You are talking about recruiting though. If you defend his lack of defensive coachingby saying the players aren’t equipped to handle the competition, well then that falls on KO for bringing in guys who can’t play. How is this not understood?
Recruiting and coaching are two separate issues in the discussion
You have to be able to separate to understand the argument
I understand those of you who dislike the guy so much and want him gone asap can only see things through that vision - that's fine
If you defend his lack of defensive coaching
I never defended his lack of defensive coaching because you nor I know absolutely zilch about his coaching - we aren't there to witness it. He has had guys who could play D so you can't say he doesn't coach it. You can coach all you want but if you have guys who don't get it or you have kids going up against men it just doesn't work.
Is that a recruitment issue? - for sure. He has proven to be a less than adequate recruiter and bringing in Chills shows that someone recognized this fact
Chills is a proven recruiter but definitely not a proven X and Os guy or game coach. I'm not sure about his basketball IQ
In the end, I don't care if KO stays or KO leaves.
I feel strongly that the guy knows basketball, has worked for and with the brightest, most experienced minds in basketball history so he has soaked in a lot of tactics and techniques
The best will tell you that if you can't put on the floor guys who can match up physically with the opponent, you are at an extreme disadvantage.
UConn has been at a physical disadvantage for the past 3 or 4 years and that is on KO and he may pay for it at the end of this season