Yeah but, half of them are twice a year Christians, 20% don't go to church at all, and half of what's left are going to church only because they don't want to take any chances with Hell and what not.
Point is, 78% of people answering "Christian" to a random poll does not equate to "being religious," as I mean it.
Perhaps we just have different defs. I don't define "religious" as "anybody who is not atheist."
Your point may be true, but it does seem a little convenient to discount a ton a people. I don't want to get into a big thing (
a la the Catholic argument I saw earlier--we can agree to disagree if it's going to get as angry as that seemed to).
Regardless. Even if I were to concede this, I think a few things going on:
- I think you are conflating a small, east and west coast, intellectuals with the country at large.
- I think there is something "American" about "leave me the hell alone about your beliefs and let me do what I want." This is why the pilgrims came. "Let me make money" is why Jamestown was founded. Good or bad (and let's not get into it) these are the people, and those are, in some ways, the ethics, of our country. I don't think "leave me alone about your religion" is "anti-religious."
- Any country that generally needs you to have a religion to hold office (not legally, but atheism is looked down on intensely according to polls), and 100% of the time for the presidency that religion needs to be Christian, can't really be "anti-religious."
To be clear, I take "anti-religious" to mean not liking religion. I think you can not go to church, but not be "anti-religious" in the same way I don't eat Fluff all that much, but still wouldn't put myself in the anti-Fluff camp. (I'm cool if you eat it. I might once in a while.)
I think Americans are cool with religion. They just want to be left to their own and not evangelized to. And again, church membership, church attendance, and any other measure of religiosity is much higher in the US than Canada, Japan, Korea, or first world Europe.