- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 13,362
- Reaction Score
- 33,634
Threads like this make you wonder why most of the good posters don’t post on the football board anymore.
You need to have that trained eye for talent and football vision to see what Tim could become.
So, where does the layman go to get this training?
Yes, that is an example where the receiver gets both hands on the ball, misses it and leads to an interception.
Please don’t be mistaken, I am not saying Tim had a great statistical career rather that there was evidence of talent and skills which could be developed with proper coaching and offensive system. You need to have that trained eye for talent and football vision to see what Tim could become.
So, where does the layman go to get this training?
Careful, This may be perceived as a serious question...So, where does the layman go to get this training?
How could you expect a man that took a beating like that to have a career that requires complex brain functions? Just aim his wheelchair left and right and smile at the camera Chandler!Chandler Whitmer looks like he's doing some modelling now.
Well....thank you for spicing up the football board. This should make this thread interesting
I do remember some Boyle passes being dropped. And...I don't think you can fairly assess his time at UConn. It was a mess. He had 13 INTs and 1 TD. And...looking at last year at EK, it wasn't that great either.
Has anyone with stats anywhere close to Boyle's actually played in the NFL? Honest question...not taking a shot at him. But if he makes it, it is a pretty amazing story.
View attachment 33312
So, where does the layman go to get this training?
At this point in your life - leave it up to Chief to read the stitches on the fast ball. Just enjoy yourself and the game experience and Chief and perhaps others will do the analyletics. Quite frankly, it’s probably too late in the game to try to do it all yourself. And that’s fine.
Thats true for the Disco era, especially. Edsall was doing fine developing players.For reasons beyond my capabilities to understand, it seems many players do well after they leave UConn.
It's possible with hard work to succeed. Flutie was only 5'10", Russell Wilson is 5'11" in an era when most pro scouts won't even look at you if you're less than 6'2". Tyler Matekevich was not a QB but was another player that made himself. You're correct that the chances of failure are a lot greater than success, but every once in a while some guy comes along that beats the odds. I hope Boyle is one of those.You just attribute everyone's success to "hard work" and "perseverance" and think that a positive outlook always results in a positive outcome. Plenty of positive, hard working people don't succeed.
You can have the best outlook and work the hardest out of anyone on Earth but if you're 5'5" you're not playing QB in High School nevermind the NFL
This is a habit that a lot of successful people have because they had success doing it, but it's purely anecdotal. Everyone thinks they work hard and have strong character.
Revealing interview.
Whatever the outcome of the Packer game, this is elegant proof that Pasqualoni had much more talented players then they showed.
Some just can’t see potential like Chief can and if you can’t see it - it’s difficult for Chief to describe the eye test. The criticism Tim took, reminds me of the criticism Dre Drummond took as a Freshman by many casual fans. QB is a difficult position to play when you’re young and you are averaging more than 1 coach per season. The casual fan doesn’t calculate that into the assessment formula and Diaco did not like the forward pass. Another factor was Tim had many drops due to UConn receivers not being use to the velocity of the ball coming out of his hands. But, with pros that velocity is needed given defensive team speed. And yet another factor was a secret injury that Chief knew about.
Dre had the same coaching Merry go round with Coach’s NCAA suspension and illnesses in 2012. Another factor was getting use to a broken nose and a face mask.
So going forward, the safe advice is trust in Chief, who will calculate all these factors.
What a silly comparison. For whatever reason, Boyle was beyond awful. If you saw NFL talent when he was here, you were not observing. if you end up right, it was still an irrational conclusion.
Drummond was coated with obvious NBA star talent -- what people (certainly what I) -- wondered about was not his talent, but whether the same group of players would have won more games had he not shown up in August. I still believe that to be the case to this day. AO and possibly Roscoe would have been players who earned their rings, instead of malcontents. That, by the way, is not Drummonds fault -- it's a combination of their own and the coaches who couldn't put an incredibly talented group of players together into a team.