- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,048
- Reaction Score
- 47,646
Say what?UConn and Tulane could be added for all sports in the ACC this fall.
Say what?UConn and Tulane could be added for all sports in the ACC this fall.
Rumors are just that rumors. If ESPN wanted UConn in they would be in. Don't trust ESPN.If the rumor that ESPN was willing to pay to have UConn in the Big12, and ESPN really DOES want UConn as part of their inventory (without having to share UConn with Fox and thereby achieving a coup against them by taking away the prize of the Big East), then they could try to convince the ACC, though I don't see this happening without rewriting the GOR and placating Clemson and FSU. I think Van Halen reuniting for a tour has a greater chance of happening (RIP EVH).
I think the lesson once again is that basketball is meaningless in conference realignment. Every power conference is based on football as number one. If anyone thinks the ACC is going to take UConn because of basketball, you are dreaming. They will take Memphis and Tulane, and possibly USF before they take UConn. Don't count on help from ESPN. Not happening.This 100%. The college athletics landscape is going to look drastically different in 5 years. I would have preferred the B12 invite happened so we could be on the P4 side when it happens but have no doubt we will end up in a good place that’s more in line with our fan base.
Culturally we are a much better fit for the ACC. They could easily make a run at being the best hoops conference by taking us and adding something like Villanova, St John’s, Marquette, and Gonzaga in a basketball alliance. Maybe Tulane?
Plus I do believe conferences by sports is the future.
What is the ACC culturally? It's going to be castoffs and the terrible Texas and West Coast additions eventually.This 100%. The college athletics landscape is going to look drastically different in 5 years. I would have preferred the B12 invite happened so we could be on the P4 side when it happens but have no doubt we will end up in a good place that’s more in line with our fan base.
Culturally we are a much better fit for the ACC. They could easily make a run at being the best hoops conference by taking us and adding something like Villanova, St John’s, Marquette, and Gonzaga in a basketball alliance. Maybe Tulane?
Plus I do believe conferences by sports is the future.
If Duke, UVA, Cal and Stanford, as well as Tulane are members, it's something like the Ivy League but with better athletics. Would be fine place for UConn for a decade.What is the ACC culturally? It's going to be castoffs and the terrible Texas and West Coast additions eventually.
I don't think Yormark screwed us or anything. He truly wants UConn. He just can't get the rest of the Big 12 to see the benefits he sees. Bottom line.
TBH, I think a lot of the presidents are waiting to see if FSU and/or Clemson become available. They'd be kicking themselves if they took UConn and for reason weren't able to pick up one or both of those schools.
The bigger problem now is that our FB team will continue to struggle with attendance. Yes they need to win but playing mediocre teams that no one gives two poops about is not going to put any butts in the seats. Even if they are winning, no one is selling out the Rent to see us play GA St or Buffalo. That's a big problem with no conference affiliation.
It might happen, but only if ESPN thought it was in its best interest to value the big east conference by removing us.I think the lesson once again is that basketball is meaningless in conference realignment. Every power conference is based on football as number one. If anyone thinks the ACC is going to take UConn because of basketball, you are dreaming. They will take Memphis and Tulane, and possibly USF before they take UConn. Don't count on help from ESPN. Not happening.
It’s just a matter of time until this whole thing implodes. Both B12 and ACC will not be able to keep up with the P2. Then they’ll realize the drawbacks of these long distance adds.What is the ACC culturally? It's going to be castoffs and the terrible Texas and West Coast additions eventually.
ESPN is not going to overspend for UConn... sure they want UConn, the question is "for how much"Rumors are just that rumors. If ESPN wanted UConn in they would be in. Don't trust ESPN.
half right, the ACC cannot keep up. The whole basketball gambit is to stake a pin on the B10 and SEC's collegiate dominance.It’s just a matter of time until this whole implodes. Both B12 and ACC will not be able to keep up with the P2. Then they’ll realize the drawbacks of these long distance adds.
We’ll end up in a conference with Syracuse, BC, Duke, UNC, Ga Tech, Pitt, Virginia, and others. If a couple get poached there are options to backfill. Now is not the time too panic.
Yormark needs to pony up and pay a premium for the UConn brand. $15M sounds about right to me until we get a full member share.I think that’s my only concern with what we’ve been hearing. Big12 has a right to ensure UConn fb gets competitive through investments.
But, if the bump from BE to Big 12 deal is $3M per year, and you put all that into fb, is that enough?
Can UConn invest in fb enough to beef up that program and be competitive in Big 12. Right now Big 12 is 75% fb, 25% bb. UConn is +90% BB.
UConn is going to have to come up with $’s in the short term (skin in the game) for fb before Big 12 is going to share the pie. That seems fair as long as bb is adequately valued and UConn has a plan to get there
Ah, well that's comforting. Will you let us know when the time to panic comes?Now is not the time too panic.
Bingo. You nailed it.My thought is we were not buying what they were selling. My guess is they were trying to get us at a bargain basement rate and they didn't have the votes to do any better. Thus the mutual agreement to stop the process. Travel isnt worth it for status quo money. Yormack comes out of this looking bad.
I actually think they do want Connecticut, but mostly because we are a cost-effective team to cover. That speaks to your point as to "how much is that worth".ESPN is not going to overspend for UConn... sure they want UConn, the question is "for how much"
6 tentative yeses and 10 no. Well this should now put dreams of the B12 in the rear view mirror. I did say this a year ago stating our football program is the problem. Best to wait for the fallout with the AAC. They have D1 football unlike the Big East, have some valuable basketball cache and it’s a better geographical fit. I would think that Duke, NC, NC State along with us would appeal to the media outlets.the word on our boards was that uconn had 6 tentative yes votes.
Okay. I’ll clarify. Our athletic department and all our teams will not go down the toilet.Ah, well that's comforting. Will you let us know when the time to panic comes?
Yes you get it. I’ve said this time and again and I was called a troll, a UConn football hater and pro Big East. I am none of those things. We need to fix football now.In all candor, I personally don't see this as a setback (although it did open us up for trolls to come out of the woodwork in an attempt to belittle us).
It still will come down entirely to whether we can or cannot fix the football program. Everything else is at best glitter, at worst, packing materials. If we can get the football program to where it was 15 years ago and demonstrate that it won't take an unreasonable effort to sustain it, we will get picked up by a P level conference. It starts and ends there.
That we won't have an early admission, without football does not hurt us as correcting the problem will still be the task.
So... panic or no?Okay. I’ll clarify. Our athletic department and all our teams will not go down the toilet.
Not today boy!So... panic or no?
I hear they definitely want us in either the B12 or ACC. ESPN is not a foe in this process, but rather they are helping. We are basically the only top tier program not sitting with the correct cohort.I actually think they do want Connecticut, but mostly because we are a cost-effective team to cover. That speaks to your point as to "how much is that worth".
I assume it was cincy, houston, and UCF - they are not any more deserving of the power 4 than we are. Yes they all had one or 2 good football seasons to hang their hat on (eg. UCF 2017 "nat'l championship") but that balances out with our sustained and undisputable basketball success.It was reported that Connecticut had six tentative yes and two tentative no (which is spot on at the 75% mark that we needed) with the remainder undecided. It's the remainder that I'm curious about. So I not sure if the people on your board I just riffing off that initial poll. of half the conference or whether we never got higher than six.
Plus, I'd like to know who are no votes are, just so I have a rooting interest against them.
Correction I meant ACC6 tentative yeses and 10 no. Well this should now put dreams of the B12 in the rear view mirror. I did say this a year ago stating our football program is the problem. Best to wait for the fallout with the AAC. They have D1 football unlike the Big East, have some valuable basketball cache and it’s a better geographical fit. I would think that Duke, NC, NC State along with us would appeal to the media outlets.
If we beat Merrimack by a field goal and MSU drops Maryland by 30 ... panic. If we win by 20 and Maryland wins by 20... wait another week to panic.So... panic or no?