USA Basketball officials explain leaving Parker off Olympic team | Page 4 | The Boneyard

USA Basketball officials explain leaving Parker off Olympic team

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just for some perspective on NT team make-up and the 'rookie' slot:
1996 - Lobo - no pro experience (none of the team had any but she was the youngest at 22 by 2 years)
1998 - Holdsclaw - still in college, Wolters one year out of college
2000 - Holdsclaw - 1 yr pro
2002 - Bird - no pro experience, and Catchings 1 year pro.
2004 - Taurasi - no pro experience
2006 - Parker - still in college, Augustus 1 year pro
2008 - Fowles - no pro experience and Parker no pro experience
2010 - Moore - still in college and Charles no pro experience
2012 - Moore - 1 year pro
2014 - Stewart - still in college and Sims no pro experience
2016 - Stewart - no pro experience

Since a USA profession league was first being organized in 1996 there have been 10 NT competitions and in 8 of those teams there has been a player on the team with no pro experience and in the other 2 there has been a player with a single year of pro ball. In 4 of the 8 teams the player with no pro experience was still in college and three of those four times the player was a junior (Holdsclaw, Parker, and Stewart) - interesting to note all for of those years were WC years and not Olympics. In every one of those four instances that college player on the WC team has also been on the following Olympic team with no pro experience or in Moore's case a single year.

It is clear from the above tat USA basketball generally reserves one or sometimes two places for pre-professional or barely professional players, and I am sure that in each of those years there was a professional player with a stronger claim to be included than the 'rookie' and I am sure there was controversy about the rookie being included. Looking at the rookies that have been included with the exception of Lobo and Wolters who succumbed early to injuries and Holdsclaw whose personal issues exploded, the rest of the players have remain in the USA pool since their first selection.

Parker herself was twice selected to the NT over better and far more experienced professional players so can we please stop with the Stewart over Parker discussion - that isn't and never was the choice being made.

Tina Thompson herself was a starter on both of those teams by the way, and I wonder if she felt the committee/one person was destroying USA basketball at that time?
 
DaddyChoc said:
Parker was left off to make room for Stewie... in 2012 Stewie wasnt an issue so thats why CP3 was on the that team. AJones nor Cash should've made the teams they were on.
Expand ...

There was a decision made by USA Basketball before the Final Four that a collegian would be included on the Olympic team and Stewie was identified as that selection. Doris Burke mentioned it during the Oregon State game in the second half. It was not a Stewie vs Parker thing. I believe her statement was, "Stewie will be the collegian on the Olympic team."

Also, Stewie has played for USA Basketball every step of the way during her development.
 
Last edited:
UcMiami said:
Just for some perspective on NT team make-up and the 'rookie' slot:
1996 - Lobo - no pro experience (none of the team had any but she was the youngest at 22 by 2 years)
1998 - Holdsclaw - still in college, Wolters one year out of college
2000 - Holdsclaw - 1 yr pro
2002 - Bird - no pro experience, and Catchings 1 year pro.
2004 - Taurasi - no pro experience
2006 - Parker - still in college, Augustus 1 year pro
2008 - Fowles - no pro experience and Parker no pro experience
2010 - Moore - still in college and Charles no pro experience
2012 - Moore - 1 year pro
2014 - Stewart - still in college and Sims no pro experience
2016 - Stewart - no pro experience

Since a USA profession league was first being organized in 1996 there have been 10 NT competitions and in 8 of those teams there has been a player on the team with no pro experience and in the other 2 there has been a player with a single year of pro ball. In 4 of the 8 teams the player with no pro experience was still in college and three of those four times the player was a junior (Holdsclaw, Parker, and Stewart) - interesting to note all for of those years were WC years and not Olympics. In every one of those four instances that college player on the WC team has also been on the following Olympic team with no pro experience or in Moore's case a single year.

It is clear from the above tat USA basketball generally reserves one or sometimes two places for pre-professional or barely professional players, and I am sure that in each of those years there was a professional player with a stronger claim to be included than the 'rookie' and I am sure there was controversy about the rookie being included. Looking at the rookies that have been included with the exception of Lobo and Wolters who succumbed early to injuries and Holdsclaw whose personal issues exploded, the rest of the players have remain in the USA pool since their first selection.

Parker herself was twice selected to the NT over better and far more experienced professional players so can we please stop with the Stewart over Parker discussion - that isn't and never was the choice being made.

Tina Thompson herself was a starter on both of those teams by the way, and I wonder if she felt the committee/one person was destroying USA basketball at that time?
Expand ...

Great analysis.
 
Phillyconn said:
YOU CAN'T LEAVE ONE OF THE TOP 5 PLAYERS IN THE WORLD, OFF THE TEAM. PERIOD!!!! This is not a McD's AA team. Whoever is responsible for this slight, should be ashamed of themselves. Absolutely, Ridiculous.
Expand ...
Absolutely, it isn't a McDonald's AA team. This team, actually, has to have proper balance and be able to play basketball not just run up and down the court and shoot. It needs proper balance by position and flexibility to address the various challenges international teams present from small and fast with great three point shooting to big players like Cambage for the Aussies.
 
Sorry, it was Beth Mowins who made the collegian statement about Stewie at 5:32 in the third quarter against Oregon State. "It is widely anticipated, Doris, that she will be 'the' graduating collegian that will join the United States at the Olympics in Rio."
 
Last edited:
UcMiami said:
Just for some perspective on NT team make-up and the 'rookie' slot:
1996 - Lobo - no pro experience (none of the team had any but she was the youngest at 22 by 2 years)
1998 - Holdsclaw - still in college, Wolters one year out of college
2000 - Holdsclaw - 1 yr pro
2002 - Bird - no pro experience, and Catchings 1 year pro.
2004 - Taurasi - no pro experience
2006 - Parker - still in college, Augustus 1 year pro
2008 - Fowles - no pro experience and Parker no pro experience
2010 - Moore - still in college and Charles no pro experience
2012 - Moore - 1 year pro
2014 - Stewart - still in college and Sims no pro experience
2016 - Stewart - no pro experience

Parker herself was twice selected to the NT over better and far more experienced professional players so can we please stop with the Stewart over Parker discussion - that isn't and never was the choice being made.
Expand ...

Small nit - 2014 worlds happened after the WNBA season. So Sims had a year of pro experience going into that tournament. Not sure if the same was true of previous years' Worlds.

The Stewart-Parker connection is very easy to make. One of USAB's stated reasons that Parker didn't make it was that that position is one of the team's strongest. What position does Parker play? She's a 4 that can play 3, too. (I think she starts at 3 for LA, but bear with me. EDD starts at a 3 for CHI - I'd still say her primary position is 4). Who else does that describe? Delle Donne and Stewart. Well, no one's going to be upset about the reigning MVP making the team. So naturally, they look at Stewart.

I see both sides. Yes, they've always had the "rookie" slot. So in that sense it's more Delle Donne taking Parker's spot than Stewart. Honestly, as an EDD fan I was a little scared she would still miss for that very reason.

On the other hand, nowhere is it set in stone that you must have a "rookie" slot.

Lastly, you could of course have had all 3 on the same team. One possible solution being that you could take out Charles or Fowles and make Delle Donne moonlight at 5 if absolutely necessary.
 
.-.
Orangutan - thanks for that mention about the WC - the dates for that competition shift around a lot while the Olympics are more fixed into the mid-summer window - the Olympians and WC team members that I list as no pro experience could well have a few months by the time the team actually formed but they were all 'in the pool' prior to their pro career beginning.

It may not be 'set in stone' about the rookie slot, but 8 of 10 with the other two being first year pros seems pretty 'concrete'. :)

With Cambage and a few others out there, I don't think Fowles/Griner/Charles not making the team was ever an option. I think the real question came down to: do we disappoint Candace or do we disappoint Catchings. (I know that isn't what I originally posted but it is my gut feeling - USA basketball chose sentiment and leadership over skill for the 'last' position on the team.)

We think of EDD as the reigning WNBA POY, but she is the only member of the NT team who has NEVER played against another National team in her career, and she has one WUG competition in 2011 of international play - she has yet to play for a foreign team having played professionally only with Chicago. Stewart has played three international competitions against national teams, as well as 5 other age specific competitions internationally. In fact she has been playing international rules basketball for 7 years already.
 
UcMiami said:
Parker herself was twice selected to the NT over better and far more experienced professional players so can we please stop with the Stewart over Parker discussion - that isn't and never was the choice being made.
Expand ...

This isn't accurate. When the 2008 Olympic team was announce, they first started with naming only 9 players and then adding 3 more as the season went on. Parker and Fowles were both part of the original 9 and each player had already debuted in the WNBA. In Parkers first game in the WNBA, she scored 34 point and 12 rebounds. She also had followed that up with other outstanding performances prior to the selection. The committee knew what they were getting in terms of how she played against professional competition.

In addition, Candace played with team USA during the qualifying rounds in 2007. Australia, with Lauren Jackson, was one of the teams they faced. She played along side the other US pros. Note that Tina Thompson played along side Candace prior to 2008, so she certainly wasn't upset that Candace was added as a rookie.

Both times the U.S. came out on top. However, the first contest saw the USA post a heady 96-64 victory as Thompson led the way with 21 points; while the second game was a much closer affair, 70-66. Candace Parker earned high scoring honors with 23 points.

Parker paced the U.S. with 15.5 ppg., Tina Thompson averaged 15.0 ppg.
 
Justavisitor said:
This isn't accurate. When the 2008 Olympic team was announce, they first started with naming only 9 players and then adding 3 more as the season went on. Parker and Fowles were both part of the original 9 and each player had already debuted in the WNBA. In Parkers first game in the WNBA, she scored 34 point and 12 rebounds. She also had followed that up with other outstanding performances prior to the selection. The committee knew what they were getting in terms of how she played against professional competition.

In addition, Candace played with team USA during the qualifying rounds in 2007. Australia, with Lauren Jackson, was one of the teams they faced. She played along side the other US pros. Note that Tina Thompson played along side Candace prior to 2008, so she certainly wasn't upset that Candace was added as a rookie.

Both times the U.S. came out on top. However, the first contest saw the USA post a heady 96-64 victory as Thompson led the way with 21 points; while the second game was a much closer affair, 70-66. Candace Parker earned high scoring honors with 23 points.

Parker paced the U.S. with 15.5 ppg., Tina Thompson averaged 15.0 ppg.
Expand ...
Candace was first added to the national team as a collegian for the 2006 WC with no professional experience and no prior experience in the NT - she was added while Lisa Leslie, Yolanda Griffith, and Dawn Staley were politely asked to step aside, and a few others from the 2004 gold medal team were dropped. Lisa, Dawn, and Yolanda were all stars in 2006.
 
UcMiami said:
Tina Thompson herself was a starter on both of those teams by the way, and I wonder if she felt the committee/one person was destroying USA basketball at that time?
Expand ...


UC: An unnecessary aside:

Tina was a starter because she earned it.
perhaps not a superstar but a heckova excellent player
 
msf22b said:
UC: An unnecessary aside:

Tina was a starter because she earned it.
perhaps not a superstar but a heckova excellent player
Expand ...
Tina had a great career -
I am just wondering if she was outraged when Yolanda Grifiths, Dawn Staley, and Lisa Leslie, her star teammates from the 2004 Olympic team were not part of the 2006 WC team and some college Junior with no experience in international competition was added to the team. Because it appears that is what she is complaining about this year.
 
.-.
UcMiami said:
Candace was first added to the national team as a collegian for the 2006 WC with no professional experience and no prior experience in the NT - she was added while Lisa Leslie, Yolanda Griffith, and Dawn Staley were politely asked to step aside, and a few others from the 2004 gold medal team were dropped. Lisa, Dawn, and Yolanda were all stars in 2006.
Expand ...

COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (May 23, 2006) - Continuing on its past success of building gold medal winning teams around a core group of internationally experienced players, USA Basketball, which has claimed gold at the last two FIBA World Championships and past three Olympic Games, announced today that three-time Olympic gold medalists Lisa Leslie (Los Angeles Sparks) and Sheryl Swoopes (Houston Comets), two-time Olympic gold medalist Katie Smith (Detroit Shock/Ohio State, 1993-96), 2000 Olympic gold medalist DeLisha Milton-Jones (Washington Mystics), and 2004 Olympic gold medalists Sue Bird (Seattle Storm), Tamika Catchings (Indiana Fever) Diana Taurasi (Phoenix Mercury) and Tina Thompson (Houston Comets) have been selected as the first eight members of the 2006 USA Women's World Championship Team. The selections were made by the USA Basketball Women's Senior National Team Committee and approved by the USA Basketball Executive Committee.
 
UcMiami said:
Just for some perspective on NT team make-up and the 'rookie' slot:
1996 - Lobo - no pro experience (none of the team had any but she was the youngest at 22 by 2 years)
1998 - Holdsclaw - still in college, Wolters one year out of college
2000 - Holdsclaw - 1 yr pro
2002 - Bird - no pro experience, and Catchings 1 year pro.
2004 - Taurasi - no pro experience
2006 - Parker - still in college, Augustus 1 year pro
2008 - Fowles - no pro experience and Parker no pro experience
2010 - Moore - still in college and Charles no pro experience
2012 - Moore - 1 year pro
2014 - Stewart - still in college and Sims no pro experience
2016 - Stewart - no pro experience

Since a USA profession league was first being organized in 1996 there have been 10 NT competitions and in 8 of those teams there has been a player on the team with no pro experience and in the other 2 there has been a player with a single year of pro ball. In 4 of the 8 teams the player with no pro experience was still in college and three of those four times the player was a junior (Holdsclaw, Parker, and Stewart) - interesting to note all for of those years were WC years and not Olympics. In every one of those four instances that college player on the WC team has also been on the following Olympic team with no pro experience or in Moore's case a single year.

It is clear from the above tat USA basketball generally reserves one or sometimes two places for pre-professional or barely professional players, and I am sure that in each of those years there was a professional player with a stronger claim to be included than the 'rookie' and I am sure there was controversy about the rookie being included. Looking at the rookies that have been included with the exception of Lobo and Wolters who succumbed early to injuries and Holdsclaw whose personal issues exploded, the rest of the players have remain in the USA pool since their first selection.

Parker herself was twice selected to the NT over better and far more experienced professional players so can we please stop with the Stewart over Parker discussion - that isn't and never was the choice being made.

Tina Thompson herself was a starter on both of those teams by the way, and I wonder if she felt the committee/one person was destroying USA basketball at that time?
Expand ...

You make some good points, but Parker was never selected over better players. As a collegiate she averaged 13/6 on the senior national team and was a go to player at just 19 or 20 years old. And there wasn't anyone the caliber of 2016 Candace Parker who she was selected over.

I have no issue with Stewart being selected, I personally would've chopped one of the centers or Augustus/Angel over Stewsrt since I think it's important to incorporate young talent. That said, based on the fact that Geno is the head coach, there are 5 Huskies on the team and Parker gets snubbed...people who are looking for someone to blame have easy targets in UCONN/Geno. How much input Geno has in choosing the team is unknown to us despite people's claims that he has a ton of input and others saying it is solely up to the committ.

The only logical reason for axing Parker is some personal beef between Parker and someone at team USA or on the staff. People here trying to rationalize her not making the squad are grasping for straws. Strategically it makes zero sense to not include one of the world's best all around players. Fortunately for Team ISA, they are far more talented than anyone in the world so even without Parker (or anyone in their lineup), they shouldn't have any problem cruising to a title. USA's A, B, C and D team could probably take the gold this year.
 
UcMiami said:
Candace was first added to the national team as a collegian for the 2006 WC with no professional experience and no prior experience in the NT - she was added while Lisa Leslie, Yolanda Griffith, and Dawn Staley were politely asked to step aside, and a few others from the 2004 gold medal team were dropped. Lisa, Dawn, and Yolanda were all stars in 2006.
Expand ...

Dawn was a coach of the team, Griffith and Leslie both made the roster but didnt play. Parker also ended up being one of the team's best players that tournament.
 
ericsandiego said:
Parker was on the 2012 Olympic team that Geno coached. Anyone who really thinks Geno had a say in Candace NOT making the team is kidding themselves. I don't know how to put it any more clearly. He wasn't even on the 5 member selection committee. But I suspect trying to convince you of the reality would be like trying to convince an atheist in the existence of God... Maybe if Carol came out and said "Geno had no say in keeping Parker off the team" that would be enough for you... but I'm not holding my breath for that to happen.
Expand ...
There's no doubt in my mind that Geno had "a say". He just didn't have " the say."
 
DaddyChoc said:
Parker was left off to make room for Stewie... in 2012 Stewie wasnt an issue so thats why CP3 was on the that team. AJones nor Cash should've made the teams they were on.
Expand ...
Without Asjha's defense on Cambage in the semi-finals in London, we might have been in the bronze medal game. Neither Fowles nor Parker could stop Liz.
 
mkwstar23 said:
i understand your thoughts but it appears that the selection committee thinks that there are 12 players in the US better than her...crazy...i think she should have been selected...hope the reason, the real reason she was not selected comes out some day...
Expand ...
The USA Basketball and Geno view:

They pick the 12 players who make up the best TEAM, not the 12 best players.
 
.-.
UConnCat said:
The news was first reported by ESPN's Los Angeles reporter. Given the location of the reporter, I mentioned that the source was likely Parker herself or someone she told, eg, someone connected to the Sparks.
Expand ...
I agree with Cat. I also believe that Candace commented on it on Monday. Even if she hadn't leaked it, she shouldn't have commented until Wednesday. Here's the point, which is true at UConn and in USA Basketball: BEING A TEAM PLAYER TRUMPS TALENT. Candace has plenty of talent, but that was not the primary criterion. Get over it, folks!
 
MilfordHusky said:
Without Asjha's defense on Cambage in the semi-finals in London, we might have been in the bronze medal game. Neither Fowles nor Parker could stop Liz.
Expand ...
Jones was selected for to team to defend Cambage?

Is Cambage playing in the upcoming Games, I think she was injured a while back!
 
DaddyChoc said:
Jones was selected for to team to defend Cambage?

Is Cambage playing in the upcoming Games, I think she was injured a while back!
Expand ...
I'm not sure why AJ was selected, but probably for her midrange shot and her defense. In the semi-finals, she was arguably our most important player. The Aussies led for the entire first half, because we could not stop Cambage. Parker was one who failed miserably at that task. People remember that we won the gold medal game against France convincingly. But we were in deep trouble in the semis and trailed at the half.
 
bballnut90 said:
You make some good points, but Parker was never selected over better players. As a collegiate she averaged 13/6 on the senior national team and was a go to player at just 19 or 20 years old. And there wasn't anyone the caliber of 2016 Candace Parker who she was selected over.

I have no issue with Stewart being selected, I personally would've chopped one of the centers or Augustus/Angel over Stewsrt since I think it's important to incorporate young talent. That said, based on the fact that Geno is the head coach, there are 5 Huskies on the team and Parker gets snubbed...people who are looking for someone to blame have easy targets in UCONN/Geno. How much input Geno has in choosing the team is unknown to us despite people's claims that he has a ton of input and others saying it is solely up to the committ.

The only logical reason for axing Parker is some personal beef between Parker and someone at team USA or on the staff. People here trying to rationalize her not making the squad are grasping for straws. Strategically it makes zero sense to not include one of the world's best all around players. Fortunately for Team ISA, they are far more talented than anyone in the world so even without Parker (or anyone in their lineup), they shouldn't have any problem cruising to a title. USA's A, B, C and D team could probably take the gold this year.
Expand ...

You and a lot of other LV fans have given a lot of Parker's scoring stats in those early years. What you never seem to remember was that the players she guarded also scored. A lot. parker was never much interested in playing defense in college, unless it was in the final seconds of a close game. I distinctly remember watching guards who had driven past the LV guards going by her as she stood there. Parker has gotten even better as an offensive player, finally, at the age of around 30 learning to shoot from behind the arc, at a mediocre efficiency. Sure, Parker is a star. She is a potent low post scorer, one of the best. But team USA doesn't need her and her spotty participation in the worlds (too busy to be there in either 2010 or 1014) didn't ingratiate her with the committee. This isn't Tennessee where she could come and go and miss practices with nothing more than a tap on the wrist. To me she's always been somewhat of a prima donna, unwilling to do the dirty work of basketball, setting picks and battling in the paint, preferring to stand out on the edges, calling for the ball. I understand you have a different view. I guess I would too if she represented the last time my team saw glory.
 
.-.
Alydar said:
You and a lot of other LV fans have given a lot of Parker's scoring stats in those early years. What you never seem to remember was that the players she guarded also scored. A lot. parker was never much interested in playing defense in college, unless it was in the final seconds of a close game. I distinctly remember watching guards who had driven past the LV guards going by her as she stood there. Parker has gotten even better as an offensive player, finally, at the age of around 30 learning to shoot from behind the arc, at a mediocre efficiency. Sure, Parker is a star. She is a potent low post scorer, one of the best. But team USA doesn't need her and her spotty participation in the worlds (too busy to be there in either 2010 or 1014) didn't ingratiate her with the committee. This isn't Tennessee where she could come and go and miss practices with nothing more than a tap on the wrist. To me she's always been somewhat of a prima donna, unwilling to do the dirty work of basketball, setting picks and battling in the paint, preferring to stand out on the edges, calling for the ball. I understand you have a different view. I guess I would too if she represented the last time my team saw glory.
Expand ...

This just tells me you have zero idea what you're talking about when it comes to Candace Parker. Perhaps look up Alberta Auguste's post regarding Parker. Paints a pretty different picture than yours. She was an excellent defender in college. She often guarded the 3 spot at 6'4 and at the top of the press. Spencer and Anosike guarded the 4 and 5 spot quite a bit. Tennessee held opponents under 60ppg for her career. She struggled versus Cambage in the first half but as another UConn fan said, Sue Bird could've guarded her in the second half. Cambage lost every ounce of energy in that first half. Charles couldn't guard her either. Fowles was injured and didn't play. Parker openly stated her disappointment and then came back with a 21 point 10 rebound gold medal game. She lead the team in blocks and rebounds for the tourney and was third in scoring. She was 3rd in FG% behind Angel and Sylvia and was 6th in assists.

Anyways, she got suspended for a half for a 3 minute curfew violation at her homecoming game against DePaul. She never missed a practice in her career and as everyone who played with her at Tennessee has said, she was the first one in the gym and last one out. At Tennessee, a missed practice would've been a 2 game suspension, regardless of which player it was.

I'll be waiting the rest of my life for an actual logical and respectful reason as the why she was cut... especially after doing their marketing for the last few months. "Hey, you are the face of the team but you can't come to Rio."
 
f78354a028e8465da63d26057aef4e78.jpg
 
I understand that LV fans are angry. UConn fans are as surprised as you that Parker wasn't chosen for the team so please dial down the aggression. If you want to discuss or argue, fine, but some fans' tones are turning hostile. Let's all remember we're adults discussing a game here.
 
tennparker3 said:
I'll be waiting the rest of my life for an actual logical and respectful reason as the why she was cut... especially after doing their marketing for the last few months. "Hey, you are the face of the team but you can't come to Rio."
Expand ...

Why are you owed a reason that she did not make the team? Those involved are being respectful by not giving any details.
 
bballnut90 said:
Dawn was a coach of the team, Griffith and Leslie both made the roster but didnt play. Parker also ended up being one of the team's best players that tournament.
Expand ...
Yes, Leslie and Griffiths were in the pool, but not on the actual team, and while Parker put up nice numbers, you cannot tell me that leaving probably the best center USA has ever had off a team to allow any college player onto the team was not 'suspect'. But ... that is what the USA committee does - it brings in a rookie or two to every team it sends out to a competition, and it has historically then stuck with that rookie for the next several cycles.

I am not actually knocking that Candace was brought into the 2006 and 2008 team, or that Holdsclaw was brought into the 1998/2000 team. It is what the USA national team has done for the last 20 years and it seems to work really well - I just am really tired of people pointing at the next college/rookie player Stewart and saying she should be left off the team. She is following the exact same pattern of Holdsclaw, Parker, and Moore - brought into the NT for a WC competition while still in college and retained in the NT for the next Olympics. So ... people can point to other players but leave Stewart out of it - of the four college players added to NT teams she is by far the most experienced with her 5 pre-NT gold medals and being the only one of them to twice be named USA women's player of the year.

FYI - Of the players on the team all but three have won more USA gold national team medals than Candace - Brittany Griner (1), Breanna Stewart (1) and EDD (0) - for the last two, this is only the second chance for them to make a team and EDD was injured the previous time. Griner had a chance to make the Olympic team in 2012 but was just finishing college and did not feel ready for the responsibility. Of the other nine players, 6 have played on all three of the Geno coached gold medal teams and the other three have played on two of the three. Of those former NT members who were dropped from this team - Candice Dupree is the only one to have played on 2 Geno coached teams, Odyssey, Nneka, and Parker have only made one of them (Sims was still in college, and Nneka has just graduated in 2012.)

As for Mechelle mentioning Nneka being the only #1 draft pick during an Olympic year not included in a NT - it is a very small sample size, and requires an assumption of equal quality entering the draft each year which is clearly not the case - the list includes only 4 players - Diana, Candace, Nneka, and Breanna - it is pretty easy to identify the one player who while a great basketball player stands out - DT, CP3 and Breanna were all NPOY, NCAA champions for at least the second time in a row, and MVP of that years FF. Love Nneka as a player and a person, but the other three players on that list are, as collegians, on a different level.
 
.-.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,387
Messages
4,570,031
Members
10,474
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom