- Joined
- Dec 28, 2013
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction Score
- 218
It made someone some money.
Marchisio was very reckless here - clearly goes way over the ball and drives his studs into the guy's leg just below the knee (and this gif closely approximate's the referee's angle). I'd have gone yellow, but there's a fair amount of soccer commentary on line (and the ESPN announcers) that agreed with the red. Over the ball with studs up is considered an attempt to injure (as is biting of course).
The ball was poked by the Uruguayan player, which made it look worse and that extra little ummph he put in it to get leverage probably was the difference between yellow and red.
http://gfycat.com/WickedCreamyCero
I am surprised that the other team and the fans can even fit in the stadium considering the size of Suarez’s ego.
In a back alley, who would win in a fight, Suarez or Balotelli?
Think that was part of it. Blatant over the ball challenge following a lot of chippyness. Ref needed to make a statement to get control of the game.
Still didn't work, obviously.
WTF. Why would you do that? I don't get it. Punch the guy in the balls when no one is looking; elbows are innocuous; a Kick ... that seems like part of the play. I just don't understand this.
It made someone some money.
We were at a restaurant, and we all commented that if we were Chiellini, we would have violently face shoved the Uruguayan who came over to pull up our shirt. Chiellini should have took matters into his own hands there.
I noted this on the other board; but, I would have called it a Yellow. It looked to me like Marchisio was trying to physically box out Rios from the ball by putting two legs done on each side of the ball and then spinning around to use his back to shield. I have done that myself a few times. Unfortunately, Marchisio horribly mistimed his second step and planted it on Rios’s leg instead of the turf. Bad play yes; but, not reckless or with intent to injure.
I have honestly never seen anything like Suarez. I have no idea what will happen probably a ban but i'm sure 5 years from now we'll find out he was either doing a lot of drugs or has some sort of mental illness.
I noted this on the other board; but, I would have called it a Yellow. It looked to me like Marchisio was trying to physically box out Rios from the ball by putting two legs done on each side of the ball and then spinning around to use his back to shield. I have done that myself a few times. Unfortunately, Marchisio horribly mistimed his second step and planted it on Rios’s leg instead of the turf. Bad play yes; but, not reckless or with intent to injure.
We were at a restaurant, and we all commented that if we were Chiellini, we would have violently face shoved the Uruguayan who came over to pull up our shirt. Chiellini should have took matters into his own hands there.
bobbygt said:I don't see the intent to injure there, but you just can't make that type of contact (his studs are nowhere near the ball) right in front of the ref. The offense by itself is probably a yellow, but I've seen reds shown for lesser fouls.