Well Larrier and Jackson can play the four, I'd argue Jackson is more of a stretch 4 than a 3, but either way this kid would be a great pick up. More of a 3 then a 4 from the highlights I've seen. Depth is key.
Durham has probably a 50% chance of having to redshirt and plays both big man positions. Counting on him to produce this year to the extent that you turn away a top 40 recruit is completely asinine.
Larrier can't play the 4. If he did, it would be more of a 4 guard lineup than anything else. He plays smaller than Hamilton, who wasn't really a 4 at all either. Vance Jackson could play stretch 4 for sure too, but he's definitely going to need to give backup 3 minutes. There will be plenty of PT between the two spots for Justin Jackson, Vance Jackson, and Diarra + Durham (who I could see having foul issues as freshmen).
You're relentlessly delusional, man.
Because you don't pass on a top 50 3/4 when you have 2 open scholarships and SF/PF are your biggest question marks. Rather that than reach for a 5 now when in all likelihood Ollie will be bringing in a top center for 2017 to develop and back up a junior Enoch.
No, I really don't. Never really have gotten into it with anyone on this site. You just are by far the most out of touch person here and you derail every thread you comment in because you are so hopelessly off base. I'm not trying to harp on you, but you need to get a better understanding of the game or you're always going to be calling everyone jerks for correcting you. I'm not going to respond any further, have a good one.
This. So much this.
That picture is frame-worthy in my imaginary UConn themed man cave, pretty high resolution too.
