Thanks to the people taking this thread seriously, because it is one of the best topics discussed here in a couple of years. I wrote this thing on the fly today and tried to copy it in. I apologize for the font, which is awful. Anyway, a few thoughts, for whatever they are worth:
Some of what I'm thinking came out of a previous post entitled "This team just doesn't have it," a well-reasoned argument by a loyal fan that while UConn is a wonderful team and it's a great accomplishment to be $3 in the country, it still is #3 and unlikely to advance further than that this year.
So what happens if you take that argument (assuming you agree, and I do) and run with it? For example, what will next year be like? Well, UConn will not have enough players. That much is clear. They are getting a top=notch guard, and boy could they use more guards. But if someone goes down with an injury, as inevitably happens, the team will find its hardest 3-4 games very difficult to win. Just look what happened this year. UConn loses its second game against ND and people immediately suggest that things would have been different if Brianna Banks were playing. They may well be right, but think about it. You are the #3 team in the country, recruiting All Americans from all over, with the best coach in women's basketball, and you need the presence of a player who until this year was simply not a factor?
What will next year be like? It will not be pretty. UConn will win the games it is supposed to, often by staggering amounts, and will struggle mightily against the other 3-6 teams.
And what will it look like down the road? UConn will get some top-notch recruits, but despite Geno's statements (what's he going to say, after all?), its presence in The League With No Name will hurt his chances to consistently bring in the best. I doubt there will be any more UConn classes like the Fab Five combo of a few years ago.
So here's something to think about, Boneyarders, something raised by another poster: Nothing ever stays the same. Could it be that women's basketball, like most everything else, is going to run in cycles, and that UConn is the next Tennessee? That it is the Last Old Thing, and that other teams -- Baylor, maybe, or Notre Dame -- are the Next New Things? And speaking of ND, it's not like they are standing still next year. Don't they have some recruits coming in?
There are several factors that argue for this cycle theory, as much as we may not like to think about them. First is the league situation. Yes, UConn may some day get into the ACC or some other legitimate league, but the damage may be done by then.
Also, there are more top-quality recruits, and they are being spread farther around the basketball universe. Let's face it: In spite of protestations to the contrary and in spite of picking up a fine recruit, UConn got its clock cleaned in the last recruiting class. North Carolina is apparently a first-rate recruiting stop in spite of its second rate coach. North Carolina? Seriously? Seems that way. I’m afraid that this may be the new reality, and maybe UConn recovers, adapts and does just as well as ever, and maybe it becomes as irrelevant as Louisiana Tech.