Rumor- UCONN Pursuing ACC Membership? | Page 12 | The Boneyard

Rumor- UCONN Pursuing ACC Membership?

I’ve been following this thread, though not to the level of detail by posters here.

My quick takeaway is, I hope UConn is actively talking to the B12. I’d take an offer from the B12 in a second.
 
I still would love to know the basis where a majority of the ACC would vote for dissolution.

At a minimum a third of the conference would absolutely lose significantly on stature and economics while another third could only hope that they may be able to break even.

Does anyone believe that a school would vote to damage their athletic future just so FSU and Clemson can make triple the money their school will end up with?
Lots of discussion about this on the syracuse board so it seems many of those fans are accepting the ACC demise.

 
Somewhat CR related.

"Had those communities all remained part of Hartford, the capital city today would have a population of nearly 300,000. This would put it in the population range of Madison, Wisc., Buffalo, N.Y. and Reno, Nev. and make it the second-largest city in New England, surpassing Worcester’s 206,000 and Providence’s 190,000. If just Hartford and East Hartford merged, as Bronin hinted, the city of 171,000 would be far and away the largest in the state, topping Bridgeport’s 150,000."

The fact that the suburbs essentially put all their issues and work into hartofrd, with no county authority, was one of the most horrible and cynical political practices we have seen.

Essentially, towns gave the cities all the social ills and the cost and allowed the suburbs to just by mere a mile away create a universe that is unobtainable.

For example. I live in Farmington. I live about 4.5 to 5 miles from where I grew up in. The difference in life, services, safety is light years different. It is amazing.

Essentially, hartfords biggest issue is it has no land.
 
Lots of discussion about this on the syracuse board so it seems many of those fans are accepting the ACC demise.

Those fans aren't aware enough to realize that we've surpassed them in men's basketball a couple decades ago and we've accomplished considerably more than they ever could have dreamed of.

If that is your bellwether for credibility of this rumor,... well,....
 
Somewhat CR related.

"Had those communities all remained part of Hartford, the capital city today would have a population of nearly 300,000. This would put it in the population range of Madison, Wisc., Buffalo, N.Y. and Reno, Nev. and make it the second-largest city in New England, surpassing Worcester’s 206,000 and Providence’s 190,000. If just Hartford and East Hartford merged, as Bronin hinted, the city of 171,000 would be far and away the largest in the state, topping Bridgeport’s 150,000."

The problem with merging a successfully run municipality with a larger unsuccessfully run one is that it penalizes the successful municipality. Perhaps if Hartford fixes its governance issues such that it no longer requires state aid, a merger might be attractive to other municipalities.
 
The problem with merging a successfully run municipality with a larger unsuccessfully run one is that it penalizes the successful municipality. Perhaps if Hartford fixes its governance issues such that it no longer requires state aid, a merger might be attractive to other municipalities.
Is Hartford not successfully run? Or is It’s issues fatal? I would I argue the later.

And, to be honest, I would let west Hartford residents run Hartford. Who is to say the Hartford political apparatus wins?

Maybe west Hartford takes over. I would be for that. The mentality in this state has preserved a very small town way of living, but the XL Center is the perfect issue to encapsulate the stupidity.

The XL is a Hartford county project. Not a state project. As was the fast track and other improvements. Hartford can’t do it alone, and the state funding is shot down because it isn’t in the best interests of those who will never frequent.

Should have a county political apparatus that can do planning and development. It’s destroyed our state.
 
.-.
The problem with merging a successfully run municipality with a larger unsuccessfully run one is that it penalizes the successful municipality. Perhaps if Hartford fixes its governance issues such that it no longer requires state aid, a merger might be attractive to other municipalities.
They will forever require state aid. Such is life in a small city that can't tax half of its properties and relies on reimbursement by the state.
 
I understand what you're saying. I just think you're wrong. Your thought seems to be to threaten the companies tax incentives if they can't make a third party do something that is actually against the company's best interest (It was against ESPN's best interest to pay pro-rata for any Big XII expansion at the time of Malloy's request). That's much closer to your pinstriped suit analogy than anything I said or any made-up percentage about the likelihood of certain outcomes.

ESPN did put out a model for UConn and Syracuse during the ACC expansion, it was the first and preferred model. The politics within the ACC killed that, that's not something that ESPN could affect without, again doing something against it's best interest and paying a premium for the content if the ACC does something that it's members thought was against their own best interests.

You and I may share the same opinion about the value of corporate tax incentives (and CTs corporate tax structure) :)
Here is where I think differently than you. ESPN put out a model for UConn and Syracuse during ACC expansion, it was the first and preferred model. The politics within the ACC killed that, that's something ESPN COULD affect but didn't. It has nothing to do with ACC best interest. Today, ESPN would have nixed the deal moving forward if that wasn't what they wanted. ESPN chose not to assist UConn. If they said to the ACC, take UConn, they would have.
 
The fact that the suburbs essentially put all their issues and work into hartofrd, with no county authority, was one of the most horrible and cynical political practices we have seen.

Essentially, towns gave the cities all the social ills and the cost and allowed the suburbs to just by mere a mile away create a universe that is unobtainable.

For example. I live in Farmington. I live about 4.5 to 5 miles from where I grew up in. The difference in life, services, safety is light years different. It is amazing.

Essentially, hartfords biggest issue is it has no land.
If Hartford were 4 times the size with 3 times the population its image would be much different to outsiders. It would also actually be much different if it were combined with West Hartford, East Hartford, Whethersfield...Probably even have MLB and NFL teams

Hartford - 120k people, 17.4 square miles
Cincinnati - 309k, 78 sq
St. Louis - 293k, 62 sq
Pittsburgh - 300k, 55 sq
 
If Hartford were 4 times the size with 3 times the population its image would be much different to outsiders. It would also actually be much different if it were combined with West Hartford, East Hartford, Whethersfield...Probably even have MLB and NFL teams

Hartford - 120k people, 17.4 square miles
Cincinnati - 309k, 78 sq
St. Louis - 293k, 62 sq
Pittsburgh - 300k, 55 sq
Heck, if we just renamed the state of Connecticut “Hartford” it would be the third largest city in the nation!
 
Is Hartford not successfully run? Or is It’s issues fatal? I would I argue the later.

And, to be honest, I would let west Hartford residents run Hartford. Who is to say the Hartford political apparatus wins?

Maybe west Hartford takes over. I would be for that. The mentality in this state has preserved a very small town way of living, but the XL Center is the perfect issue to encapsulate the stupidity.

The XL is a Hartford county project. Not a state project. As was the fast track and other improvements. Hartford can’t do it alone, and the state funding is shot down because it isn’t in the best interests of those who will never frequent.

Should have a county political apparatus that can do planning and development. It’s destroyed our state.
The thing is, no one else wants to take on that train wreck. Whenever people “if only” Hartford’s problems it is a tacit concession that the problems are insoluble as they are. It is, in essence, an exercise in “magic thinking” which is more appropriate for toddlers, than for governmental planning.
 
The fact that the suburbs essentially put all their issues and work into hartofrd, with no county authority, was one of the most horrible and cynical political practices we have seen.

Essentially, towns gave the cities all the social ills and the cost and allowed the suburbs to just by mere a mile away create a universe that is unobtainable.
I don't think the towns of Connecticut ever pushed problems into Hartford as there really never was any significant county authority in Connecticut:

"In 1959, a Democrat-controlled legislature voted to end county government, and serving no other purpose but to manage county jails, the last elected position of county governance, the sheriff, was finally discarded in 2000. It’s a popular opinion that county governance is unnecessary because Connecticut is a small state."

In 1950, Hartford had a population that was 40% larger than the population of the 8 towns that surround Hartford. Unfortunately, the deindustrialization of the Northern cities decimated Hartford and similar manufacturing cities and Hartford started to decline.

One of the biggest problems for Hartford is the large amount of untaxed property in the city. ~60% of real estate in Hartford is untaxed. Using all property including autos, etc., ~51% of assets in Hartford are untaxed which is up from ~24% in 1967. The state, by statute, is supposed to reimburse cities for a large portion of the untaxed property revenue losses, but the state has traditionally underpaid. So, yes, I think the state should pay more to Hartford. And given how small Connecticut is, yes, I think the state should support the XL Center.
 
.-.
Heck, if we just renamed the state of Connecticut “Hartford” it would be the third largest city in the nation!
That doesn't make any sense. It would be 10 times the size of New York City.
 
I think the state should support the XL Center.
I was with you up until the last sentence. I’m just not sure the XL Center makes any sense. If someone actually put together a plan that had realistic numbers assigned to it that showed there was an opportunity to recoup further investment in the XL center, I’d be behind it, but it seems like the management style of the CDRA is pretty much “I don’t know, let’s give this a shot” coupled with a concerted effort to hide as much of their ongoing loss as possible in the University of Connecticut. Athletic department budget.
 
That doesn't make any sense. It would be 10 times the size of New York City.
I don’t think so. The total population of Connecticut is what 3 million, 3 1/2 million maybe?
 
The problem with merging a successfully run municipality with a larger unsuccessfully run one is that it penalizes the successful municipality. Perhaps if Hartford fixes its governance issues such that it no longer requires state aid, a merger might be attractive to other municipalities.
The irony is that Hartford needs state aid because of the state. Lots of tax exempt real estate.
 
Hartford (unless things have changed since I worked there in the 1990's) has a disadvantage that few large cities with a reasonable number of white collar jobs have. There are no affluent neighborhoods (high tax base) in the city, they are all in neighboring towns. This makes it far more difficult for the city to support its infrastructure than those it may be in competition with for corporate jobs and a hospitality/entertainment economy.

A second (massive) problem is that what should be it's most valuable real estate (waterfront property)has been taken away by I-95 and the cost to restore it would be astronomical (I'm guess all in could be as much as $50 billion).

More specific to our concerns is the white elephant that is now known as the XL center. There is no logical way to justify continuing to put band aids on the relic, there won't be sufficient benefits from a new arena to warrant the cost yet closing it up would be a near fatal blow to Hartford's economy.

I really don't know what the answer is.
 
I was with you up until the last sentence. I’m just not sure the XL Center makes any sense. If someone actually put together a plan that had realistic numbers assigned to it that showed there was an opportunity to recoup further investment in the XL center, I’d be behind it, but it seems like the management style of the CDRA is pretty much “I don’t know, let’s give this a shot” coupled with a concerted effort to hide as much of their ongoing loss as possible in the University of Connecticut. Athletic department budget.
I agree that investing in rebuilding the XL Center is not a good financial investment, but the right building could be used much more. Hartford should be in the rotation for NCAA tournament games, both men and women, as well as NCAA hockey tournament games as well as more concerts. And, Hartford does not really have much activity and it needs draws to get people into the city and help with the turnaround. I do think the city is turning around with UConn moving in, apartments being built, and the Yard Goats stadium.
 
.-.
My guess: FSU, Clemson, Miami, UNC, UVA, VT, GT, Louisville. BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Duke, NC State, Wake left out. ND is a free agent to plot its own course.

It would be interesting to see how the North Carolina legislature would react to divergent paths for UNC and NC State.

I'd be OK with a reconstituted conference of BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Duke, NC State, Wake, UConn and UMass. All sports. I doubt Duke would look favorably on this, but they might have little choice.
UMASS :)
 
Louisville over NC State?

Leftovers would probably be: BC, Syracuse, Pitt, Duke, Louisville, Wake

Possible additions: UConn, Temple, Memphis, USF, SMU

Extra filler: ECU, UMass

Extra extra filler to stroke Duke's ego: Tulane, Rice, Tulsa

So basically the bottom half of the ACC and the top half of the old AAC (minus Cincy)
We block UMass :)
 
I’ve been following this thread, though not to the level of detail by posters here.

My quick takeaway is, I hope UConn is actively talking to the B12. I’d take an offer from the B12 in a second.
After it was mentioned Pitt could go to the Big12 it got me thinking. If the Pac12 survives, the Big12 could add Pitt, Syracuse, UConn & BC and have an eastern group of 6 with WV & Cincy. I envision UVA & UNC to the BIG & Fl State & Clemson to the SEC. Perhaps the Big 12 takes some ACC leftovers. One thing for sure-changes are coming at some point. I love the BE & MSG and Hockey East but we need a football home and more revenue. Can’t wait for MSG Thursday
 
I was with you up until the last sentence. I’m just not sure the XL Center makes any sense. If someone actually put together a plan that had realistic numbers assigned to it that showed there was an opportunity to recoup further investment in the XL center, I’d be behind it, but it seems like the management style of the CDRA is pretty much “I don’t know, let’s give this a shot” coupled with a concerted effort to hide as much of their ongoing loss as possible in the University of Connecticut. Athletic department budget.
The XL center became an afterthought as soon as both casinos opened. Now they both have Sports betting on site. I find it amazing that you can't bet on UConn teams in state(full disclosure I don't bet on College sports) yet the UConn Women play at Mohegan Sun. It's the ultimate hypocrisy -It tells me that the state and city of Hartford can't produce a venue to compete with Mohegan Sun.
 
I agree that investing in rebuilding the XL Center is not a good financial investment, but the right building could be used much more. Hartford should be in the rotation for NCAA tournament games, both men and women, as well as NCAA hockey tournament games as well as more concerts. And, Hartford does not really have much activity and it needs draws to get people into the city and help with the turnaround. I do think the city is turning around with UConn moving in, apartments being built, and the Yard Goats stadium.
I don’t know. It seems to me like the days of the big arena may be gone if you don’t have a pro team as an anchor tenant. Concert venues aren’t looking for cavernous space in general and it seems like the casinos are a better venue for a multitude of reasons. I agree for Hartford to have a shot at making its money back. It would need an updated venue rather than throwing another coat of paint on the XL. I’m just not sure that they ever end up with any return on investment from that.

I agree with you 100% that the Yardgoats stadium got it right, well, at least after the initial construction problems. Maybe there’s something to be learned from that. Could Hartford support a major league stadium? Probably not. But a right sized stadium has been successful, though, not the economic engine it was portrayed to be.
 
We block UMass :)
I don’t know that they are particularly worthy of a spot, but if they were, more power to them. Having a decent UMass is good for UConn.
 
.-.
LOL. It's easy for 82. It's not his job that he's betting with..
Lol, way not to tag someone.

True enough, although it’s also true, that it’s not my tax dollars that’s being used to support an organization that has cost state of Connecticut taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. If it was, I would be livid about it.
 
I don’t know that they are particularly worthy of a spot, but if they were, more power to them. Having a decent UMass is good for UConn.
True. There is potential but they have a long way to go to be relevant and there is no commitment by the state, unlike UConn. BC gets little attention even in Boston. It’s a pro state.
 
After it was mentioned Pitt could go to the Big12 it got me thinking. If the Pac12 survives, the Big12 could add Pitt, Syracuse, UConn & BC and have an eastern group of 6 with WV & Cincy. I envision UVA & UNC to the BIG & Fl State & Clemson to the SEC. Perhaps the Big 12 takes some ACC leftovers. One thing for sure-changes are coming at some point. I love the BE & MSG and Hockey East but we need a football home and more revenue. Can’t wait for MSG Thursday
Just asking this question. Would the B1G give UConn a look because of two stellar basketball programs, Jim Mora and his football team, and because of UConn’s support of its Ice Hockey program, the new arena, etc. The B1G also gets it hooks into the NYC metro area and the rest of the Northeast.
 
Lol, way not to tag someone.

True enough, although it’s also true, that it’s not my tax dollars that’s being used to support an organization that has cost state of Connecticut taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. If it was, I would be livid about it.
The State of Connecticut enters into dozens of relationships with businesses which costs state dollars to protect CT jobs and tax base. As does every other state. You disagree with it, that's fine -- you're not alone -- but it's a reasonable and common state action. Is the particular deal a good one? Way beyond my ability to know. Or yours.
 
If Hartford were 4 times the size with 3 times the population its image would be much different to outsiders. It would also actually be much different if it were combined with West Hartford, East Hartford, Whethersfield...Probably even have MLB and NFL teams

Hartford - 120k people, 17.4 square miles
Cincinnati - 309k, 78 sq
St. Louis - 293k, 62 sq
Pittsburgh - 300k, 55 sq
Comparing city sizes is a fools errand. You always need to compare metro population.
 
Comparing city sizes is a fools errand. You always need to compare metro population.
My point was that the city of Hartford given the metro population is too small geographically at 17 square miles. It should include the neighboring towns.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,359
Messages
4,567,643
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom