EricLA
Cronus
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 15,547
- Reaction Score
- 88,981
Can't really argue with you with regards to perception. I tend to agree you are correct - that Charles is not viewed in the same echelon as the other greats you mentioned. It's been a sort of pet peeve of mine that Tina is frequently overlooked.I completely agree with you that Charles is a fantastic player, one of best in world. If she had been left off the team, everyone would be very surprised. But it wouldn't have been the same type of shock as with Parker's exclusion. Part of it's publicity, but part of it is also that Parker is generally considered in a (slightly) different class than Charles--with Maya, Taurasi, and (maybe) EDD.
I do agree with UCMiami though that Charles inclusion is important because she does provide the versatility to guard the 5, whereas Parker's frame makes that a more difficult assignment for her.
I do get that the players who are considered the best in the world never seem to include Tina. She doesn't do the "wow" things that some of the others do, but she's a world class player. Like I said I do get your point. I thought you were saying that Parker should have been on the team and Charles cut. That was where my 100% disagreement came from...