There new starting PG is 5 8, they are worse.
The Cavs bench with Jae Crowder and Derrick Rose should be better, no? At least they've improved there.
Turning Marcus Thorton into IT was not a win? Trading Troy Bell for Perkins was not a win? Turning Chucky Atkins and Chris Mihm into the pick which was used on Rondo was not a win? Trading Jeff Green and Wally for Ray Allen and Glen Davis was not a win?Brad brought in Hayward. Don't steal his win to give it to the guy who is still living off 2007 and one trade with Brooklyn.
The recent espn article about the rebuilding of the celtics...danny really only won like 2 trades on the entire list. Granted it was the big ones, but this one is bad.
C's favorite in East, have to be
Great move, makes them immediate favorite
Turning Marcus Thorton into IT was not a win? Trading Troy Bell for Perkins was not a win? Turning Chucky Atkins and Chris Mihm into the pick which was used on Rondo was not a win? Trading Jeff Green and Wally for Ray Allen and Glen Davis was not a win?
Are you JSMs brother?
ESPN is the worst sports recourse for good analysis, do yourself a favor find someone else to be brainwashed by.
Crowder should start.
With Lebron the 2/3 are basically interchangeable.
Boston is 2/1 to win the East, Wizards are 10/1.Absolutely not.. Cavs are still the best team in the East.. I think the Wizards are even better on paper now, since the Cs gave up their 2 best defenders in Crowder and Bradley. Boston is relying a lot now on Jaylen Brown (good player but not a guy you wanna be hanging your hat on) and Tatum (will be good I think but again, not a guy you wanna be relying on in the playoffs at this point)
Boston is 2/1 to win the East, Wizards are 10/1.
So the article is bad and pointless. Cool, thanks for sharing it.Did you not see I mentioned an article that started with about 2014? So bringing in stuff from 2003 or 2004 does nothing.
Absolutely not.. Cavs are still the best team in the East.. I think the Wizards are even better on paper now, since the Cs gave up their 2 best defenders in Crowder and Bradley. Boston is relying a lot now on Jaylen Brown (good player but not a guy you wanna be hanging your hat on) and Tatum (will be good I think but again, not a guy you wanna be relying on in the playoffs at this point)
So the article is bad and pointless. Cool, thanks for sharing it.
2 biggest trades which can be judged since 2014 are turning Marcus Thorton into IT. WIN. And turning Rondo into Crowder. Win.
No the point was about THIS rebuild.
Which is relevant. You just choose to ignore it.
Danny has made a lot of trades. When he wins he wins big, but doesn't win nearly as often as we think, and he got hammered on this one.
Trade is a nearly a wash to me. I give the slight edge to the Cavs because of Crowder and the draft pick (which they will screw up). Neither team can beat Golden State, but if the Knicks do the smart thing and buy out Melo...
Last season
Kyrie: 47.3% FG, 40.1% 3PT, 5.8 Dimes, PER of 23
IT: 46.3 FG, 37.9%, 5.9 Dimes, PER 26....and he wasn't playing off Lebron.
That is at best a wash to me because of the Lebron factor. Nether is a good defender, though IT shows a little more effort.
Another post with zero analysis and facts and the regurgitation of the opinion of an ESPN writer. Thank you for your contribution.No the point was about THIS rebuild.
Which is relevant. You just choose to ignore it.
Danny has made a lot of trades. When he wins he wins big, but doesn't win nearly as often as we think, and he got hammered on this one.
Ainge got taken behind the woodshed by a GM with less than a month on the job.
IT is 5' 9 and Kyrie is 6' 1 how are people overlooking this?
Because they are both only good at scoring and his height hasn't stopped him from doing so in high volume. His height is only and issue on Defense, and if you think that give Kyrie and advantage.....you have never seen him play defense. He is turrrible.
By the way, Kyrie is 6'3". And he is still a bad defender.
You think the Celts are the loser on this trade?
His height has affected him greatly in the playoffs. There is a reason why his shooting percentages drop significantly and his turnovers increase.Because they are both only good at scoring and his height hasn't stopped him from doing so in high volume. His height is only and issue on Defense, and if you think that give Kyrie and advantage.....you have never seen him play defense. He is turrrible.
By the way, Kyrie is 6'3". And he is still a bad defender.
Because they are both only good at scoring and his height hasn't stopped him from doing so in high volume. His height is only and issue on Defense, and if you think that give Kyrie and advantage.....you have never seen him play defense. He is turrrible.
By the way, Kyrie is 6'3". And he is still a bad defender.
You can't have IT in the PnR at all can he even be on the court v. the Warriors? You can hide Kyrie on defense but how do you hide IT?