Dooley
Done with U-con athletics
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 9,960
- Reaction Score
- 32,818
I was on that train.
Too funny. As soon as I watched it, I thought of you!
I was on that train.
If " safety" is the issue of primary concern, then perhaps no school should permit College Football on their campus. As for FBS playing FCS shools, while the scores tend to be lopsided, there is no data that shows that any more injuries are suffered in these games than when teams play teams from similar divisions. Uconn played Yale not that long ago. I don't recall Yale suffering any more serious injuries beyond the their fragile egos in the tilt.
I don't want to upset Yawkey/Tusky, but there is no such thing as a Boston College football championship from 1940. Every site I've seen states that Minnesota is the champion. So in light of this...
Poll for UConn fans: which "championship" carries more weight?
1. Syracuse 1959 Helms Trophy
2. Boston College 1940 mysterious championship*
*I've looked at a few sites and NONE of them recognize BC as sharing any sort of title in 1940. Perhaps our BC friends got their years mixed up...it's possible seeing as though it was over 70 friggin' years ago.
http://collegefootball.about.com/od/nationalchampions/a/champions-list_3.htm
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/champions_national.html
http://wilson.engr.wisc.edu/rsfc/history/kirlin/champs.html
And we thought Syracuse fans were pathetic. Making up championships has to be a new Boneyard low.
LOL nice try, UConn was a founding member of the Big East. The other founding members did not "vote" on UConn, or anyone's, admittance. Holy Cross rejected the offer from Dave Gavitt when he was formulating potential members, who then called UConn.BC voted " yes" for ( and Uconn's )admittance to the BE years earlier....
Post-Beanpot win T rides home are a rite of passage for BU students. It's essentially a giant party bus.Too funny. As soon as I watched it, I thought of you!
I've been to both New Haven for the Harvard- Yale game and to Cambridge for the Harvard - Yale. I have to hand it to the Beautiful People that annually go to this. Nobody stands totally upright at the games with the alcohol level 7 times the legal limit better than these folks. Its not really a football rivalry game. Its more of an event there. Most are so drunk at the game they are peering out to the field from the stands and can't see a gawddamn thing. Those here that have been at a Harvard- Yale game know precisely what I am talking about with this too.I've been to Yale, home of the most college championships, and I say your program is a joke. .
Sounds like a typical sporting event at UMass.Most are so drunk at the game they are peering out to the field from the stands and can't see a gawddamn thing.
Not for Football, brassboy. Uconn football had to separately ( and much later after the founding of the BE ) to apply for admittance to the BE for its football program to be considered for admittance to the BE., at which point as some may recall here, BC voted " Yes " for Uconn's football team to be included in the BE Football League. ( Of course this was before Blumenthal initiated his later lawsuit against Swofford, the ACC, BC, Miami, etc for " setting out to destroy Uconn football ", and all of that sorry saga)LOL nice try, UConn was a founding member of the Big East. The other founding members did not "vote" on UConn, or anyone's, admittance. Holy Cross rejected the offer from Dave Gavitt when he was formulating potential members, who then called UConn.
Be more specific next time, Yawkboy. And don't use false equivalences such as BC voting for WVU to join the league as a brand new all-sports member and BC voting for UConn, already a member of the league in all sports but one, to become a football member. The comparison is not the same.Not for Football, brassboy. Uconn football had to separately ( and much later after the founding of the BE ) to apply for admittance to the BE for its football program to be considered for admittance to the BE., at which point as some may recall here, BC voted " Yes " for Uconn's football team to be included in the BE Football League. ( Of course this was before Blumenthal initiated his later lawsuit against Swofford, the ACC, BC, Miami, etc for " setting out to destroy Uconn football ", and all of that sorry saga)
The Umass fans that attend the BC- Umass games for the most part are very well behaved. Even the ' Neers fans in Morgantoown are not as drunk at their games than the Bulldogs and the Crimson Faced are in their annual " Event ". Again... if you or others here have been to a Harvard- Yale game, you know this to be true.Sounds like a typical sporting event at UMass.
Not for Football, brassboy. Uconn football had to separately ( and much later after the founding of the BE ) to apply for admittance to the BE for its football program to be considered for admittance to the BE., at which point as some may recall here, BC voted " Yes " for Uconn's football team to be included in the BE Football League. ( Of course this was before Blumenthal initiated his later lawsuit against Swofford, the ACC, BC, Miami, etc for " setting out to destroy Uconn football ", and all of that sorry saga)
Ok... will do. And as a helpful suggestion to you moving forward, understand that you initial criticism reply to me that Uconn football did not have to apply for a much later admittance via BE vote, ( despite Uconn already in the BE for other sports, years earlier ) was an inaccurate comment from you.... and thus prompted my follow up reply to correct that clearly incorrect info on here that you had utilized in your initial reply to me above.Be more specific next time, Yawkboy. And don't use false equivalences such as BC voting for WVU to join the league as a brand new all-sports member and BC voting for UConn, already a member of the league in all sports but one, to become a football member. The comparison is not the same.
I did not imply that at all, I interpreted your comment as pertaining UConn's admittance to the Big East as a whole (based on the WVU example) in 1979, not as a football member in 2004.Ok... will do. And as a helpful suggestion to you moving forward, understand that you initial criticism reply to me that Uconn football did not have to apply for a much later admittance via BE vote, ( despite Uconn already in the BE for other sports, years earlier ) was an inaccurate comment from you.... and thus prompted my follow up reply to correct that clearly incorrect info on here that you had utilized in your initial reply to me above.
To keep this post on-point with the thread, most BC kids don't know which line to take from the Garden after the games they've won, so their rides are lame.
Sounds like a typical sporting event at UMass.
Not for Football, brassboy. Uconn football had to separately ( and much later after the founding of the BE ) to apply for admittance to the BE for its football program to be considered for admittance to the BE., at which point as some may recall here, BC voted " Yes " for Uconn's football team to be included in the BE Football League. ( Of course this was before Blumenthal initiated his later lawsuit against Swofford, the ACC, BC, Miami, etc for " setting out to destroy Uconn football ", and all of that sorry saga)
From Wiki:
"A banner on BC's campus commemorating the team uses the phrase "national champions," but Boston College was not awarded a national championship by any of the national polls at the time of the 1940 season. Although BC's claim to a title is not recognized by the NCAA or college football historians in general, one website, the College Football Data Warehouse, claims that selectors named Cliff Morgan and Ray Bryne rated BC #1 in 1940.[8] This web site states that BC's historic 1940 run resulted in a split championship with the University of Minnesota, but it's not clear whether the selectors awarded BC a title at the time of the 1940 season, or if they did so retroactively.[9] The NCAA lists only Minnesota as the national champion in 1940, and does not credit BC with any national championships in football.[10]"
Hard to argue with the opinions of two people.
While true regarding the NCAA of 1940 position on this ( not the same as NCAA of today regarding these things).... inquisitive minds on this topic ask themselves : if an undefeated team went into the Sugar Bowl today, defeated the #1 ranked team in that Sugar Bowl ( Tennessee ) would not that undefeated, untied, team win or at the very least share in that season's National Football Title ? I think most unbiased observers would conclude... " yes ". Now having said this, it is true the NCAA of 1940 does not recognize BC's claim of a share of that 1940 National Title. ( I've said this now 3 times on this very thread ) But there were people unafiliated with BC at the time that did recognize BC's sharing of that National Title ( Sportswriters Assoc). Also, for what its worth, the National Coaches Assoc. of 1940 did recognize BC as a shared Title holder that season.... but it was not until 10 years later ... 1950.... that the Coaches Poll became an acceptable format for ONE of the pre BCS vehicles to declare the National Champion.
Minnesota, Stanford, Boston College, and Tennessee all claim 1940 as a national championship season.