- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,169
- Reaction Score
- 426,348
They can get in line - what’s a few more lawsuits @ this point.
The House case
- Thread starter nelsonmuntz
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,610
- Reaction Score
- 51,588
It sounds like the other 27, represented ny the NCAA, agreed to this. So either they fire those representatives or they pay the agreed upon settlement no?
That is how little the P5 think of the other 27 conferences. They don't even let them in the room to hear what is being discussed. They basically dictated terms and NCAA guys representing the other schools said "sounds good to me."
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,610
- Reaction Score
- 51,588
They are the NCAA. They need to fire the suits selling them out. They're clearly being overpaid.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,497
- Reaction Score
- 12,109
How do the NCAA by laws work for large issues like this? Do they have simple majority or two-thirds, or three-quarters voting rules?
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,169
- Reaction Score
- 426,348
We see your alternate plan proposal and piss on it:
.-.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,489
- Reaction Score
- 39,105
Worked pretty well in the Alston and House cases.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2011
- Messages
- 3,216
- Reaction Score
- 10,670
Where (whose pockets) is the 2.77 billion dollars going?
Fishy
Elite Premium Poster
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 19,182
- Reaction Score
- 177,294
Players past and future.
Damages for past players, revenue sharing for future players.
Basically, our end will be around $7M for the past damages; the BE distributes about $4.5-4.7M per year, now it will be closer to $4M even. (Probably best case scenario - the television contract expires in a year and the exclusive window has come and gone with no deal.)
The revenue sharing part of the deal is opt-in and likely beyond our means and then some.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,497
- Reaction Score
- 12,109
I wonder if the P2 are trying to force/push this so as to prepare everyone for a P2 breakaway in the years ahead? Force the divorce kind of thing.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,169
- Reaction Score
- 426,348
… and lawyers. Lots and lots of lawyers.
So four conferences are paying 40% of $1.66B and the other 27 conferences are paying 60% of $1.66B This doesn't seem like a great resolution for lower tier teams in power conferences who don't have near the revenues of Texas or Alabama or Michigan. It's also really bad for the low majors whose conferences will basically see zero revenue from the NCAA for 10 years.
.-.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,489
- Reaction Score
- 39,105
The smart move by the non-football conferences would be to simply stop the settlement. File an injunction preventing the NCAA from approving any settlement. The Big East isn't a named defendant in the House lawsuit. Let the P4 sweat.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,489
- Reaction Score
- 39,105
In a negotiation, never put someone in a position where they have nothing to lose by continuing to fight you.
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,774
- Reaction Score
- 6,903
I'll admit, I've been too busy to follow the nuances of this situation. But it does seem to be a potential game changer. This would be a big hit to UConn, yet we'd probably have to pay up and shut up to potentially reserve a seat during the next conference shake up.
These splits seem so arbitrary. Why would the ACC and Big 12 agree to pay as much as the SEC and Big Ten when everyone knows how much more the latter make. And, while we complain about UConn's situation, what about low major teams? If I'm a Patriot League or Northeast Conference school getting hit up for the same amount as the Big East or even the American, I'm saying no way. The revenues at the low majors can't be nearly as much as the Big East.
These splits seem so arbitrary. Why would the ACC and Big 12 agree to pay as much as the SEC and Big Ten when everyone knows how much more the latter make. And, while we complain about UConn's situation, what about low major teams? If I'm a Patriot League or Northeast Conference school getting hit up for the same amount as the Big East or even the American, I'm saying no way. The revenues at the low majors can't be nearly as much as the Big East.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,610
- Reaction Score
- 51,588
Couldn't this be exactly what the P5 wants with such a move? They can basically say we will pay the whole settlement but we are breaking away. Anyone that wants to move with us can but you now have to pay a larger amount since there less schools paying the total amount? I'm spitballing, but there has to be a reason why the NCAA stands by and watches the non P5 schools get clearly shafted. Collectively they get around 10 percent of revenues but are being told to pay 60 percent of the settlement, and the NCAA reps are okay signing off on this?
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 3,497
- Reaction Score
- 12,109
how about splitting the House settlement within the P5-6 and G5 along the lines of the CFP revenue monies ratio? Then, split the remaining nut across the rest of D1, D2, D3 schools evenly. Seems much fairer than what the P2-driven proposal is.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,610
- Reaction Score
- 51,588
Yeah that seems fair. No one seems interested in fair. Although D2 and D3 should be exempted from this altogether.
.-.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 29,698
- Reaction Score
- 47,043
The schools were just following NCAA rules and now they have to settle.
The NCAA should be picking up the lions share of this. All that money they have been pocketing over the years can now be used to defray the costs to the conferences.
The burden placed on the conferences should be proportional to the payouts received by the NCAA.
The NCAA should be picking up the lions share of this. All that money they have been pocketing over the years can now be used to defray the costs to the conferences.
The burden placed on the conferences should be proportional to the payouts received by the NCAA.
nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 46,489
- Reaction Score
- 39,105
All the Catastrophists on this board (about 50% of you) need to remember that the NCAA/P4 has lost EVERY SINGLE TIME THEY HAVE BEEN SUED by anyone credible. This is not even a grey area legally, the P4 is legally toast without a Congressional Hail Mary giving the P4 and NCAA a Safe Harbor. The most divided Supreme Court since before the Civil War ruled 9-0 in the Alston case that college athletics is an ongoing anti-trust violation, which makes it unlikely they will even hear another anti-trust case, they will just refer to the Alston precedent. The House plaintiffs have a gun against the P4's head demanding a settlement now, or they are going to court in a case that the P4 is GUARANTEED TO LOSE.
Now the Catastrophists are saying that the ongoing anti-trust violation P4 is going to walk away from everyone else if the non-P4 schools do not cover a $1 billion settlement? Let the P4 walk. UConn could end up with their NIL budget covered by Ohio State and Alabama for the next 20 years.
This is not a remotely complicated decision. The best move by the Big East is to threaten to block the settlement. The P4 are named in the suit, the Big East isn't, and if the House case goes to court, it is going to end up being a lot worse than $2.8 billion.
Now the Catastrophists are saying that the ongoing anti-trust violation P4 is going to walk away from everyone else if the non-P4 schools do not cover a $1 billion settlement? Let the P4 walk. UConn could end up with their NIL budget covered by Ohio State and Alabama for the next 20 years.
This is not a remotely complicated decision. The best move by the Big East is to threaten to block the settlement. The P4 are named in the suit, the Big East isn't, and if the House case goes to court, it is going to end up being a lot worse than $2.8 billion.
Drew
Its a post, about nothing!
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2013
- Messages
- 8,124
- Reaction Score
- 30,057
You should write Val a strongly worded letter and see what she says
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 103,169
- Reaction Score
- 426,348
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,774
- Reaction Score
- 6,903
Yeah, I don't get the numbers. The P4 probably had 80% of the revenue. UConn should be playing both sides like our Big East brethren did before sticking a shiv in our back. "P4... if you want us on your side, get us in one of your doors right now. No future promises." Whether the ACC is worth joining is a different conversation.
What happens if the P4 separates? The only harm to most schools would be the NCAA Basketball Tournament, no? Agreeing to be part of this settlement doesn't stop the P4 from blowing that up when they feel like it anyway. So, at a minimum, the non-P4 better get an agreement in place from the P4 to keep the tournament for the next 20 years or something.
I'd think that by the time you get to most FCS programs (their football and other sport revenues), the revenue sharing that would go to the players would be less than the scholarship they were given. If I gave you a scholarship of $80k - $150 per year (room, board, other food and perks, insurance, tutoring, gear, etc.), that would be offset from any revenue I share with you. If you don't like it, just be a normal student and pay your own way (and you may not have gotten in to the school). So why would any of those non-P4 teams agree to anything, especially if they weren't named in the suit (taking your word).
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 21,610
- Reaction Score
- 51,588
Just look at @huskymedic post above yours. The other 27 conferences who make up the NCAA, are agreeing to the settlement via their board of directors/governors. They gonna sue themselves or are they gonna replace these folks doing the talking for them? There has to be a reason they're agreeing to this that we don't have information because o the surface it makes no sense.
.-.