the majority of them that are insanely ripped super-athletes)Define Casual Fan
Not chiefDefine Casual Fan
So you get a 7’1-2” rim protector, and you expect him to guard at 30’. Sounds like he’ll be at Michigan for sure.We hard hedge, so bigs needs to be super mobile sliding on the perimeter. That's why Whaley (with the body of a PF) is so effective defending at the 5 for us in the hedge... lack of size is also why he struggles against traditional bigs. It's also why Sanogo (and presumably Clingan would also) really struggled with it.
Because we hard hedge so much, it's actually our 4s and 3s that should be elite shot-blockers. Because of the double team up top, they end up helping a lot. Akok racked up a TON of blocks in the help that way, and I think we're probably hoping Johnson can do the same. Sid Wilson did a decent job in his minutes there too.