I didn't read
@meyers7 as saying Notre Dame is not good because UConn beat them. He said they are not currently ranked and that they are not as good as usual this year. Both of those claims are facts . . . not opinions . . . in my opinion.
However, I agree that "good" in the abstract is semantically subjective. Any team with more wins than losses could be considered good, which means there are about 180 good teams in DI WCBB. Not worth quibbling about.
I think the fighting issue is whether UConn's large MOV over Notre Dame is evidence that UConn will be an unstoppable juggernaut against the current AP 2-6 or whether it is repetitive non-evidence of that outcome. How much evidentiary weight does or should the Notre Dame MOV carry regarding the issue?