Randy Edsall is gone people.
Winning a league championship is the goal of every team, every year, in whatever league you play. If you can't set the goal of winning the league, then you've got a major job of program building on your hands when it comes to recruiting.
Edsall managed to do that, he's not an incompetent coach. I don't think there's anyone here that has said he is.
What Edsall did - as the whaler fan pointed out, is head coach a program to several bowl games, and two big east co-titles and a BCS game. What the whaler fan didn't point out, is that he managed to do that, without ever winning more than 8 games in a regular season, and having been ranked in the top 25 in the country for a grand total of 1 week, a week that ended with us getting the kicked out of us at home, by a real to 25 program.
THe buzz around UConn football at that time, a few years ago, was amazing. I look very much forward to the next time, the FIRST time, that two national ranked college football teams play a game at Rentschler field, and then to it becoming a regular thing. We're not that far away from making that happen.
Edsall wasn't getting the program there though, not by a long shot.
Can Pasqualoni? We'll see.
I have no doubt in my mind that Edsall....can....be successful at Maryland, I hope he does. He'll join a long, long line of football coaches that have ties to Connecticut and have had great success, going all the way back to the beginning of American football. The problem he faces, is that he cannot go 6-24 or whatever in his first three years, and go unnoticed, and have complete job security.
He's now full on - into what Pasqualoni called....high performance business. There's no throwing away games, or a season, and Edsall did exactly that in Maryland, threw away a season.
A parent of a player, asked me prior to this season, on this forum, if I thought that the new coaching staff would treat the 2010 season at UConn as a throwaway season as they transition. I said no, that's not how this coach operates, we'll find a way to be competitive, and still put in a new program.
Edsall did a great job at UConn. UConn can be better than what Edsall did at UConn. As for recruiting the Northeast USA for football players? I'm completely dumbfounded by the things I"ve read here about that.
Recruiting the northeast was difficult for Edsall, and he complained about it, because even after the state of the art facilities were built, he couldn't compete with the programs that have been plucking the best players for decades.
It shouldn't be shocking that there are a minimal number of players on southern US state programs from the northeast, and it certainly says nothing about the quality of top football players coming out of the northeast USA.
Dumb, dumb, dumb argument.