intlzncster
i fart in your general direction
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 28,931
- Reaction Score
- 60,234
it'd be crazy if it came out that the NCAA was complicit.Beeeeuuuuuutiful
Sean Miller...
‘You can make millions off of one kid’: Details of the college basketball corruption case
"Dawkins called Richardson two days later and said the undercover agent — posing as the financial backer — was willing to provide the extra $15,000 if Richardson would treat it as a payment for the following three months. Richardson agreed, according to the documents.Dawkins spoke to the undercover agent that same day and said that, “(The head coach at Arizona) is talking out of his mouth, he wants (Player-5) bad as (expletive). So, I mean, the leverage I have with that program would be ridiculous at that point"
Cmon guys, it's obvious someone from Auburn called the hotline
the other scenario is that it's so rampant the NCAA does nothing.How many schools do you think will eventually suffer some pain from this? They won't all be in trouble with the FBI, but when they start questioning these players, how long will it be before they talk? This is where lesser schools that aren't involved with Adidas, or Nike money are going to get burned.
The FBI asks the player if anyone else on their AAU team got money. The kid says yes, and names 2 other kids who got big bucks. The FBI asks, "is that all"? The kid then tells them that some of the lesser players got paid to sign with their mid major, and low major schools. It was smaller payments, maybe $5,000, or 10,000, and it came from boosters. This is absolutely going to happen, and these schools are going to be in trouble, maybe not with the FBI, but definitely with the NCAA, which will be out to get some scalps after letting this go on right under their noses.
So, umass is in trouble then, right?How many schools do you think will eventually suffer some pain from this? They won't all be in trouble with the FBI, but when they start questioning these players, how long will it be before they talk? This is where lesser schools that aren't involved with Adidas, or Nike money are going to get burned.
The FBI asks the player if anyone else on their AAU team got money. The kid says yes, and names 2 other kids who got big bucks. The FBI asks, "is that all"? The kid then tells them that some of the lesser players got paid to sign with their mid major, and low major schools. It was smaller payments, maybe $5,000, or 10,000, and it came from boosters. This is absolutely going to happen, and these schools are going to be in trouble, maybe not with the FBI, but definitely with the NCAA, which will be out to get some scalps after letting this go on right under their noses.
He's worried about Duquesne.So, umass is in trouble then, right?
You mean the assistant who was coordinating the payments? He's a good guy? ...and was just doing his job? So an accomplice to a crime is a good guy and should just be let go? Glad Seth isn't running the FBI.
He's worried about Duquesne.
I'm pretty confident you understood it was a joke, but I threw you a like anyway.Duquesne and UMass would have to be the most inept cheaters ever. No way the shoe companies would pay their players, but every school has boosters that will pay, even at the AE, and NEC level.
Of course!! That said, there have been some inept cheaters through the years. USF comes to mind.I'm pretty confident you understood it was a joke, but I threw you a like anyway.
Uh, thanks for the pro tip?You realize that while bleach destroys DNA evidence, it also oxidizes metals quickly and in aggressive manner. In other words - you be caught through circumstantial evidence. (Why was this wood chipper bleached?) Just run some other small mammals through it and the contamination from numerous mammalian sources will be enough to confound any forensics lab. (Well there were indications of non plant DNA, but for all we know, a rat's nest was in a log and said animals were macerated during operation.)
what year did this investigation start?
I am not a tax lawyer, but if the NCAA chooses to do nothing, would that affect their tax status? I would think its hard claim not for profit when amateurs are getting paid piles of cash under the table.the other scenario is that it's so rampant the NCAA does nothing.
Funny but you guys didn't give Calhoun the same benefit. He got, by far, the fewest bluechip recruits of any coach with his level of credentials. I think he got fewer than one burger kid every three years. Yet, you guys called him a cheater.Duquesne and UMass would have to be the most inept cheaters ever. No way the shoe companies would pay their players, but every school has boosters that will pay, even at the AE, and NEC level.
it'd be crazy if it came out that the NCAA was complicit.