Ask WVU too, IIRC UCONN beat them a few years ago during HCRE 1.0.Today maybe, but we've been decent before. Ask ND or SC.
2010, I think.
Last edited:
Ask WVU too, IIRC UCONN beat them a few years ago during HCRE 1.0.Today maybe, but we've been decent before. Ask ND or SC.
So we should be embarrassed by losing to OU? At least we got to the game.Takes more than that and having one decent season that ended w an embarassing bcs situation.
History? Not enough, I'd agree. Infrastructure? We have better facilities for football than most P5 programs. As with most college sports, it's mostly about coaching. I think you'll see UConn rebound to go to a bowl this year, and improve from there. What UConn adds for football is a captive market. Most other programs outside the P5 are second or third tier programs in their own market. Memphis, Houston, UCF, USF, Colo State, BYU. None of them are the most popular team in their home market or ever will be.
UConn is on the clock, sure, but the Athletic Department has shown no signs of cutting back expenses.
If anything, in moves that surprise even a lot of Husky fans, the AD seems to be doubling down.
I don't think it means anything as far as foreshadowing to a league change, but they are certainly continuing to dump money into the programs.
So we should be embarrassed by losing to OU? At least we got to the game.
The fan showing, the result, and what your coach did. Also being labeled the least deserving bcs team ever. But the big east was essentially a mid major football conference at that point.
Also being labeled the least deserving bcs team ever.
The attendance issue is a myth. That game drew 67k fans. Compare to the 2009 game between Texas and Ohio State which drew 72k fans.
Coincidentally, nobody mentions the 2011 Orange Bowl from the same season. The results?
Stanford 40 - Virginia Tech 12. Attendance 65k
There's no deserving about it. It's not an at large bid or a selection committee. We won the league. We went to the game.
Now you're just making up.
I think thats generally considered to be true. Can u think of a worse team to make it?
Is it a dirty secret?yes.
Is it a dirty secret?
Good pt on attendance. I didnt know that. Maybe that is fake news. Was the issue UConn's ticket sales though?
WVU in those years when they should have held up the Big East's honor but got smoked. Some standard bearer. Then you let Rich Rod go, or more to say he fled out of there like the house was a-fire. And your embarrassing fans that threw batteries and bags of poop at opposing teams and fans, way to represent the Big East guy.
YesIsn't @jgeorge322 a Syracuse fan?
UConn fans "only" bought 3,000 tickets directly from the school, which is the story the national sports news ran with. The issue was that UConn had to eat the cost of the 15,000 unsold tickets, where as Oklahoma only sold around 8,000 tickets directly through the school but the B12 conference ate the difference.
The tickets directly through the school were outrageously expensive. However, many fans like me and my crew, who had shelled out $400 for a flight + hotel, bought our seats on Stub Hub for a fraction of the cost.
The ticket issue always bothers me, because if UConn only sold 3,000 and Oklahoma only sold 8,000 did they think 55,000 random fans from Arizona were interested in UConn football and it pushed the attendance to 67k?
Others on here have posted pictures of the game, but I don't think it's a stretch to say we had at least 20-25k in the house.
WVU in those years when they should have held up the Big East's honor but got smoked. Some standard bearer. Then you let Rich Rod go, or more to say he fled out of there like the house was a-fire. And your embarrassing fans that threw batteries and bags of poop at opposing teams and fans, way to represent the Big East guy.
Why are people engaging this a$$troll? Syracuse is a joke for cheating and sexual abuse. He is clueless about conference realignment and is only here to incite.
He's a pederast.
The attendance issue is a myth. That game drew 67k fans. Compare to the 2009 game between Texas and Ohio State which drew 72k fans.
Coincidentally, nobody mentions the 2011 Orange Bowl from the same season. The results?
Stanford 40 - Virginia Tech 12. Attendance 65k
There's no deserving about it. It's not an at large bid or a selection committee. We won the league. We went to the game.
Most people bought through 3rd parties, at half price or less. OU students were subsidized by B12 conference.Good pt on attendance. I didnt know that. Maybe that is fake news. Was the issue UConn's ticket sales though?
The fan showing, the result, and what your coach did. Also being labeled the least deserving bcs team ever. But the big east was essentially a mid major football conference at that point.
UConn fans "only" bought 3,000 tickets directly from the school, which is the story the national sports news ran with. The issue was that UConn had to eat the cost of the 15,000 unsold tickets, where as Oklahoma only sold around 8,000 tickets directly through the school but the B12 conference ate the difference.
The tickets directly through the school were outrageously expensive. However, many fans like me and my crew, who had shelled out $400 for a flight + hotel, bought our seats on Stub Hub for a fraction of the cost.
The ticket issue always bothers me, because if UConn only sold 3,000 and Oklahoma only sold 8,000 did they think 55,000 random fans from Arizona were interested in UConn football and it pushed the attendance to 67k?
Others on here have posted pictures of the game, but I don't think it's a stretch to say we had at least 20-25k in the house.