SubbaBub
Your stupidity is ruining my country.
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 32,564
- Reaction Score
- 26,504
No, my point is we'll get games against P5/P4/P3/P2 conferences (whatever it ends up being); some winnable and some not so much (e.g. upcoming against Clemson). Bottom line is I'd much rather play "up" in competition and play more attractive programs in football. Similar to what the basketball program gets in the BE versus being in the AAC. Better for the fanbase, better for the athletes/competition, etc.So your position is you would rather be someone’s easy W to pad their stats than to play and try to win against teams the fan base cares about beating?
Why would BC and Syracuse choose to leave the ACC? They may occupy the bottom tier of ACC football (hoops too), but the $$$$$ still flow. No way they leave, unless forced out, or the conference disbands with the defections of Clemson, Fla St., Ga Tech, UNC, etc.BC, Syracuse and UConn can create their own football conference by adding Villanova, Temple, Army, Navy and maybe Delaware, Buffalo and Umass.
No thanks - would way rather be Independent than this ^
Agreeing with you - you conflated my position with the OP.Why would BC and Syracuse choose to leave the ACC? They may occupy the bottom tier of ACC football (hoops too), but the $$$$$ still flow. No way they leave, unless forced out, or the conference disbands with the defections of Clemson, Fla St., Ga Tech, UNC, etc.
At this juncture, UConn football being independent gives us the potential of options down the line.

Relying on being a buy game for teams is going to get tougher if leagues keep adding more and more league games to the schedule. If we can be in a conference people care about against universities with some shared history I think it would be a home run. To be able to win games will certainly help all problems.No, my point is we'll get games against P5/P4/P3/P2 conferences (whatever it ends up being); some winnable and some not so much (e.g. upcoming against Clemson). Bottom line is I'd much rather play "up" in competition and play more attractive programs in football. Similar to what the basketball program gets in the BE versus being in the AAC. Better for the fanbase, better for the athletes/competition, etc.
No one knows what will happen but the SEC ADs are interested in going to 11 all conference games with one reserved for outside yearly rival. When you combine this with a championship game and perhaps even a team conference playoff if they reach 20 teams, and then of course a 12 team football playoff, there will be no room for anything else.Disagree - they'll have some because they will all want to pad their schedule for "easy" W's. And, we could do some horse trading: men's and women's bball games for football games.
And, if we're going to play teams on a par with the ones you listed, I'm sure we'd much rather have at least some of them be in FL, TX, and other better recruiting areas.
The whole point of the original post was what happens when the ACC loses 6 teams to the B1G and SECWhy would BC and Syracuse choose to leave the ACC? They may occupy the bottom tier of ACC football (hoops too), but the $$$$$ still flow. No way they leave, unless forced out, or the conference disbands with the defections of Clemson, Fla St., Ga Tech, UNC, etc.
At this juncture, UConn football being independent gives us the potential of options down the line.
11 games?!?No one knows what will happen but the SEC ADs are interested in going to 11 all conference games with one reserved for outside yearly rival. When you combine this with a championship game and perhaps even a team conference playoff if they reach 20 teams, and then of course a 12 team football playoff, there will be no room for anything else.
Agreed - I think the whole idea of the SEC being college's version of the NFL is not going to happen overnight but rather in 10 years plus or minus. Even if there is another super conference, my belief is that there'd be a good 20 or so solid programs spread across the country for us to play games against (2 or 4 game series). Then add in games against geographic rivals, etc. and it all works out better than playing in a conference with the schools listed in the OP.11 games?!?
a team would need to go 5-6 in conference to have a shot at a bowl.
I would be shocked if they went to 11 right now.
I think the 6 win bowl eligibility requirement will go away with the demise/restructuring of the NCAA. Bowls have contracts with conferences and the polls will determine the playoff teams. Teams will go to good bowls with 7-8 wins.The SEC would be short sighted to move to an 11 game conference schedule. First off half the teams would struggle to become bowl eligible as your getting rid of their out of conference games and then your top teams lose some cache going 8-4, 9-3 as opposed to 11-1 or 12-0.
They are already pushing toward 11 because there will be conference playoffs and bigger national playoffs. I read this late last week with SEC ADs discussing it.11 games?!?
a team would need to go 5-6 in conference to have a shot at a bowl.
I would be shocked if they went to 11 right now.
Very interesting idea. Would solidify the Big 10s basketball/other sports presence in the northeast, especially NYC with Seton Hall, St. Johns, and the 6th Borough. However, would state flagships be ok — Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, theOSU, Penn State, Maryland (Gtown), Rutgers — bringing private Catholic school in their respective states into the fold? From a UConn perspective we could stay indy with a scheduling alliance, or say yes to football in the Big 10 if offered.Interesting thread on the St Johns message board
I think it had to do with the old BC/UC bad blood. Before Blooming idiot.I’m not a historian on this matter, but folks in The Athletic comment section seem to believe UConn is blackballed from the ACC because of Blumenthal’s lawsuits
The lawsuit was lead by Syracuse and in fact, the insults were openly lobbed at BC and the ACC primarily from the Pitt President. He got personal.I think it had to do with the old BC/UC bad blood. Before Blooming idiot.
This morning, saw a story that both Clemson, and Fl. St. are trying to move to the SEC. Apparently the SEC has it's sights set on scooping up Notre Dame. My question is, will ND be a full time, i.e all sports, or will they try to continue as an independent football club. News flash ND, it's not the old days anymore.WVA, maybe.................Kansas? I don't think so. Think on this, could you see some ACC teams bolt? I could see Fl St., Miami, Clemson. Forming a 2 or 3, or 4 division conference. Now bear with me. A giant SEC mega-conference.
SEC-1: Clemson, Miami, Florida, Florida ST. South Carolina
SEC-2: Tennessee, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Miss St. Vanderbilt
SEC-3: Alabama, LSU, Arkansas, Missouri, Auburn
SEC-4 Texas, OK. ,Texas A&M, and either/or Baylor, Texas Tech, or OK St.
3 of the divisions have 5 teams, with only 1 with 6. Un-Wielding YES. a possibility? Why not. With the collegiete map the way it is now, anything is possible. The NCAA is no longer the ruling party. It's the mega conferences that are holding sway, and NO, I have not been smoking any weird herbs. Just look at the idea. I mean it makes a lot more sense than that abomination of the American Conference, UCONN spent those years in. It has some rivalry possibilies with the SC/Fl teams, the central area of TN, GA, MS, KY, then AL, AR, MO, LA, and the TX/OK teams.
What say many of you?
Actually, Blumenthal spearheaded the lawsuit and sued a lot of people personally to ratchet up the animosity. But, at this point, it doesn't matter anymore because the SEC just jumped to hyperspace and word is that Clemson and FSU want a piece.The lawsuit was lead by Syracuse and in fact, the insults were openly lobbed at BC and the ACC primarily from the Pitt President. He got personal.
Pittsburgh president at the time, Nordenberg, headed the BE and had many choice things to say about the ACC and their lack of integrity. Nordenberg was not a lawyer but those 3 other schools joined in, and all we heard in the public sphere were insults from the very people that got invited to the ACC later.Actually, Blumenthal spearheaded the lawsuit and sued a lot of people personally to ratchet up the animosity. But, at this point, it doesn't matter anymore because the SEC just jumped to hyperspace and word is that Clemson and FSU want a piece.
Clemson, Florida State Reach Out to SEC About Joining Conference (Report)
The news could be problematic for the ACC and potentially Syracuse.
MIKE MCALLISTERAUG 2, 2021
- Clemson and Florida State have reached out to the SEC to inquire about joining the conference, according to a report from Marc Ryan, Assistant Program Director of ESPN Upstate.
"Per a reliable source, Clemson+Florida State have reached out to the SEC about joining the conference," Ryan tweeted. "The SEC is concerned that streaming numbers for Clemson+Florida State don't bring what Oklahoma+Texas do. Notre Dame is the only 'free agent' left that would 'add to the pot.'"
That’s why the whole “people were butt hurt from the lawsuit” argument doesn’t stand up to any reasonable amount of scrutiny.Pittsburgh president at the time, Nordenberg, headed the BE and had many choice things to say about the ACC and their lack of integrity. Nordenberg was not a lawyer but those 3 other schools joined in, and all we heard in the public sphere were insults from the very people that got invited to the ACC later.
Prove it. Syracuse was not a party to the lawsuit.The lawsuit was lead by Syracuse and in fact, the insults were openly lobbed at BC and the ACC primarily from the Pitt President. He got personal.
I got the school wrong. It was these 5: Pitt, Rutgers, Virginia Tech, Connecticut and West VirginiaProve it. Syracuse was not a party to the lawsuit.
If the NCAA losses the football playoffs that‘s a huge blow toI think the 6 win bowl eligibility requirement will go away with the demise/restructuring of the NCAA. Bowls have contracts with conferences and the polls will determine the playoff teams. Teams will go to good bowls with 7-8 wins.
Interesting thread on the St Johns message board
They have to take our football team.Interesting thread on the St Johns message board
I agree. Such a move HAS to be for ALL sports. UConn can't allow it's football team to dangle in independent limbo if the Big East & B1G affiliate. And the hockey teams would have to move over as well. Otherwise it makes little sense to entertain the idea.They have to take our football team.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, it's an interesting idea, but wouldn't the schools with a high football profile making conference decisions for the basketball schools put us in the same boat which lead to the old BE break-up? Just a thought.It's pretty galaxy brain thinking, but I'll play ball with it. I can only think of three reasons this would make any sense:
FOX owns TV rights to both conferences so it in theory could happen if pushed by them and unlike why the Big East fell originally, the Big East teams would get a fractional share of TV $$ since most schools don't play football.
- Ability to get access to more NCAA tourney credits
- Access to the MSG contract the week of conference tourneys (as opposed to the stunt the Big 10 did a couple years ago playing their tourney a week early then teams waiting a week till Selection Sunday)
- With the SEC monopolizing football, the Big 10 monopolizes basketball with some of the biggest brands Michigan State, UConn, Nova, and maybe that's where Kansas comes into play for only bball and not a full member of the Big 10.
FOX could market that pretty easily and make all parties more money than before to make it worth the while.
No idea how this would work from a scheduling perspective but it's a cool idea.
I believe what broke up the original Big East was money and more specifically that everyone got even shares of the TV pot despite the Catholic 7 not playing football.I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, it's an interesting idea, but wouldn't the schools with a high football profile making conference decisions for the basketball schools put us in the same boat which lead to the old BE break-up? Just a thought.