The Question which won’t go away | Page 5 | The Boneyard

The Question which won’t go away

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chief00
  • Start date Start date
I think you should listen again - the Wake thing was context but the question was about Crocker and his worse rated defense in the country.

1) Cites context
2) Tells me to "listen again"

Reporter: “Wake Forest just fired their defensive coordinator. I’m just curious about your philosophy on that.

Edsall: “What does that have to do with us? I’m done. I can see where this is going. I’m not — I’m done.

Show me where he's asked about Crocker or the UConn defense in that question. Maybe you need to listen again, Chief
 
My understanding is we are dead last in the country per key defensive metrics - what more do you need to know?
Yeah, we sprinkle in a few good plays but not nearly enough.
But on the good plays is our technique good or is it luck?
Because if the technique was good then who did they learn it from?
 
But on the good plays is our technique good or is it luck?
Because if the technique was good then who did they learn it from?

Guys with bad form/technique make good plays. Taliek Brown had terrible shooting form and Ben Gordon great form. But Taliek didn't shoot 0% (ask Pittsburg) and Ben didn't shoot 100%. Bad technique players make good plays, just not as often as good technique players.
 
No attack Pal, he walked out of a presser with the last question being asked having nothing to do with his team. That or even one on our schedule.
To compare this to his original walking out on the team and the school is simply a thought process you should think about to say the least. Head bang



If you can't forgive and forget, pick one. Find an experience in your own life to get over it. Anyone following the program knows there was a ton of dog poop going on behind the scenes between Randy and Hathaway at the time. Something I should say Randy has always taken the high road on and never expounded to the public on.
Really hope you can find a way to get over it, good luck and GO DOGS!!!

I have already said on this thread I forgive Randy. But I won't forget. I'm not upset. I wish him every success.

Look, we all know who Randy is. He has grown a little since he was last here but he is the same guy. He is the guy who refused to change the lousy punt protection even as the blocks piled up year after year. When he finally, changed it, punts stopped being blocked. But his stubbornness cost us games over the years because he had dug in his heels.

He is the guy that would thank the coaches first after every win. And blame execution (players) after every loss. During his first stint, he didn't understand or care about the media, he thought it was a nuisance and never learned how to use it for his benefit. And we know he set one standard for his players and another for himself.

On the field, he is cautious. He comes from the bend but don't break, keep everything in front of you, play not to lose mold. He often uses the offense to protect his defense.

Randy has some very good traits. He genuinely cares about the kids and helping them succeed off the field and grow as men. His own reputation is spotless, he handles himself with class. He is a good man.

His ability to look at high school kids and project their development is terrific. At a place like UConn that is necessity. He then develops players, makes them better.

His teams play hard (if not always well). He has proven he can win here. He is a good coach.

The good news is that he knows he made a mistake. He has owned up to walking out of the press conference. I don't think the old Randy would have. Like I said, he has grown. But he flashed the old Randy in the press conference. I wasn't surprised. And I was reminded.
 
Guys with bad form/technique make good plays. Taliek Brown had terrible shooting form and Ben Gordon great form. But Taliek didn't shoot 0% (ask Pittsburg) and Ben didn't shoot 100%. Bad technique players make good plays, just not as often as good technique players.
I agree with you here on this point.

But disagree with the overall point made by Chief. I believe these players are being taught proper technique but the inexperience and lack of strength at the moment are contributing to inconsistent play.
 
.-.
I don't believe Crocker is the problem, the overall plan to bring in someone who seemed married to the 3-3-5, only to scrap that plan so quickly seems flawed. I'm fine with it from the sense that I think its easier to recruit for the for the 4-3, for a program like ours, but it reeks of making it up as you go along when all we heard last year was we only had enough players for a 3 man front.

This is tough in the sense that they ask you to come out and support the team but are told if you don't like the results tough sh!@.
 
I don't believe Crocker is the problem, the overall plan to bring in someone who seemed married to the 3-3-5, only to scrap that plan so quickly seems flawed. I'm fine with it from the sense that I think its easier to recruit for the for the 4-3, for a program like ours, but it reeks of making it up as you go along when all we heard last year was we only had enough players for a 3 man front.

This is tough in the sense that they ask you to come out and support the team but are told if you don't like the results tough sh!@.
It probably is easier for us to recruit to the 3-3-5 after there is already a roster of capable players. Switching to the 4-2/4-3 right now to me just means the staff (or just Randy) thinks that our best players right now don't fit the scheme. It'll be interesting to see if crocker comes back and if he does, what defense we run next year.
 
It probably is easier for us to recruit to the 3-3-5 after there is already a roster of capable players. Switching to the 4-2/4-3 right now to me just means the staff (or just Randy) thinks that our best players right now don't fit the scheme. It'll be interesting to see if crocker comes back and if he does, what defense we run next year.
I think it's easier to find 245 to 255lb athletes that can rush the passer, than 285lb yo 300lb ends that can occupy blockers and provide qb pressure as well. Those hybrid DE/DT go to Alabama, Stanford and Wisconsin. Just my opinion.
 
I think it's easier to find 245 to 255lb athletes that can rush the passer, than 285lb yo 300lb ends that can occupy blockers and provide qb pressure as well. Those hybrid DE/DT go to Alabama, Stanford and Wisconsin. Just my opinion.
Eh with a proper weight training and nutrition program you can take a kid that's 250 and get him up to 300. It just takes more than an off season. Randy has moved plenty of tight ends to tackle. It's basically the same thing
 
Eh with a proper weight training and nutrition program you can take a kid that's 250 and get him up to 300. It just takes more than an off season. Randy has moved plenty of tight ends to tackle. It's basically the same thing
I disagree. DL in general are the hardest to project and recruit. I think it's far easier to find a kid like Beavers who played safety in HS and put enough good weight on him that that he could be a 250lb effective end. 300lb guys who can generate a pass rush are a challenge to find even in the NFL.
 
.-.
I disagree. DL in general are the hardest to project and recruit. I think it's far easier to find a kid like Beavers who played safety in HS and put enough good weight on him that that he could be a 250lb effective end. 300lb guys who can generate a pass rush are a challenge to find even in the NFL.
We'll see I guess. I honestly don't have a preference either way. Just don't give up a metric ton of points.
 
I disagree. DL in general are the hardest to project and recruit. I think it's far easier to find a kid like Beavers who played safety in HS and put enough good weight on him that that he could be a 250lb effective end. 300lb guys who can generate a pass rush are a challenge to find even in the NFL.
Yet UConn has had their share of big defensive lineman who have made their way to the NFL, Fatukasi, Stephen, Reyes, and plenty of good college players like Jesse Joseph, Tyvon Martin, BJ McBride (who went to Philly's camp) and currently Travis Jones.
 
Yet UConn has had their share of big defensive lineman who have made their way to the NFL, Fatukasi, Stephen, Reyes, and plenty of good college players like Jesse Joseph, Tyvon Martin, BJ McBride (who went to Philly's camp) and currently Travis Jones.
All tackles for us. Fatukasi did play some end, but was far more effective inside for us, particularly he manhandled UCFs center last year. Reyes was great for us as a DT but his transition to end in the NFL had mixed results at best.
 
But on the good plays is our technique good or is it luck?
Because if the technique was good then who did they learn it from?

I think you missed the boat. There are not a lot of good defensive plays when you are giving up 664 yards per game. LOL
 
.-.
. What a monster you have become. You are way overstepping on the football board.
Mike Francesa wannabe? Mike Francesa syndrome? Or is he or she really Big Mike the narcissistic egotistical blow hard? ;)
 
Last edited:
Diaco has won a national award as LB coach at ND, was he a good head coach? Was he a good defensive coordinator at Nebraska?
 
And you continue to miss the boat
They’re young

He’s also missing that out of 78 plays for cuse 11 went for 404 yards meaning on 67 plays cuse only put up 232 yards (3.4 ypp). So there were more good plays than chief wants to admit to.
 
.-.
He’s also missing that out of 78 plays for cuse 11 went for 404 yards meaning on 67 plays cuse only put up 232 yards (3.4 ypp). So there were more good plays than chief wants to admit to.
Yeah, that was a terrible offensive performance. Lets take the 11 big plays out and at 3.4 yards a play you get a first down every 3 plays. I would like to see an analysis of other football games if you took 11 big plays out. Every DC would love to have that gift. This is surreal.
 
Yet UConn has had their share of big defensive lineman who have made their way to the NFL, Fatukasi, Stephen, Reyes, and plenty of good college players like Jesse Joseph, Tyvon Martin, BJ McBride (who went to Philly's camp) and currently Travis Jones.

Am I the only one who has been extremely underwhelmed by Travis Jones' play? I know the kid will be good one day for us, but as of right now, he is by far the slowest lineman off the ball, and seems to me like is not in his assignment. I'm not sure how he has been getting time over a guy like Murphy, who has been a good player for us and even challenged Fatukasi for playing time last year.
 
Am I the only one who has been extremely underwhelmed by Travis Jones' play? I know the kid will be good one day for us, but as of right now, he is by far the slowest lineman off the ball, and seems to me like is not in his assignment. I'm not sure how he has been getting time over a guy like Murphy, who has been a good player for us and even challenged Fatukasi for playing time last year.
I thought Travis Jones played well today. There were a few plays were he just stuffed the run. Another where he threw his blocker back on the QB. He is starting to improve his explosion off the line of scrimmage. Typically, he’s the guy who gets doubled teamed and that tells you something - especially as a freshman. Travis also displayed some nastiness today - something Chief00 likes to see but not characteristic of his personality.
 
Unless this team now wins out in the next 5, I can’t see them keeping both Dunn or Crocker next season.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,160
Messages
4,555,220
Members
10,438
Latest member
UConnheart


Top Bottom