- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 93,234
- Reaction Score
- 365,702
Opposite. LIU played them once already and is scheduled for 2 more games, so will theoretically hurt UConn marginally by making the LIU wins look slightly less goodAre there schools that we will be competing with for a spot in the tournament who will benefit from having their Stonehill games stricken from the record?
Got it, thanks.Opposite. LIU played them once already and is scheduled for 2 more games, so will theoretically hurt UConn marginally by making the LIU wins look slightly less good
Looking at who the other school is scheduling each game is micromanaging the process. Other hockey programs looking to get into the tournament scheduled LIU as well. If a school has a low RPI or whatever rating system for scheduling is used, that is on UCONN. But if that team also schedules: BU, Ohio State, etc, they are trying to beef up their schedule and UConn shouldn't have an issue with that.If the Stonehill thing impacts UConn, thats on UConn for scheduling LIU. Period.
Seriously? How? Maybe you could argue it’s on LIU, who actually scheduled Stonehill.If the Stonehill thing impacts UConn, thats on UConn for scheduling LIU. Period.
I bet a million dollars Dave doesn’t even realize the Stonehill decision actually helps UConns Pairwise.
If the Stonehill thing impacts UConn, thats on UConn for scheduling LIU. Period.
Can you show me where you see this, because based on the reading I’ve done this is not actually the case.UConn has the 10th best win percentage in the country.
The only problem with the OT wins is they count as 2/3 of a win and an 1/3 of a loss when it comes to the Pairwise.
The only thing that matters is the Pairwise. Pairwise is the how the teams are chosen.I could be wrong here but I see Lowell as the concern. It seems that if we were to finish in the top four of the conference for both the regular season (this is where Lowell could cause problems) and tournament (entirely on us), it would be almost impossible for us to be viewed as one of the four most deserving hockey east schools. I imagine hockey east would have to receive four bids.
So what does that mean? it still doesn’t address OT wins vs regular wins. A teams RPI is based on strength of schedule and wins, losses and ties. It’s one of three factors in the pairwise calculation. I don’t see anywhere where the say an OT win is worth only 66% of a win. I’m just trying to understand how pairwise is calculated, not trying to call anyone out here. This article is the best simple explanation I have found.Last night UConn beat Northeastern in OT but fell behind Michigan State yet UConn was ahead of them before the start of play on Friday.
#13 Minnesota State lost to #45 St. Thomas in OT last night but did not fall one spot in the Pairwise.
I think a major factor is the NIL money and the Big Ten.The bottom line for me about the NCAA Tourney is that I feel like it should be expanded beyond 16 teams. Every year, worthy teams are left out. Why not include 4 or 8 more?
OT weighting: As of 2021-22, when college hockey went to 3-on-3 overtimes across the board, The Committee decided to weight these differently. OT wins are counted as 2/3 (0.6666) of a win, and 1/3 (0.3333) of a loss.So what does that mean? it still doesn’t address OT wins vs regular wins. A teams RPI is based on strength of schedule and wins, losses and ties. It’s one of three factors in the pairwise calculation. I don’t see anywhere where the say an OT win is worth only 66% of a win. I’m just trying to understand how pairwise is calculated, not trying to call anyone out here. This article is the best simple explanation I have found.
Demystifying the PairWise
If you’re curious about how the PairWise Rankings (PWR) or the Ratings Percentage Index (RPI) are determined, you’ve probably researched some of the explanations available online. Thoug…www.techhockeyguide.com
Ahha! Thank you! The blinders have been lifted from my eyes! Guess I should have read that whole article…turns out it was better than the one I read In full.I think a major factor is the NIL money and the Big Ten.
With the money available to those schools I would assume they would become fixtures within the top 16.
Right now the Big Ten has 6 of the 16 teams.
I think that could be a reason to expand the field so it doesn’t turn into the Big Ten Invitational.
OT weighting: As of 2021-22, when college hockey went to 3-on-3 overtimes across the board, The Committee decided to weight these differently. OT wins are counted as 2/3 (0.6666) of a win, and 1/3 (0.3333) of a loss.
Info - NCAA Tournament Pairwise Primer
Info - NCAA Tournament Pairwise Primerwww.collegehockeynews.com