We are talking you, superjohn, Huskybass, JMick and who else..?
Not a good comparison. Pikiell's in his 13th year as a D1 head coach, is approaching 250 career wins, and if he gets Rutgers to 20 wins this year he'll have gone for 20+ in 6 of his last 7 seasons and 7 of his last 9 despite heading one program (Stony Brook) that literally didn't exist and another (Rutgers) that has one 20+ win season in the last 35 years.How many here remember Mitch Buonaguro? Assistant at BC for two years and then eight years as an assistant to Rollie Massimino at Villanova. He was highly thought of and became head coach at Fairfield in 1985, had a great first year (24-7) and many UConn fans wished he'd been hired that year to replace Dom Perno. Buonaguro never had a winning season again and was fired after five straight losing seasons.
Not a good comparison. Pikiell's in his 13th year as a D1 head coach, is approaching 250 career wins, and if he gets Rutgers to 20 wins this year he'll have gone for 20+ in 6 of his last 7 seasons and 7 of his last 9 despite heading one program (Stony Brook) that literally didn't exist and another (Rutgers) that has one 20+ win season in the last 35 years.
There are questions as to whether he can recruit and retain enough top-level talent to get a team to the top of a P5 conference, and so far he's only proved to be an OK, not great, tournament coach.
There's no question, however, as to whether he can be a consistent, winning head coach at a sub-P5 level.
Buonaguro is a bad comp for Pikiell. He's probably a better comp for Ollie, tbh.
Yeah, definitely not saying he'll be that. But maybe he could be Tony Bennett-ish?Oh, oh, I didn't mean to compare Pikiell to Buonaguro as to quality, only that he's done a good job with Rutgers last year and this year but shouldn't assume that means he'll get better every year and become Rutgers' Jim Calhoun.
This is GOLD. BravoGuys, this win doesn't count for Pikiell. Many of his players were developed and recruited under the previous head coach.
Looking forward to seeing how they handle their January schedule. If they run the table at home they'll head into the last month of the season at 16-8 and maybe on the NCAA tourney bubble. Run the table at home + steal road wins at Penn State and/or Illinois (very possible), and they'd probably be considered a tourney team.
Pikiell's already proved he can build a small program from scratch. If he can resurrect a P5 program from the dead, the dude will become a hot commodity.
And it needs to be said: Rutgers aren't doing this because they have one lights-out shooter or something. They're just really, really well coached – defend well, rebound well, don't turn it over much, hit their rotations, etc.
It's nice to see.
Perhaps. We'll definitely know more at the end of January. The low bar is beating Wisconsin, Iowa and Nebraska at home, at the very least. Add in Ohio State and one road win, and this thing'll have legs.
Doesn’t matter. If ko is “ struggling “ with getting top talent to the aac as well as Larry brown did and tubby and ( both national champs) mick and even mr Williams, Stevie p ain’t got a chance. Bottom line ( and it has taken 3 years for me to get here), we could recruit better at the bottom of the acc or nbe, than in the middle or top of the aac. Let’s hope WSU kills it this year and gets us to add another good program ( Dayton. Vcu?) maybe we can be another nbe type conference. Our issue is the bottom of this league is killing us. ironically , if we and say smu struggled for a few years and any other cellar dwellers emerged, this conference would be legit.Not a good comparison. Pikiell's in his 13th year as a D1 head coach, is approaching 250 career wins, and if he gets Rutgers to 20 wins this year he'll have gone for 20+ in 6 of his last 7 seasons and 7 of his last 9 despite heading one program (Stony Brook) that literally didn't exist and another (Rutgers) that has one 20+ win season in the last 35 years.
There are questions as to whether he can recruit and retain enough top-level talent to get a team to the top of a P5 conference, and so far he's only proved to be an OK, not great, tournament coach.
There's no question, however, as to whether he can be a consistent, winning head coach at a sub-P5 level.
Buonaguro is a bad comp for Pikiell. He's probably a better comp for Ollie, tbh.
This makes zero sense.Doesn’t matter. If ko is “ struggling “ with getting top talent to the aac as well as Larry brown did and tubby and ( both national champs) and mick and even mr Williams, Stevie p ain’t got a chance. Bottom line ( and it has taken 3 years for me to get here), we could recruit better at the bottom of the acc or nbe, than in the middle of top of the aac.
Don’t you mean 4 years ago? If your measurement is consistent, that was the 2014 season, and we’re in the 2018 season. And, I don’t think anyone here hates KO. We want to be competitive and somewhat relevant. If we fail to make the tournament again this year, it makes literally 1 appearance in four years, and that’s unacceptable, and why attendance is reaching a record low. It’s just not sustainable. Obviously, we’re all praying KO gets the program back to some relevancy, but there are few to no signs of improvement. This is just a fact. But I wish people would please stop saying that because the fanbase is dissatisfied with Kevin Ollie’s performance that equates to hatred for him. Our allegiance is to a team, not a coach, and when your beloved team fails year after year after year after year, you can’t keep doing the same thing expecting different results. He deserves the end of the season, and everybody is rooting for us to win, but just because were rooting and wanting to win doesn’t mean people aren’t fans when expressing realistic expectations that we will probably not win. That said, there’s always a chance of a little Husky magic late in season and it at least gives us a sliver of hope, which even the most dissatisfied of us will cling to.
Coaching matters.
Like I said, we'll know more at the end of January. But their three losses all came against ranked teams (FSU, Minnesota & Sparty), and they played two of those – FSU & Sparty – hella tough. Sparty in particular struggled a lot more with Rutgers than they did with UConn.I mean RU was 11-1 last year and ended up 15-18. They're 10-3 now, not as good as last year and Hall handed them one yesterday.
I'm sure that AD Dave is monitoring the situation and the next 2 games against Arizona and Auburn will tell him everything he needs to know about Ollie and the program moving forward.
If we lose both by 30+, they'll tell him quite a bit.Yeah, the results of two games will tell him everything he needs to know about the future of UCONN basketball. You are a true simpleton.
This is GOLD. Bravo
Pikiell is a good coach there is no denying that, and he is doing it at places that are hard to win at. Pikiell knows how to coach, motivate, and has an identity that he wants his to play with. I'm sure that AD Dave is monitoring the situation and the next 2 games against Arizona and Auburn will tell him everything he needs to know about Ollie and the program moving forward.
PS: Corey Sanders is a good college player equal to Jalen in many respects. He was a top 60 player out of high school.
PS: With the way Rutgers is playing and already getting Montez for next year,if Pikieel gets them to middle of the pack in the Big 10, recruiting may be on the upswing as well, as New Brunswick, NJ is an easy place to recruit to with NYC literally next door.