Strange that 2 random schools; Georgia and Ole miss are also involved with other transfers we are after.We made his top Five: others involved Georgia ole miss, seton hall and Oregon.
Solid list.
I prefer VaughnWho do we prefer, Vaughn or Martin?
Sit one play 2. That’s a negative not a positive.Martin is 2 years vs 1 for vaughn, so I’d say martin.
I’m not sure. I’m looking to be convinced one way or the other. Vaughn I feel is the more sure bet. While Martin has a lot of upside, but has been rumored to have had some attitude issues. Interesting discussion
It's not just URI fans, a few posters here. Though none I'd exactly put a ton of faith inLet me guess, rumored by disgruntled URI fans? Keep in mind they sure had lots to say about Hurley's attitude right after he left.
It's not just URI fans, a few posters here. Though none I'd exactly put a ton of faith in
The problems I have with Martin is less about his attitude, we can use some attitude, it’s more about his play. Career 1 to 2 Assists to TO(yikes), 65% FT shooter, 31% 3 pt shooter. I do like his rebounding and size though, and think he has some upside. If he’s a sit one no way you take him, he uses 3 seasons of scholarships. This is like bringing in Alterique Gilbert to sit one.Let me guess, rumored by disgruntled URI fans? Keep in mind they sure had lots to say about Hurley's attitude right after he left.
Ummmm, Brendan Adams?Idk if Hurley is the kind of guy to poach someone from RI. He has alot of respect for Cox and their fan base. Doesn't seem like he'd be the kind of guy to do that.
I trust Hurley over anyone, but the friend I have who is a URI alum/fan reiterated we don’t not want him at all.
That being said, I’ll take Vaughn over him.
I bet your friend loved him after the Alabama game or the second VCU game or a number of other times over the last two years, though. I probably watched as many Rhody as UConn games the last two seasons. I feel he wasn’t particularly well coached while at Rhode Island, which was due in part to their limited number of available players, and there were clear issues with chemistry, especially in 18-19. Not every coach and player are a good match. He’d have an adjustment coming in to the program, but I think he’d respond. He’s not my first choice, but he would contribute. There’s so much uncertainty with recruiting with the ‘21 class with how much is going to be canceled, I don’t see a problem with him taking up 2 to 3 years of a roster spot if that’s how it turns out,
Vaughn is also bad with assists turnovers and ft's.The problems I have with Martin is less about his attitude, we can use some attitude, it’s more about his play. Career 1 to 2 Assists to TO(yikes), 65% FT shooter, 31% 3 pt shooter. I do like his rebounding and size though, and think he has some upside. If he’s a sit one no way you take him, he uses 3 seasons of scholarships. This is like bringing in Alterique Gilbert to sit one.
Martin vs. Vaughn is a toss up for me. Vaughn has the edge with his numbers, but you get an added level of comfort that Martin can produce with a good SOS, whereas Vaughn has barely any HM experience. People have been critical of Martin’s efficiency, but he was still very solid for a sophomore. That being said, he has a long way to go with passing and ball handling. Vaughn is clearly better in those areas. I don’t think either is a star, but I’d be happy to have either.
the correct answer is Nolley.
between these 2 I want the guy who takes up less scholarship time.
Fine, but Vaughn takes up one year of scholarship. Martin takes up 3 and sits 1. Huge factor. I trust Hurley though, if he feels he can motivate him and develop him you take him.Vaughn is also bad with assists turnovers and ft's.