- Joined
- Sep 26, 2016
- Messages
- 1,063
- Reaction Score
- 1,426
Who is Wallace?I'd take gabby at 2 and nurse at 9.
Always wondered why Wallace is never on any of these mock drafts.
Should be at least a second rounder imo.
Musina should be higher than 36.
Who is Wallace?I'd take gabby at 2 and nurse at 9.
Always wondered why Wallace is never on any of these mock drafts.
Should be at least a second rounder imo.
Musina should be higher than 36.
Z better improve her game. She seems very soft. Draft must be weak. Thank goodness UConn saves her from Duke. What a terrific move for her development. Now Odom at Duke is looking good. Watch her.I notice Natalie Butler as a second round pick, which I love.
Z would be the #2 pick if she was in this year's draft.
There’s a reason nobody has yet to sign Ivory Latta as a free agent this year, and she even has some PG skills. Small players are a defensive liability in the WNBA. If a player is small, they need to make up for that lack of height in a big way. If Johnson has no PG skills, it’s going to be tough for her. Liked the rest of your post though.
According to this Gabby and Diamond to Sky.
This thread has me wondering: Who was the last (recruited) scholarship player who completed four years at UConn and didn't get drafted?
Heather Buck?
Who before her?
You may be right. Wonder how Geno would have coached her?Wonder how Gabby would handle playing with an ego-case like DD? I think DD will flame out. Wouldn't go near that kid in the draft.
Bad joss!!!!
That’s a pretty strong recruiting pitch if Heather was the last 4 yr player not to be draftedDid Heather become a nurse as planned?
That’s true. Maya transformed the Lynx organization from Day 1. Maya is going to be the greatest of all time. Is Gabby at the Maya level?
Look I will not be surprised if Gabby is not taken in the first six picks. Furthermore I would not be shocked if Kia was picked before Gabby. Why? Because Gabby is as Sue Bird said a tweener. She has no position in the WNBA. What she does for UCONN, I don’t believe is possible to do in the WNBA. Her athleticism won’t be as distinct as it is in college. She is a bit of a project. Is some coach going to change his/her system for a player who is not a transformative player such as Moore or Stewart? I believe not. So she must fit into an existing system. She must develop a better jump shot particularly from the 3pt line. Can she be as effective in the paint in a league known for physical contact? How high can she jump when a big body is on her? Now I am not saying she is terrible. Quite the opposite. I am trying look at her as if I were a WNBA coach and/or GM who has a top six pick. Do I expend a top 6 pick on a developmental project irrespective of the potential or select a more complete player who can more easily blend into my existing system?That’s a pretty strong recruiting pitch if Heather was the last 4 yr player not to be drafted
Minor corrections: Boykin was 2015. Edwards transferred out of 2014.Doty wasn’t drafted either. UCONN players seem to excel if they stay, or they transfer:
2009-Faris, excelled
2010-Dolson/Hartley excelled, Walker, Engeln, and Johnson all transferred
2011-KML excelled, Stokes did okay but hit her stride in the pros, Banks transferred
2012-Stewart, Jefferson and Tuck excelled
2013-Chong exceeded expectations and had played in the pros
2014-Nurse and Williams excelled, Ekmark and Boykin transferred
2015-Collier and KLS have excelled
2016-Dangerfield has excelled, Irwin and Bent have not. Players are still sophomores.
2017-none have excelled...all are still in their first year. AEH transferred.
Players from the 2009-15 classes, 6 of the 19 players transferred. Besides maybe Stokes, the other 13 all made huge strides and were far better players when they left UCONN. Too early to say if the 2016 and 2017 classes will remain in tact the next few years. Seems like in most instances, the writing was on the wall for players who left. They knew they weren’t going to make an impact at UCONN, so they opted to choose a program where they could get PT. Natalie Butler, Ekmark and Michaela Johnson are all great examples of this.
Very talented 1st round. If Kia is available to the Sun, I just don't know how they could pass on her... and, although I don't believe in drafting UConn players to pander to UConn fans, I would be completely on board.
Who is Wallace?
Doty wasn’t drafted either. UCONN players seem to excel if they stay, or they transfer:
2009-Faris, excelled
2010-Dolson/Hartley excelled, Walker, Engeln, and Johnson all transferred
2011-KML excelled, Stokes did okay but hit her stride in the pros, Banks transferred
2012-Stewart, Jefferson and Tuck excelled
2013-Chong exceeded expectations and had played in the pros
2014-Nurse and Williams excelled, Ekmark and Boykin transferred
2015-Collier and KLS have excelled
2016-Dangerfield has excelled, Irwin and Bent have not. Players are still sophomores.
2017-none have excelled...all are still in their first year. AEH transferred.
Players from the 2009-15 classes, 6 of the 19 players transferred. Besides maybe Stokes, the other 13 all made huge strides and were far better players when they left UCONN. Too early to say if the 2016 and 2017 classes will remain in tact the next few years. Seems like in most instances, the writing was on the wall for players who left. They knew they weren’t going to make an impact at UCONN, so they opted to choose a program where they could get PT. Natalie Butler, Ekmark and Michaela Johnson are all great examples of this.
Didn't we have a kid from Connecticut who played four years, but wasn't drafted and whose objective was becoming a doctor? Remember her?
I think you are referring to Briana Pulito, aka "Polly". She was not initially a scholarship player and was not recruited while in high school. She was initially a walk-on and then got a scholarship. I think the question above is about scholarship players who were recruited by the coaches while they were in high school.Didn't we have a kid from Connecticut who played four years, but wasn't drafted and whose objective was becoming a doctor? Remember her?
Nicole Wolfe??
I think you are referring to Briana Pulito, aka "Polly". She was not initially a scholarship player and was not recruited while in high school. She was initially a walk-on and then got a scholarship. I think the question above is about scholarship players who were recruited by the coaches while they were in high school.
I notice Natalie Butler as a second round pick, which I love.
Z would be the #2 pick if she was in this year's draft.
Correct me on this. Didn’t Engeln and Johnson suck after they left?Doty wasn’t drafted either. UCONN players seem to excel if they stay, or they transfer:
2009-Faris, excelled
2010-Dolson/Hartley excelled, Walker, Engeln, and Johnson all transferred
2011-KML excelled, Stokes did okay but hit her stride in the pros, Banks transferred
2012-Stewart, Jefferson and Tuck excelled
2013-Chong exceeded expectations and had played in the pros
2014-Nurse and Williams excelled, Ekmark and Boykin transferred
2015-Collier and KLS have excelled
2016-Dangerfield has excelled, Irwin and Bent have not. Players are still sophomores.
2017-none have excelled...all are still in their first year. AEH transferred.
Players from the 2009-15 classes, 6 of the 19 players transferred. Besides maybe Stokes, the other 13 all made huge strides and were far better players when they left UCONN. Too early to say if the 2016 and 2017 classes will remain in tact the next few years. Seems like in most instances, the writing was on the wall for players who left. They knew they weren’t going to make an impact at UCONN, so they opted to choose a program where they could get PT. Natalie Butler, Ekmark and Michaela Johnson are all great examples of this.
Engeln had some problems at BC and didn’t finish her eligibility.Correct me on this. Didn’t Engeln and Johnson suck after they left?
Banks was nothing great after she left to PennState?
Boykin definitely nothing special currently at PennState?
Ekmark doing fine at Az St?
In the past few years only Ekmark and Edwards have done well as transfers to Power 5 schools. Neither great but good additions. I think overall UConn transfers have definitely underperformed. Fan bases have huge hopes because they are from UConn. I would overrate them too.
I think “decent” is accurate. She started much of the time, but wasn’t much of a scorer. I’m not sure if she made a pro team or not.What about Samarie Walker? Didn't she do decent at Kentucky after leaving UConn?
I think you’re right. I watched Gabby verse L’ville. Taken back by her all around athleticism and IQ. Also taken back her hesitancy and lack of confidence in her outside shot. Startling to see at this stage of her Sr year. That’s a glaring weakness on the WNBA level.What? This you don't know? Seriously!?Look I will not be surprised if Gabby is not taken in the first six picks. Furthermore I would not be shocked if Kia was picked before Gabby. Why? Because Gabby is as Sue Bird said a tweener. She has no position in the WNBA. What she does for UCONN, I don’t believe is possible to do in the WNBA. Her athleticism won’t be as distinct as it is in college. She is a bit of a project. Is some coach going to change his/her system for a player who is not a transformative player such as Moore or Stewart? I believe not. So she must fit into an existing system. She must develop a better jump shot particularly from the 3pt line. Can she be as effective in the paint in a league known for physical contact? How high can she jump when a big body is on her? Now I am not saying she is terrible. Quite the opposite. I am trying look at her as if I were a WNBA coach and/or GM who has a top six pick. Do I expend a top 6 pick on a developmental project irrespective of the potential or select a more complete player who can more easily blend into my existing system?
From what I’ve heard she was pretty good at KY. I had just started following WNBA 2013 her final semester.What about Samarie Walker? Didn't she do decent at Kentucky after leaving UConn?
Thanks I didn’t realize Johnson played well at Wisconsin. They must have been thrilled to land her. Too bad she was hurt.Engeln had some problems at BC and didn’t finish her eligibility.
Johnson actually did well at Wisconsin before getting injured again.
Edwards, Ekmark, and Boykin all became starters on so-so teams. Their numbers were decent, but they are not WNBA prospects. DJB is not a shooter or scorer, but she’s a pretty good rebounder.
Correct me on this. Didn’t Engeln and Johnson suck after they left?
Banks was nothing great after she left to PennState?
Boykin definitely nothing special currently at PennState?
Ekmark doing fine at Az St?
In the past few years only Ekmark and Edwards have done well as transfers to Power 5 schools. Neither great but good additions. I think overall UConn transfers have definitely underperformed. Fan bases have huge hopes because they are from UConn. I would overrate them too.
I believe so.Did Heather become a nurse as planned?
Correct me on this. Didn’t ... Johnson suck after they left?

