Coming here to voice all the same frustrations you guys laid out. Can not believe that Diaz only got 3 year and it wasn't with the Mets. With the richest owner in the sport and only costing you 3 years, I can't fathom how the Mets didn't top that offer. He has been fantastic for the Mets, is a fan favorite, has been reliable, he's only 32...I just don't get why you wouldn't give him 3 years. If they got him at 5 years, I totally get it. But 3?
Feels like now we need another reliable arm in the pen, a 1B, a CF and/or LF, a top line starter and probably a Dan Hurley.