Carnac
That venerable sage from the west
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Messages
- 15,930
- Reaction Score
- 78,998
I nominate this post for POD.....Post of the Day. This guy hit the nail on the head. 100 likes for this post.

That's the best one I've seen. It leaves out the super tiny name schools. I'd be interested for football, but basketball wouldn't be so hot. Also, Navy should probably be in there for viewership reasons.
It's ok except that we are in it. Gross.That's the best one I've seen. It leaves out the super tiny name schools. I'd be interested for football, but basketball wouldn't be so hot. Also, Navy should probably be in there for viewership reasons.
I agree, but it is a pretty solid football lineup. Take a look at our home football schedules for 24' and 25'. Not pretty.It's ok except that we are in it. Gross.
Terrible for other sports and the nothing would kill those programs faster. It isn't billed as "football only". That would be ok.I agree, but it is a pretty solid football lineup. Take a look at our home football schedules for 24' and 25'. Not pretty.
It was the textbook example of not being able to read the market.I cannot believe ESPN offered 30 million and they sent Kliavkoff out to ask for 50 million. That is the epitome of brutality or at least self sabotage.
In all honesty, it was just flat out boneheaded and stupid.It was the textbook example of not being able to read the market.
Basketball wouldn't be so hot? It would be an epic disaster.That's the best one I've seen. It leaves out the super tiny name schools. I'd be interested for football, but basketball wouldn't be so hot. Also, Navy should probably be in there for viewership reasons.
It was the textbook example of not being able to read the market.
How so? We have PAC people saying they turned down 30 million from ESPN and asked for 50 instead. The WSU AD stated the conference was grossly mismanaged for a decade. The ESPN offer ended up being higher than the Apple offer, though if i was them i would have taken the Apple offer since it gave them an out after 2 years if they weren't making as much as the Big12 with subs. Much like the BE FB conference in its final days you had people within the conference working behind the scenes to bring about the conference's demise. In this case it was OU/UW whose end goal was always the B1G.It seems more like a textbook example of ESPN misinformation.
![]()
Inside the Pac-12 collapse: Four surprising moments that crushed the conference
How did the Pac-12 die? These surprising decisions by USC, Oregon, Washington and others thwarted efforts to save the conference.www.latimes.com
As in, worse than the American at its start. A steaming pile.Basketball wouldn't be so hot? It would be an epic disaster.
There is a lot in that article. Women's hoop and UConn mentioned. ESPN's Burke Magnus on TV rights plans, SEC over Big Ten, Jeff Van Gundy and more
I've said from the beginning this was an inside job. Really sent Kliavkoff back to ask for 50 million? Pffft. Buying time till the implosion came.Some of the people in this thread are reading this right, but not all. At USC, UCLA, Oregon and Washington, the schools were never going to accept ESPN's offer.
So to say this is just dunderheaded presidents is a convenient excuse for them.
If anything, Oregon and Washington were hoping the Pac12 dissolved into the B12. They knew for a very long time they were getting out, but they didn't want to be the ones to kill it.
When the meeting happened, the chips were finally on the table.
There is no alternate universe where USC, UCLA, Oregon and Washington had more realistic presidents who knew college sports and therefore read the marketplace correctly, and accepted ESPN's offer.
We're all here discussing FSU squeezing ACC members into giving it bigger shares. It was the same dynamic in the B12 and the Pac12. The big schools simply wanted a lot more.