I’m not defending UNC but this was not on the same plane as Bribing players in a systematic way. As to Roy’s comment he was essentially just repeating UNCs argument to the NCAA. My guess is this will mainly be a “paper penalty” where past victories are cancelled. Maybe a tourney ban this year and a couple of lost scholarships next. To me vacating wins is no penalty at all. They happened. The team won. Going back 10 years and saying it didn’t is silly.
One could easily argue this is worse, for any number of reasons.
Given what this is, a marriage between academics and athletics, we can all be cynical and say, many of the athletes are not in it for education (oddly, I can make the same argument for some regular students!). We can also say that universities should look the other way when players get paid because this is a business.
But when you look at this whole thing from the fundamental value of fairness, the UNC story is awful. And worse than paying players. Athletes are systematically deprived of an education, if they want it. It is unfair to regular students as well. It is unfair to college basketball teams that are not doing this. It makes a mockery of the NCAA's PR campaign with APR.
And that last one is really the major sticking point here.
Is the NCAA prepared to jettison their much loved (but totally phony) PR campaign? Because if they don't come down hard on UNC, we should never ever listen to the NCAA pontificate about athletes and academics ever again.
I am not for paying players (mainly because I know from the inside how university finances work). But in the scheme of things, I do think there are worse violations than paying players.
UNC lost its soul.