Maybe he was never that great? As others have said, he won with Jimmy C's players a few years back. I don't want to be a pessimist, but it's hard not to.
Why do we have to swing from one end of the spectrum to the other?
He can be great in 2013 and 2014 and regress in 2015 and 2016.
Why is that not possible?
I don't buy the Calhoun players argument. For one, Deandre Daniels hardly did anything under Calhoun. Two, Shabazz was ripped apart here his sophomore season, was deemed a problem child. Three, Boatright was in and out of the lineup his freshman year. Heck, Calhoun was in and out between his suspension and his illnesses. They were learning under George Blaney for crying out loud. And it wasn't pretty then either. Blaney was even more harshly blasted than Ollie is being blasted now.
In other words, though these players were landed by Calhoun (I don't know who recruited them), they surely all developed under Ollie in those 2 years, 2013-2014. Daniels, Napier, Boatright, and even a guy like Niels Giffey, improved under Ollie. Does anyone dispute this?
If the argument is that Calhoun landed more highly rated talent than Ollie, then that too is questionable. Is everyone completely forgetting what was said about these classes at the time?
Giffey, Napier, Boatright, were not overwhelming us with promise back then. You can find a ton of threads on this board about the horrible recruiting during Napier's sophomore season under Calhoun.
That 2014 team that won the national championship was Kevin Ollie's team. It is mind boggling that any other argument could even be made.
That being said, Ollie has lost control of this team and is not doing a fine coaching job at all. Maybe he has never experienced this kind of laziness and disfunction. Maybe these players don't have the drive of a Boatright/Napier. You could see the troubles on the very first offensive possession when they were totally discombobulated.