- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 8,885
- Reaction Score
- 18,182
Hey, I'm not being bitchy about it, just curious. I like the rule to an extent, I just don't know exactly where the line is.
And again, I'm happy to be wrong. And support whatever the guys who run this thing say. I'm just a mug.
I'm confused that if you have information directly from a source and you choose to censor it, don't people end up less informed and more prone to speculation? I generally like to err on the side of more information but realize lines have to be drawn because of a small percentage who would act in an irresponsible or detrimental way. On the other hand we seem to give ourselves a lot of credit for being able to impact the direction of the program by sharing our opinions which are usually a mixture of fact and fiction. It's up to everyone inside and outside the program to exercise a healthy skepticism of anything they read on any message board. Most times, highly skeptical or unsourced information is called out by other posters anyway and tends to have a short shelf life.