doggydaddy
Grampysorus Rex
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 6,008
- Reaction Score
- 8,970
That's about it. The link to the video was in a copyrighted article, but the video wasn't password or otherwise protected. So anyone anywhere who knew the link, which DD had posted here, could watch the video. As a result of this incident, Maria found a more secure host for the videos intended only for her premium subscribers.
For our part, we exercise care about copyrighted materials. Links to such materials posted on the internet are OK, as are brief quotations with acknowledgement. Wholesale reproduction of large parts, or all, of a copyrighted piece are not OK. We post reminders of these rules from time to time.
In this case, there was a specific precedent raising the issue. DD had posted a large excerpt from an article on the Lady Vols. I inquired where it came from, and he said from the Tennessee premium site. I took the article down. Writers are entitled to be paid for premium content, and they can't allow it to be disseminated for free by their subscribers to non-subscribers.
When this linked video episode came along, however, we had no reason to take any particular note of it. It was just a link to YouTube. For her part, Maria viewed it as a repeat offense by DD and reacted strongly both on her board and by filing an FBI complaint. She withdrew the complaint shortly thereafter, which is why, DD, you never heard anything.
We had some discussions with her at the time as to how we could communicate better if a problem arose on one of the boards.
For the record, and I hate to put even a slight damper on the Boneyard hilarity in this matter, the involvement of the FBI with intellectual property theft is not preposterous, although such involvement in a case like this would be in that realm.
Copyright infringements are generally dealt with in civil lawsuits. Here's a discussion by the Copyright Office, which is probably more than most people want to know. The relevant point in that discussion is that there are two units of the FBI that do investigate intellectual property crimes.
While one can call the local FBI office and be routed, there is also an Internet Crime Complaint Center which allows one to file a complaint online. I believe this is what Maria did.
Complaints filed in this manner are mainly aimed at triggering investigations of consumer fraud. A criminal infringement matter involving the FBI would likely involve product patent or trademark infringement, especially international, to the potential detriment of consumers.
As far as videos, the FBI has been involved with large-scale movie piracy.
One supposes a complaint involving video of a Lady Vols press conference, allegedly "pirated" by pointing to its location on the public YouTube, would be something less than a top priority for the Bureau. So for those inclined to giggle at the idea of FBI involvement in this case, to that extent they can feel free.
I totally agree that piracey of private content is something that the FBI needs to be involved with. I just want to make sure that everyone understands that:
1. I posted a link to a free site (youtube) and the content was not secured in any way.
2. Yes, I posted a piece of a premium article. And the board had no issues that is did that until Maria contacted JS, I believe and complained about it. While it might have been too much of the article, I believe Maria was upset because I used what she wrote to show how much of a shill she was/is for Tennessee. She wrote a scathing article on the referees in one particular game.
3. Maria went on and on about how I am a "serial copywrite infringer" based on the cut and paste from one article, and then the link to the video.
4. I have been posting on this board and it's reincarnations over time for 14 years. I understand posting articles and not the link is wrong. And I certainly understand premium content.
I just hate how I was made out to be the bad guy on this. I did NOTHING wrong and while she withdrew her FBI complaint, they would have laughed her out of the office based on the fact that the video was posted on a public site with no security.
They can have their own private little world with their fake threads about recruiting, their insults to Geno, UConn, me, Tony, and whoever else they deem inferior to their holier than thou program. It won't change the fact that they are petty, insecure, paranoid and overall moronic.
Maybe another 9-10 loss season will bring them some humility, but I doubt it.