in your first paragraph you say that TN had 1 foul called on them early and Stanford had 7 called on them. It was the opposite and that is what the poster on the Summitt that you quoted stated. There were some bad calls in the first half but that is not why we lost. We couldn't stop Nneka. Part is because she is a great player and partly because we didn't play good defense. Our offense was fine but we lost the game because of our defense and rebounding. Also you stated we didn't lose anyone to graduation. Bjorkland, Cain, and Brewer were big losses and it hurt not having Avant and Williams to backup our guards. Not blaming injuries or transfers at all but it is not factual to say that TN did not lose any players.i was reading the tennessee board for the thread to see how the game was progressing. they went out to a 8 point lead or so, and then Stanford came back. all the comments about home cooking, etc, until someone pointed out "Stanford - 7 fouls. Tennessee 1 foul". oops! blame the refs, blame the refs, blame the refs. come on. you got crunched by 17. news flash - it's NOT the refs. a 13 page thread with about 30% of the posts crying about the refs. seriously? Stanford called for 16 fouls, Tennessee for 15. Tennessee 22-29 from the FT line. Stanford 14-16.
i'm not sure too many UCONN fans predicted a total smackdown tho. i'm sure we'll all hear about how they didn't have Massengale. she wouldn't have made a difference. Stanford was without Camp. and Ariel doesn't account for a 20 point smackdown. neither are the refs to blame. Tennessee called for 14 fouls, Stanford for 16 with about 1 minute left in the game.
maybe it's time for some fans to realize tennessee has never taught offense. and they aren't big, strong, or overly athletic enough to rely on defense and O-boards to win. in fact, Stanford beat tennessee at it's own game - 30 boards (13 O) to 25 (9 O). and come on. a technical foul in the first half for having too many players on the court? i'm not sure that even happens in high school hoops.
i mean Stanford almost put up a C-note on tennessee. where was the defense? i'm sure tenn fans can console themselves with "well, we'll get Ariel back and be better by the end of the year". keep dreaming big. this team lost no one to graduation and already has as many losses this year than they had all of last year.
this is simply not a great tennessee program any more. sure they are a top 10 team. but they aren't sniffing the final 4 until things change in Knoxville. they have more talent on paper than anyone in the country, at least if you go by how highly the kids were rated in HS and how many HS AA's they have. yet the degree of underachievement is spectacularly on display.
Ok, you've lost completely frigging lost me.There's a big difference between Doris Burke's idea about the way the game is played, and Van Gundy's proposal for more competition in women's basketball. OK, maybe two games a year between top teams is too much. But the idea that the top women's basketball teams should play each other is not turning the women's game into "men's lite." That's absurd. So, having some real competitive games makes it like the men's game? Come on.
I've been watching UConn (and other women's teams when on national TV) for years now and the games between the most competitive schools are thrilling. Just like our game the other night vs. Baylor. We lost, but I was on the edge of my seat for the first time in a long time in watching a UConn game. On the other hand, watching the Huskies (or other top schools) destroy a minor basketball team by 30-40 points, which happens far too often in the schedule, is not exactly exciting competition and it drags the game down.
And as for UConn and Tennessee fading into oblivion someday, well what has that got to do with the proposal? It was for the best of the moment. That could be any school whether it be Ohio State, Oklahoma, UCLA, Maryland, or even Old Dominion. If they're among the best, then the women's game needs more competitive games. Can you really argue, with a straight face, that the women's game should go on at its current level with the real competition coming in the late stages of the NCAA championship?
As a UT fan, I pretty much agree. I mean, how dumb do you have to be to let Ogwumike AND everyone else score??The Cardinal shoots 53.6% for the game and absolutely annihilates the Lady Vols in the paint (40 to 18) and from the perimeter (43% from 3-point land). UT has absolutely no concept of what weak side or team defense is all about. Stanford basically only had three players that shot the ball all night and still the orange clad "defenders" couldn't stop what they know was coming.
The only people who think UT has a shot at a NC any time in the near future are drinking Orange Kool Aid. The UT program is shadow of what it use to be. You had a nice run ladies and Coach Summitt, but it's time to more over and prepare yourself for the inevitable...that UConn will eventually match and and leave UT in the dust in regard to overall NC's won and become the winningest WCBB of all-time, and that Geno will surpass PHS as the all-time winningest coach.
However, it would be wrong not the acknowledge the tremendous effort tonight by Stanford. After falling behind by 7 points early seven minutes into the game, the Cardinal roared back and outscored the Lady Vols by 26 points the rest of the way. Congrats to Tara and her team on a great performance!
Could be, but I've not seen the woman run from much in her life.Pat cancelled the series for one reason and one reason only. She didn't want to sign up for a bunch of losses to the likes of Maya, Tina and others so she bailed. She's the one who cheated; herself, the team and the fans.
Boy , no kidding there...looked like they knew they hadn't prepared for the right kind of game.Tennessee just looked tired and miserable at the game, they didn't know what to do. I thought this was Tennessee's game since they have better players but i guess not.....
And that is the proof that everything has changed significantly in Pat's life.Nnemkadi 19 for 27, 42 points. 16 rebounds final 97 - 80 as Pat sat calmly on the bench.
thats crazy... how many did she have against UConn and who was guarding her, FARIS?For all the supposed athleticism of TN they had absolutely no answer for Nneka.
thats crazy... how many did she have against UConn and who was guarding her, FARIS?
DC, yes, most often it was Faris. TN has players that are 6'1-6'4" (Manning, Baugh, Johnson, Stricklen) all according to LV fans supposedly more athletic than Faris who at 5'11" was covering a player 3" taller.thats crazy... how many did she have against UConn and who was guarding her, FARIS?
That m.o. was the way she played in the McDonald's game and every time I have seen her. She is a shoot first player and for that reason an ill fit for a point guard. When she is hot she can be devastating but most nights less so and when she is not she is, also, devastating but not to the team intended as she continues to shoot. The only answer is to get her off the court. Onhte other hand Bass at a generous 5'2" was hardly the answer against the trees of Stanford.I do think Tenn is better with Mass. Simmons is a black hole and appears to divide the team in my opinion. She promotes the come down and jack up a shot offense. This game made the coaching staff look bad in my opinion.