Mr. Hand
Whistleblower
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,966
- Reaction Score
- 9,579
The team's problems are easy to explain and nearly impossible to fix this season.
The elephant in the room is that we have one player who can consistently get in the lane, and that player is a freshman (with everything that being a freshman implies).
Ollie really overestimated what Sterling Gibbs was going to give us, and he wasn't the only one. I guess second team all Big East doesn't mean much these days, because a year later, he's not even honorable mention All AAC. You can try to put some of the blame for Gibb's lack of performance on the coaching staff, but I disagree. After watching him, I seriously have no idea how he managed to put up the numbers he did at Seton Hall. Must have had good teammates.
Some may say Daniel Hamilton is good enough to play a point forward; I was never impressed with Hamilton in that role. His penetration is soft, and his decisions are too often suspect. If he's playing point forward next year, we're a bubble team again.
Without an upper classman lead point guard who can create shots for others, this team's ceiling suddenly gets much, much lower. We have one guy who can score in the low post, and a bunch of streaky shooters who get turnover prone when forced to penetrate.
Alterique Gilbert and whatever guard Ollie signs this spring provide hope that next year may be better.
The elephant in the room is that we have one player who can consistently get in the lane, and that player is a freshman (with everything that being a freshman implies).
Ollie really overestimated what Sterling Gibbs was going to give us, and he wasn't the only one. I guess second team all Big East doesn't mean much these days, because a year later, he's not even honorable mention All AAC. You can try to put some of the blame for Gibb's lack of performance on the coaching staff, but I disagree. After watching him, I seriously have no idea how he managed to put up the numbers he did at Seton Hall. Must have had good teammates.
Some may say Daniel Hamilton is good enough to play a point forward; I was never impressed with Hamilton in that role. His penetration is soft, and his decisions are too often suspect. If he's playing point forward next year, we're a bubble team again.
Without an upper classman lead point guard who can create shots for others, this team's ceiling suddenly gets much, much lower. We have one guy who can score in the low post, and a bunch of streaky shooters who get turnover prone when forced to penetrate.
Alterique Gilbert and whatever guard Ollie signs this spring provide hope that next year may be better.