- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 27,509
- Reaction Score
- 37,288
You have no idea what you are talking about. But keep going.
And you keep on genuflecting in front of Saint Randy.
You have no idea what you are talking about. But keep going.
And you keep on genuflecting in front of Saint Randy.
He was 74 - 70 in 10 years
no undefeated season
no 10 win season
no championship won outright
went to a BCS by default......
what about that is above average?
No. We just want his "achievements" to be held in the proper perspective.
Edsall didn't really leave the bar that high for Coach P.
The Edsall bashers emphasize key points, zoo couger actually just mentioned the no signature top 25 wins, and it is a fair argument. But you might want to work on this list. No undefeated season? You are upset about that? No championship won outright? Good stuff. UCONN has 2 big east championships, they earned. Sorry, it is not outright. Went to BCS, by default? No, they went to the BCS because they were the Big East rep.
Focus on the legitimate points criticizing Edsall. Because most of those are not.
Maybe I overstated my point. He did a fine job, not necessarily better than another highly competent - not outstanding - coach could have done with the same material. I consider PP to be a highly competent - not outstanding - coach. He's not Brian Kelly (although many at ND are questioning BK's competence), he's not Frank Beamer, he's not Bear Bryant. What RE brought is respectability, wins, program advancement, and success. Plus he was the first coach of the 1A era. It could have gone very badly if not managed properly. I feel, because he was the one to do it, that he deserves some honor and respect from this program. He wasn't the only one who could have done it, but he did a good job here, no doubt about that.If you look at the post I replied to: "He did a fine job. Not a better job than PP, or anyone else, would have done, imho" you will see that I replied to the very definition of average - doing what anyone else would have done. And that deserves a plaque for that, according to that post.
Every point I listed is legitimate and if you can't recognize that then you have mid-level, average program blinders on and willing to accept an 8 - 5 season going to a low tier bowl game.
No undefeated season? Hell yeah, why not? the Big East has been absolutely dismal the past 3 years and to not think that we couldn't have run the table on some of our schedules is just wrong, especially in 2010 when we pretty much returned our entire team back
No championship outright? yeah that is a big one, especially being in the Big East, when you have 3 teams tie for the conference and the only reason you won is because you beat this team, but they lost to this team, but the other team had 30 points in this game and well they wore blue on sunday and their eyes are green so their better than this team....yeah it is EXTREMELY disappointing.....
and that leads into my BCS by default....do I think we didn't earn it? of course not.....does it mean less than if we beat every Big East team and didn't have to have other people lose to get it.......yes I think it does
take the blinders off
Every point I listed is legitimate and if you can't recognize that then you have mid-level, average program blinders on and willing to accept an 8 - 5 season going to a low tier bowl game.
No undefeated season? Hell yeah, why not? the Big East has been absolutely dismal the past 3 years and to not think that we couldn't have run the table on some of our schedules is just wrong, especially in 2010 when we pretty much returned our entire team back
No championship outright? yeah that is a big one, especially being in the Big East, when you have 3 teams tie for the conference and the only reason you won is because you beat this team, but they lost to this team, but the other team had 30 points in this game and well they wore blue on sunday and their eyes are green so their better than this team....yeah it is EXTREMELY disappointing.....
and that leads into my BCS by default....do I think we didn't earn it? of course not.....does it mean less than if we beat every Big East team and didn't have to have other people lose to get it.......yes I think it does
take the blinders off
Out of curiosity, when was the last time WVU won a Big East Championship outright? I'll give you a clue -- they've won two BCS bowls as co-champ. When was the last time Pitt won an outright title? Syracuse? Rutgers?
Yes, it's easy to do because you pound your chest and say so. And that works for you in your video games.
I think it is a powerful statement that when UConn won the Big East tri-championship and went to the Fiesta Bowl, both of the other tri-champions fired their coach.
You bet it is. If you apply any common sense whatsoever to the situation, it was a statement by WVU and Pitt that it is unacceptable that a team that is basically an expansion team, with no history, with the second smallest stadium, off campus to boot, in the conference, in a less than fertile recruiting territory, can compete with us on an equal basis.
They fired their coaches because it was unbelievable and untenable to them that Randy Edsall had UConn able to compete with their schools as equals. That is why Stew and Wanny got fired. That is why there is no debate nationally whether Esdall achieved more than he should have been expected to at UConn. And that is why the only belief that Edsall accomplished no more, or less, than should have been expected comes from about a score of people on this board.
I'm focusing on the Giants. Have a nice day.
Bizlaw has the right take on it. And yes, that should settle it.
Please show me where I was hatin on Coach P. Just cause you say it doesn't make it true.
"By the way...did you hear...Coach P held a recruiting weekend this weekend but wasn't there to greet them. These are the kind of things I read on the board that make me shake my head." That's what I was referring to.
2 Big East Championships. I am sure some don't consider that a high bar, and on it's face it might not be. But Coach Edsall took this team from it's beginnings as a D 1 program, and I think he did a very good job. Was he Nick Saban? Nope. Did he have flaws? Yep. But he did a ton for this program. Some choose to be bitter, others don't.
Bizlaw has the right take on it. And yes, that should settle it.