Reminds me of when he walked out on the team.
I was gonna make this point as well. Its Jim Fuller for crying out loud.Tad surprised he tee’d off on Fuller - would have thought he would have a bit more latitude. He’s not known to be a “gotcha” type media guy.
I'm not upset. Just noting it. I forgive him but I won't forget. It's why I am skeptical when he lectures about accountability. I found his reaction to be completely in character.Remaining upset about that makes you look very childish.
Lol at phrase"the noted lunatic Diaco".
How does this have 19.6k views in a span of a few hours? Did someone big time pick this clip up?
After looking at recent photos of HCRE, the question I'd like to ask is: "You're 60 years old. You have virtually no wrinkles. What skin product(s) are you using?"
Well that explains my face and the crepe paper under my eyes. Thanks.Maybe none. Men tend to develop facial wrinkles far less than women of the same age due to shaving, which exfoliates the skin. You typically have to look at a man's eyes to accurately judge age, since they don't shave there and the wrinkles develop sooner.
Maybe none. Men tend to develop facial wrinkles far less than women of the same age due to shaving, which exfoliates the skin. You typically have to look at a man's eyes to accurately judge age, since they don't shave there and the wrinkles develop sooner.
The power of Chief.
Let me give my friend Randy some public media advice. If he stood there and answered it in a boring way, it would not be getting 19k hits. By walking out on it - that makes it news.
Uconn’s own game notes undermines the youth excuse by detailing how several other programs are similarly young...but aren’t having nearly the some level of performance issues.
I guess it would depend on where the youngsters are playing (Special Teams versus starting on Defense/Offense) - no?
>>YOUTH OF A NATION - The UConn Huskies have relied on a youth movement to eat up the majority of the playing time in 2018. The Huskies have played 34 underclassmen (Freshmen, Redshirt Freshmen and Sophomores) this season which ranks 12th in the nation.
The list of school through four weeks is below:
Georgia 55
Colorado 48
Coastal Carolina 42
Clemson 41
Auburn 40
USC 39
Minnesota 39
Oregon 38
Indiana 37
Duke 36
Wake Forest 35
UConn 34<<
Personally, my gut tells me it’s more than just youth. For reasons, discussed in various previous threads, I am skeptical on Crocker. But, it’s a reasonable argument and there will be improvement - the question is how much?
My concern is not only guys being in the wrong place or being too slow or weak. It’s an absence of good coached technique. The angles of the DB and not knowing where the ball is. The DL’s don’t get low enough and don’t fire off the ball.
I could go on but there appears to be a mix audience, based on feedback, regarding the desire to take a deep dive on technique. To Chief you start every play using technique and often end a play with technique. So if your technique is bad - it definitely impacts results.
Try shaving up to the lashes.Well that explains my face and the crepe paper under my eyes. Thanks.
Saw a lot of blue checkmarks tweeting this video out, got picked up by some prominent digital outlets
Brent Axe on Twitter
UConn head coach Randy Edsall storms out of presser
Yahoo Sports College Football on Twitter
Exactly. This is about degrees of bad; not ordinary bad. The youth, the new system, etc. all are valid to a point. Being the worst by orders of deviation from even the bottom 1/8th of FBS over an extended period is a real issue. Hell, if we had the 110th worst defense, we would be substantially better... even almost competitive.Uconn’s own game notes undermines the youth excuse by detailing how several other programs are similarly young...but aren’t having nearly the some level of performance issues.