OK, just watched the game. My thoughts:
1. This was an immensely entertaining game with some terrific offense, but let's be clear: that was not championship-level defense played by either team.
2. Let's be clear about another thing: it's a bad idea to judge teams based on statistical outliers. That's why I scoffed at the notion that Tennessee was a legit contender after the UCLA game; no one shoots 70% on a regular basis. By the same token, Nneka isn't going to score 42 on a regular basis. It was a joy to watch her play last night, but this is a very different game without that hurculean effort. Stanford is still very young and relatively weak (by Stanford standards) in the backcourt, notwithstanding Kokenis's productive night.
3. Stricklen is the only Tennessee player that you can count on to put in serious work night in and night out. The others? Well...
4. ...Glory: still immensely talented. Still seems to drift in and out of games. Still capable of getting riled up and making poor decisions. I'll say it again: she should be a first-team AA. The fact that she isn't is curious and concerning.
5. Spani- how can someone as good as she is disappear for large portions of games? Seriously, where on God's green earth was she in the second half?
6. Simmons- she actually played pretty well, especially in the first half, but she's yet another play who famously runs hot and cold.
7. Baugh- Baugh is Tennessee's Caroline Doty. Oft-injured, everyone's happy she's just out there at all, and she's capable of being really good at times. Just can't count on it night in and night out. This was definitely a night to forget for her.
8. Massengale- huh? Very, very confused about why she was out there tonight. Either she's ready to go or she isn't. Why did she not enter the game until there were 11 minutes left? The game was still in question at that point. Was it just an act of desperation to put her out there? In any event, she was ineffective.
9. Manning- she's the kind of player you love if she's on your team, but I'm going to say something harsh about the LVs: the fact that her effort stands out says as much negatively about some of her (more talented) teammates as it does positively about her. Everyone on UConn's team plays with that effort level or they don't play. Used to be the case with a Pat Summitt-coached team, too.
10. Pat- she has the right to go out on her own terms, but this program needs a head coach deep into the details. You can say her assistants are good enough that they could be running their own shows elsewhere, but we have no empirical evidence that they'd be immensely effective in those roles. The fact that Pat now NEEDS her assistants to do certain things may be a problem. UConn has been successful because Geno is involved with everything. Even when he delegates something to an assistant, he tends to step in with a wise-ass comment or whatever if he's not seeing the results he expected. Pat used to be like that- in her own way, obviously, but someone who could hold everyone deeply accountable. At any rate, I'm not seeing the individual or team development that I'm accustomed to from the LVs, and that starts with coaching. I want Pat to be happy with the circumstances and terms of her departure, but I also hope we don't get to a point where Tennessee's program languishes in the process.