St. John’s next on Wednesday | Page 2 | The Boneyard

St. John’s next on Wednesday

Yea but UConn wouldn’t have played Notre Dame or Maryland using Kim’s scheduling. They’d be 15-0 without wins over Texas, NC State, Duke, Princeton, Florida State and a few others. And they wouldn’t have games against USC or Tennesse coming up. I think all UConn fans would rather have a couple of loses with this schedule than undefeated against LSUs.
In addition we do not have the same realistic scheduling options as other Power 5 conference standouts. They can get a competitive schedule in their conference, and if they want to make it tougher with out of conference games that is their choice.TThey can also use out of conference games as an extended training camp, developing freshmen and playing certain combinations to prepare them for the games that will count in conference.

We don't have that choice. Since we are not in a Power 5 conference the only way to upgrade strength of schedule similar to theirs is to front load a very difficult out of conference schedule. We also don't have time to ease into it and get players comfortable with the team and their roles before the big games, they are thrown into the fire right away.

If a player isn't rotation ready by the season start, they likely won't get many opportunity minutes to earn their way into the rotation until we get more blowouts with mop up minutes during conference games. If they do well enough in those show me minutes, they might then get into the rotation by the time the conference and NCAA tournaments begin.

My main point is the scheduling scenario is fundamentally different for us or any top ranked team not from a Power 5 conference. They back load the difficult (conference) schedule, we have to front load it or not have a difficult schedule at all. They get a great deal of development time before their big games, we get ours more afterwards in the easier conference matchups.

It's apples and oranges and unless we join a Power 5 conference it will probably stay that way. Do I wish we could bring some players along slowly and get them ready before the big games later? Sure but that isn't a realistic option, because if we didn't front load difficult out of conference games, we might not face serious challenges until we were several rounds into the NCAA tournament facing our first true test. That would not be good and the season would be somewhat boring until the tournament began. It is what it is, and like injuries we just have to deal with it.
 
If they have the game, awesome. It should be very interesting. St John's is one of the many surprising teams this season. If there is a game. Cool. If no game. Even better. I am just going to kick back and play the wait and see game. I just want our UConn players and coaching staff to get better health wise.
 
I can’t believe that there is a possibility of the game being canceled. My daughter bought me tickets for Christmas. It will be the first game that I ever see in person so to have it postponed is crushing. I don’t know when it will be rescheduled, and if I’ll be able to make that game. I will be absolutely devastated If the game is postponed. So whoever is in touch with the basketball, gods say a good word for an old guy looking to see his first game. Fingers crossed
 
I would predict Wednesday's game gets postponed too. Probably won't play until Sunday. Full week of recovery would do them good.
 
guess this means either tenn or sc game will get cancelled. Idk how they'll decide that, I assume they'd want to keep SC.
It would depend on what days the two teams have available to play, and if the dates fall on the game days of Tennessee of South Carolina then they would most likely get canceled.
 
It would depend on what days the two teams have available to play, and if the dates fall on the game days of Tennessee of South Carolina then they would most likely get canceled.
Both teams have games that weekend.
 
.-.
At this point I see no other option but to have to cancel the Tenn. game. Series will continue next year. WCBB will go on. The top priority is to get these young ladies healthy then 2nd priority is making up conference games.
 
The AD said it might get postponed like the DePaul game.
Doesn’t sound like that’s the case based on what Benedict said.
Not sure exactly what your source of information is. I just read a lengthy article in CT Insider from today that quoted Benedict extensively. His only reference to any games beyond the DePaul game was that they would evaluate the situation on Sunday & Monday. As far as I know, Benedict hasn’t made any other public statements.

Unless you know something more definitive, I would suggest that we all avoid speculation on the health and availability of various players beyond what’s announced by representatives of the University.
 
All the Uconn fans have to do is relax, when no game, read a good book and revel in the team when we do play again. All these glitches in Uconn's schedule is talking points when we win the Big East conference and championship. Talking points to brag how we overcame bad breaks and injuries and still won. As I have been saying all last year, THINK POSITIVE and it will happen. GO HUSKIES!!!
 
Not sure exactly what your source of information is. I just read a lengthy article in CT Insider from today that quoted Benedict extensively. His only reference to any games beyond the DePaul game was that they would evaluate the situation on Sunday & Monday. As far as I know, Benedict hasn’t made any other public statements.

Unless you know something more definitive, I would suggest that we all avoid speculation on the health and availability of various players beyond what’s announced by representatives of the University.
Lol you are saying the same thing as me but just on a high horse. He said they’ll decide after some health evaluations today and tomorrow, which means the game might get postponed. Unless you read a quote where he said they weren’t going to consider postpone and are definitely playing in Wednesday?

Last week Azzi was even cleared for full practices according to CD so it seems highly unlikely she’ll be playing this week. Unless you think CD isn’t a representative of the University?
 
In addition we do not have the same realistic scheduling options as other Power 5 conference standouts. They can get a competitive schedule in their conference, and if they want to make it tougher with out of conference games that is their choice.TThey can also use out of conference games as an extended training camp, developing freshmen and playing certain combinations to prepare them for the games that will count in conference.

We don't have that choice. Since we are not in a Power 5 conference the only way to upgrade strength of schedule similar to theirs is to front load a very difficult out of conference schedule. We also don't have time to ease into it and get players comfortable with the team and their roles before the big games, they are thrown into the fire right away.

If a player isn't rotation ready by the season start, they likely won't get many opportunity minutes to earn their way into the rotation until we get more blowouts with mop up minutes during conference games. If they do well enough in those show me minutes, they might then get into the rotation by the time the conference and NCAA tournaments begin.

My main point is the scheduling scenario is fundamentally different for us or any top ranked team not from a Power 5 conference. They back load the difficult (conference) schedule, we have to front load it or not have a difficult schedule at all. They get a great deal of development time before their big games, we get ours more afterwards in the easier conference matchups.

It's apples and oranges and unless we join a Power 5 conference it will probably stay that way. Do I wish we could bring some players along slowly and get them ready before the big games later? Sure but that isn't a realistic option, because if we didn't front load difficult out of conference games, we might not face serious challenges until we were several rounds into the NCAA tournament facing our first true test. That would not be good and the season would be somewhat boring until the tournament began. It is what it is, and like injuries we just have to deal with it.
Thanks oldhuskie. An EXCELLENT and detailed explanation of the reason(s) Geno cannot ever afford to play weak non-conference opponents. :cool:
 
.-.
Hoops, yea, but nothing. :confused:You're trying to move the goalposts here. Read my comment again:

"Mulkey and LSU is currently 15-0. I know some of us like to question her OCC scheduling practices, but as I repeatedly and continuously say, Kim knows what she's doing. LSU is currently ranked #7, has been projected to get a top seed in the NACCT, and is currently (as I write this) handing Kentucky their butt 53-27 at the end of 3. That game is AT Kentucky.

Her M.O. may not work for everyone, but it worked for her at Baylor, and it's working for her now. It's a good bet that she (a lioness) is not concerned with the opinions of fans (sheep), not even her own. So.......there. :oops: How many other D1 WCBB coaches would like to be 15-0 at this point in the season? We ALL know the answer to THAT question. :) UConn Nation would like to be 15-0 right now. That would mean wins over Maryland and @ Notre Dame."


I didn't say, suggest or mention anything about UConn playing a cupcake schedule. I said that we, as a fan base would like to be 15-0, and we would.

Right now, we're 11-2. 13-0 sounds much better than 11-2 right? 15-0 would sound even better. We would be undefeated. I challenge you to name one D1 WCBB coach that WOULD NOT like to be undefeated at this point in the season. They ALL would. That's all I'm saying. No worries. Geno has never and will never subscribe to the idea of filling out his out of conference schedule (OCC) schedule with bakery products (Twinkees, Ding dongs and Ho ho's). It's not his way. :)
Correction: UConn record is 13-2, not 11-2.

1673240556677.png
 
The UConn AD said that in order to play, UConn needs to have 7 players who are healthy enough to play 30 minutes each.
He said that Azzi or another player coming off of concussion protocol wouldn't be expected to play 30 minutes their first game back from injury.
UConn needs 7 healthy players that can play without limits before they can play another game.

Sun: Thank you for injecting some realism here. Somewhere along the line someone gave an estimate of Azzi returning in 3 to 6 weeks and some Boneyarders are adamantly holding to that date. The 3 to 6 week date was probably made by the same person who estimated Dorka would be out for 3 games. As far as makeup dates for any postponed games everyone should take an objective look at UConn’s upcoming schedule and the schedules of any the other teams whose games will be postponed. There is little or no flexibility for inserting new game dates and I wouldn’t expect Big East schedulers (who can schedule 2 home games back to back) to find a solution.

 
Somehow my reply to Sun ended up in the section where his/her original comments are repeated. If someone can fix this please do. I really shouldn’t make posts from an iPhone at 3 AM.
 
The UConn AD said that in order to play, UConn needs to have 7 players who are healthy enough to play 30 minutes each.
He said that Azzi or another player coming off of concussion protocol wouldn't be expected to play 30 minutes their first game back from injury.
UConn needs 7 healthy players that can play without limits before they can play another game.

Edwards, Senechal, Nika, Dorka, Patterson, Deberry and Bettencort (sp?)- isn’t that seven? Or is Edwards considered injured with her foot/ankle?
 
Lol you are saying the same thing as me but just on a high horse. He said they’ll decide after some health evaluations today and tomorrow, which means the game might get postponed. Unless you read a quote where he said they weren’t going to consider postpone and are definitely playing in Wednesday?

Last week Azzi was even cleared for full practices according to CD so it seems highly unlikely she’ll be playing this week. Unless you think CD isn’t a representative of the University?
No, I am not saying anything similar to what you said. You said the AD indicated the SJ game, “might get postponed.” He said nothing of the sort.

You then implied that Azzi might not be ready based on what he said. Arriving at that conclusion from a plan to “evaluate on Sunday & Monday” is an unbelievable stretch on your part.

Again, I don’t recall CD saying anything about Azzi’s activity other than “she looks good” and the decision on her return was, “above my pay grade.” As of last Thursday Azzi had continued to ramp up her activity to the point where she was fully participating in all pregame drills according to the SNY reporter who actually watched pregame drills. That was 4 days ago with another 2 days to go until SJ.

Based on everything we truly know, at this point in time, suggestions that the SJ game might be postponed and that Azzi may not be ready to return are alarmist inferences based on ???
 
From the Courant article:

The team took Saturday off, with several of the players coming to Gampel Pavilion to watch the men’s victory over Creighton. They will practice Sunday, and their status will be evaluated day to day. In order to play their next scheduled game, at St. John’s on Wednesday, they will need to consider how much any returning players can safely play in their first game back.

“We can’t put our kids in a position where they come back from an injury and we’re expecting them to play 30-plus minutes a game,” Benedict said.

For instance, Fudd, who is close to returning, certainly would not be allowed to play 30 or more minutes in her return. Players coming out of concussion protocol must also be carefully monitored.....

 
.-.
From the Courant article:

The team took Saturday off, with several of the players coming to Gampel Pavilion to watch the men’s victory over Creighton. They will practice Sunday, and their status will be evaluated day to day. In order to play their next scheduled game, at St. John’s on Wednesday, they will need to consider how much any returning players can safely play in their first game back.

“We can’t put our kids in a position where they come back from an injury and we’re expecting them to play 30-plus minutes a game,” Benedict said.

For instance, Fudd, who is close to returning, certainly would not be allowed to play 30 or more minutes in her return. Players coming out of concussion protocol must also be carefully monitored.....

The article indicates that the team was set to practice Sunday (yesterday). I am sure that practice was significant in evaluating the relative health of the team in line with prior comments.
 
No, I am not saying anything similar to what you said. You said the AD indicated the SJ game, “might get postponed.” He said nothing of the sort.

You then implied that Azzi might not be ready based on what he said. Arriving at that conclusion from a plan to “evaluate on Sunday & Monday” is an unbelievable stretch on your part.

Again, I don’t recall CD saying anything about Azzi’s activity other than “she looks good” and the decision on her return was, “above my pay grade.” As of last Thursday Azzi had continued to ramp up her activity to the point where she was fully participating in all pregame drills according to the SNY reporter who actually watched pregame drills. That was 4 days ago with another 2 days to go until SJ.

Based on everything we truly know, at this point in time, suggestions that the SJ game might be postponed and that Azzi may not be ready to return are alarmist inferences based on ???
CD said after the Butler game that Azzi is only cleared to do certain drills. Watch the full post game interview.

If they are going to decided today whether they have enough players to play Wednesday it’s a factual observation that that means there is a change Wednesday night get postponed.
 
“We can’t put our kids in a position where they come back from an injury and we’re expecting them to play 30-plus minutes a game,” Benedict said.

For instance, Fudd, who is close to returning, certainly would not be allowed to play 30 or more minutes in her return. Players coming out of concussion protocol must also be carefully monitored.....

A point that should not go unnoticed is that expecting to have players coming back from injury to play 30-plus minutes in a game would not and players with concussion protocol must be carefully monitored. That to me means if they can only play 30 minutes or less we will need players who can replace them. That to me means we many need more players available. 7 players who can play more then 30 minutes and players who can play less then 30 minutes and forbid someone gets injured out of those 7 players we're back at square 1. This injury thing is a mess.
 
We are in a tough position here, and many teams across the country are watching this. We are not the only team with significant injuries, although the number of players out are more than most. If Wednesday's game is postponed, two things will happen, or not happen. One, some bad people will see this as a break for UConn that they may feel is an advantage since the games at this point will be postponed and not cancelled with UConn not receiving a forfeit. Second, what is the policy in the BE if the games cannot be made up. Will it eventually be a forfeit, or just a "game not played". I agree with the BE stance on trying to make the game up, but they don't say what happens if it doesn't. One game is one thing but trying to make up two will be difficult. I would in the long run except a forfeit if our girls aren't ready, but whatever the BE decides can be a presedent for the other leagues to follow, or we will be dammed in the press for being soft and dumb. As I said, if we are not ready than we don't play, so this could be a BE decision that may cause ripples in the WCBB world.
 
We are in a tough position here, and many teams across the country are watching this. We are not the only team with significant injuries, although the number of players out are more than most. If Wednesday's game is postponed, two things will happen, or not happen. One, some bad people will see this as a break for UConn that they may feel is an advantage since the games at this point will be postponed and not cancelled with UConn not receiving a forfeit. Second, what is the policy in the BE if the games cannot be made up. Will it eventually be a forfeit, or just a "game not played". I agree with the BE stance on trying to make the game up, but they don't say what happens if it doesn't. One game is one thing but trying to make up two will be difficult. I would in the long run except a forfeit if our girls aren't ready, but whatever the BE decides can be a presedent for the other leagues to follow, or we will be dammed in the press for being soft and dumb. As I said, if we are not ready than we don't play, so this could be a BE decision that may cause ripples in the WCBB world.
We would most likely make them up, possibly at the disposal of non conference games.
 
Mulkey and LSU is currently 15-0. I know some of us like to question her OCC scheduling practices, but as I repeatedly and continuously say, Kim knows what she's doing. LSU is currently ranked #7, has been projected to get a top seed in the NACCT, and is currently (as I write this) handing Kentucky their butt 53-27 at the end of 3. That game is AT Kentucky.

Her M.O. may not work for everyone, but it worked for her at Baylor, and it's working for her now. It's a good bet that she (a lioness) is not concerned with the opinions of fans (sheep), not even her own. So.......there. :oops: How many other D1 WCBB coaches would like to be 15-0 at this point in the season? We ALL know the answer to THAT question. :) UConn Nation would like to be 15-0 right now. That would mean wins over Maryland and @ Notre Dame.
In all fairness, if UConn replaced Maryland and Notre Dame with some of LSU's OOC cupcakes they took to the back of the shed...UConn would also be at 15-0.

The issue I have currently is how the NET currently does not seem to figure in RPI/SOS to arrive at the NET Rankings. LSU has a NET ranking of #2 (behind South Carolina) Looking at LSU's data below, does it make sense? (Data taken from WarrenNolan.com through games played on Sunday, 01-08-2023)

1673274370424.png
 
.-.
CD said after the Butler game that Azzi is only cleared to do certain drills. Watch the full post game interview.

If they are going to decided today whether they have enough players to play Wednesday it’s a factual observation that that means there is a change Wednesday night get postponed.
The Butler game was 6 days ago. After the Xavier game (4 days ago) CD said Azzi looked good in practice and, as I stated, the SNY reporter indicated that Azzi participated in all pregame warmup drills. Which comments should we give more weight to?
 
The Butler game was 6 days ago. After the Xavier game (4 days ago) CD said Azzi looked good in practice and, as I stated, the SNY reporter indicated that Azzi participated in all pregame warmup drills. Which comments should we give more weight to?
They both sound the same to me, she looks good in whats she is limited to. You don't go from not cleared for full practices to playing a week later with a knee injury. For reference it took Carolina and Dorka 2 weeks to be cleared for full practices and then to play. And thats for a thumb injury and neck stiffness.
 
The Butler game was 6 days ago. After the Xavier game (4 days ago) CD said Azzi looked good in practice and, as I stated, the SNY reporter indicated that Azzi participated in all pregame warmup drills. Which comments should we give more weight to?
Agree that there has been an increase in unsupported and unproductive opinions versus facts re: Azzi. My view is that until Azzi is unrestricted for practice, we will still have a question whether she can play. Doing pregame exercises, mainly layup and passing drills, and participated in some, but not all, practice activities, is far from practicing at full speed.
 
Agree that there has been an increase in unsupported and unproductive opinions versus facts re: Azzi. My view is that until Azzi is unrestricted for practice, we will still have a question whether she can play. Doing pregame exercises, mainly layup and passing drills, and participated in some, but not all, practice activities, is far from practicing at full speed.
Yes, and between today and Wednesday I expect that UConn will fill us all in on the status of each of the walking wounded relative to their availability to play or not in Wednesday’s SJ game.
 
We are in a tough position here, and many teams across the country are watching this. We are not the only team with significant injuries, although the number of players out are more than most. If Wednesday's game is postponed, two things will happen, or not happen. One, some bad people will see this as a break for UConn that they may feel is an advantage since the games at this point will be postponed and not cancelled with UConn not receiving a forfeit. Second, what is the policy in the BE if the games cannot be made up. Will it eventually be a forfeit, or just a "game not played". I agree with the BE stance on trying to make the game up, but they don't say what happens if it doesn't. One game is one thing but trying to make up two will be difficult. I would in the long run except a forfeit if our girls aren't ready, but whatever the BE decides can be a presedent for the other leagues to follow, or we will be dammed in the press for being soft and dumb. As I said, if we are not ready than we don't play, so this could be a BE decision that may cause ripples in the WCBB world.

Yes, UConn is in a tough situation. Injuries happen during any season, but UConn's bench depth suffered considerably with 2 season-ending injuries. Regarding postponed vs forfeit, don't see how the BE can continue to ask UConn's opponents to adjust their schedules for UConn's sake. UConn can forfeit games and still win the BE.
 
I would just like to mention the very, very obvious; games will be played when and if they can be played, made up, whatever. The reason for the obvious motherhood, I think everyone should keep in mind that no one, NO ONE, feels worse about this situation than the players and coaches; we observe, root, disect, praise and criticize from afar; they pour their heart and soul, give their time and hard work every day to the team. Within the confines of basketball, there is NOTHING worse for a player than not being able to play, for whatever reason.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,265
Messages
4,560,452
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom