Everybody has gotta work reeeeaaaally hard to focus on the only issue that matters:
What the contract says. It uses very broad language that allows for Ollie's termination for even the smallest of rules violations. Ollie's lawyer advised him to sign it. If the contract says, "yeah, even a phone call to Ray Ray constitutes "just cause", " then Ollie should get what is coming to him, which is zero.
Is that "right"? Who cares? That's the wrong question presented by somebody who has lost focus or never had it.
No matter what emotional, irrational headline some scrub at a click bait internet cyberag cobbles together, all that matters is this:
Ollie had counsel. Ollie signed the contract. The contract governs.
If Ollie doesn't like that, he can google, "legal malpractice attorney connecticut."