One writer's thoughts on Caroline Ducharme

[GEAinAustin]

cferraro04, thank you, that has been what I have been stating all along . This team has mix and match combination depth, depending on the situation and opponent . 1st world problems !

 

[TCC Kid]

I saw Ice and Ayanna play in games with the top players in the country.....I was not impressed. They have a long way to go before they can start at UCON

As I said, I haven't seen them in USA/International BB. My opinion is that that venue tends to speak mountains about their ability in Div One. I'll wait and see how they play in Nov. It is always my hope that the new kids, every year,perform as Caroline and Azzi did this past year. Some have, some havent.

 

[TCC Kid]

Boy do we have problems this year...DeBerry might take time away from Dorka,,,Ice Brady might take time away from DeBerry; Ayanna Patterson might take time away from Caroline Ducharme and Aubrey Griffin might take time away from Ayanna Patterson but wait, Aaliyah Edwards might have a break-out year and just be the Huskies most valuable player; Fudd might take over for Muhl...no wait, Muhl according to the UConn staff will have an extended role in this year's version of the Huskies so, Fudd will have to settle for "back-up guard and when she isn't doing that she could spend her time leading the Huskies in scoring knocking down 7-8 three pointers; Lou Senechal might take time from both Fudd and Muhl and then there is Ines Bettencourt...oh my...what is a coach to do? If these are our problems...I take them...all day long.

HHoly Mackerel, this is going to be a GREAT yeat. 10 or so players for every game. Edwards, I knew would have a break out Junior or Sr year. This beat the heck out of no bench at all. WOW..

 

[hoophuskee]

Interesting. I didn’t see that game. If I had to guess, I’d have said she’s a good defensive match for Caroline simply because she’s strong and neither one is super quick. Caroline relies on strength and footwork to muscle past smaller guards, which won’t work as well against Ayanna. But I suspect she’s not going to be able to guard quicker wings as effectively, and probably not against quicker shooting guards.

I think you are short-changing Caroline's quickness too. Caroline also relies on quickness imo. You can be quick without the basketball. But you're right -- to defend a super quick guard one-on-one they aren't that well. But how many 3's are super quick that are both a great shooter, great passer, and great finisher on a very good / formidable team? To further that, the opposing team is scouted in advance and you can play defense to force them toward help.

They don't have to be "super-quick." Just be quick enough.

 

[Zarathustra]

Interesting. I didn’t see that game. If I had to guess, I’d have said she’s a good defensive match for Caroline simply because she’s strong and neither one is super quick. Caroline relies on strength and footwork to muscle past smaller guards, which won’t work as well against Ayanna. But I suspect she’s not going to be able to guard quicker wings as effectively, and probably not against quicker shooting guards.

By contrast, Aubrey at her best two years ago could defend shooting guards effectively. For example, she was able to cover Caitlin Clark and Dijonnai Carrington. She even was able to cover Zia Cooke effectively. This was only for brief stretches, to be sure, and Aubrey is not as big as Ayanna. But she was quite a bit quicker and this matters against players like this.

I think the ceiling is very high for Ayanna for the reasons you cite, even if I don’t think she’s going to be quite as versatile on D as you seem to. For one thing, I suspect she’ll have better offensive skills than Aubrey.

Thinking strategically, however, I picture Ayanna as a serious defensive contributor against SC, where she should be able to shut down Saxton. One of the elements of SC’s attack is a quick front line in Boston and Saxton. I don’t imagine we’ll be able to outplay Boston. But they depend on Saxton, a strong 4 who thrives on rebounding and putbacks. If Ayanna takes that away, I suspect Boston won’t be able to defeat us even if she has a great game. Ayanna is bigger, stronger and quicker than Saxton, and they don’t typically face teams with that much strength and speed on the front line. If Ayanna can shut down Saxton come tournament time, she’ll have done more than enough to earn her spot in the lineup.

If Ayanna can spell Caroline and Lou at the 3 occasionally, I think that will be useful. But I don’t think it’s a lineup we’ll want for long stretches of a game. That would be like putting Aaliyah at the 3. We’ve done that when we had to — watch the UCLA game to see an example — and it came with severe costs against a quick team.

I saw part of that game of Yanna covering Caroline D. Yanna blocked one of Caroline's driving layups.
I did not think, even at the time, have the impression that Yanna " shut her down". Wasn't that an exhibition game or some " made for TV/ all star" contest? Well, regardless, I'm glad both are now on
the same team! Go Huskies, GO Yanna, GO Caroline.

 

[TCC Kid]

I saw part of that game of Yanna covering Caroline D. Yanna blocked one of Caroline's driving layups.
I did not think, even at the time, have the impression that Yanna " shut her down". Wasn't that an exhibition game or some " made for TV/ all star" contest? Well, regardless, I'm glad both are now on
the same team! Go Huskies, GO Yanna, GO Caroline.

Thanks. If Ayanna can swat 1/2 those driving to the basket shots, big big plus. Uconn needs a "back stop" If Ayanna can make drivers think about driving she has don't half the job. Me too I'm happy BOTH are Uconn Huskies.

 

[Notyetready]

She can definitely be a wing defensively just as Aubrey had also been a wing many times defensively. And the other following players I believe have better outside shooting than her who can possibly / or do play at least some offensively on the perimeter which are: Caroline, Lou, Dorka, Edwards, Brady, and Amari. UCONN doesn't build it's offense around offensive rebounding, so as Geno has said many times "What is it that you're good at?" One thing we saw in the 3 on 3 from Patterson is her freak athleticism and rebounding. Like Aubrey she can be a freak rebounder early in her career and that is best suited for the 4/5 spots.

So unless it's a blowout and Geno is just tinkering, Patterson will probably play the 4/5 spots offensively barring any catastrophes.

She effectively guarded Ashlyn Shade in their high school matchup.

 

[MooseJaw]

IMO you need to look at the strengths they bring and not worry who starts and get caught up in all of that. And most importantly what have we heard Geno say many, many times? "Do what you're good at."

For example just looking at Ayanna for discussion; did you know in Ayanna's junior year she was guarding the sr Caroline and basically shut her down in a summer league game? You think Caroline is a starter, right? Yet the summer before Ayanna shut her down. It's because she is a freak athlete with good size. Don't you agree she will be in the 99% percentile in WCBB athleticism and that she is very strong and has decent 6'2 size? That defense is and always has been welcome at UCONN.

So not only defense, but she is probably going to be able to offensive rebound, right? And because she is bigger/stronger and to a certain extent more athletic inside than Aubrey Griffin, she'll probably be able to finish inside better too, right? And any player around her size 5'10 to 6'4, she'll probably be able to defend in an excellent manner, right? These things aren't highlighted during these all-star games.

And add to that, did you know she is a good ball-handler? How can she highlight that in the all-star games when the guards want to showcase their talents while she is stuck inside?

UCONN doesn't play one-on-one. She is a tremendous fit for the 4 position. Some think she is more of a 3, I don't agree. The only way she sees significant time at the 3, excluding blowouts, is if Lou just can't cut it. So in summery, early in her career she'll be more athletic than 99% of the competition thus able to defend near any player near her size while also have enough explosive combination of athleticism and strength be able to rebound both offense and defense while also progressing by scoring inside then as her career progresses hit outside shots more effectively. All-the-while she is a good ball handler with quickness for her size in which each year (not much her 1st year) will become apparent.

Right? I like your post on face value, I don't understand all the "right" stuff.

 

[Alydar]

Interesting. I didn’t see that game. If I had to guess, I’d have said she’s a good defensive match for Caroline simply because she’s strong and neither one is super quick. Caroline relies on strength and footwork to muscle past smaller guards, which won’t work as well against Ayanna. But I suspect she’s not going to be able to guard quicker wings as effectively, and probably not against quicker shooting guards.

By contrast, Aubrey at her best two years ago could defend shooting guards effectively. For example, she was able to cover Caitlin Clark and Dijonnai Carrington. She even was able to cover Zia Cooke effectively. This was only for brief stretches, to be sure, and Aubrey is not as big as Ayanna. But she was quite a bit quicker and this matters against players like this.

I think the ceiling is very high for Ayanna for the reasons you cite, even if I don’t think she’s going to be quite as versatile on D as you seem to. For one thing, I suspect she’ll have better offensive skills than Aubrey.

Thinking strategically, however, I picture Ayanna as a serious defensive contributor against SC, where she should be able to shut down Saxton. One of the elements of SC’s attack is a quick front line in Boston and Saxton. I don’t imagine we’ll be able to outplay Boston. But they depend on Saxton, a strong 4 who thrives on rebounding and putbacks. If Ayanna takes that away, I suspect Boston won’t be able to defeat us even if she has a great game. Ayanna is bigger, stronger and quicker than Saxton, and they don’t typically face teams with that much strength and speed on the front line. If Ayanna can shut down Saxton come tournament time, she’ll have done more than enough to earn her spot in the lineup.

If Ayanna can spell Caroline and Lou at the 3 occasionally, I think that will be useful. But I don’t think it’s a lineup we’ll want for long stretches of a game. That would be like putting Aaliyah at the 3. We’ve done that when we had to — watch the UCLA game to see an example — and it came with severe costs against a quick team.

Great post. From what I saw of Patterson I think you are underestimating her quickness. The only thing she is lacking is a resume. Time should solve that.

 

[MooseJaw]

Interesting. I didn’t see that game. If I had to guess, I’d have said she’s a good defensive match for Caroline simply because she’s strong and neither one is super quick. Caroline relies on strength and footwork to muscle past smaller guards, which won’t work as well against Ayanna. But I suspect she’s not going to be able to guard quicker wings as effectively, and probably not against quicker shooting guards.

By contrast, Aubrey at her best two years ago could defend shooting guards effectively. For example, she was able to cover Caitlin Clark and Dijonnai Carrington. She even was able to cover Zia Cooke effectively. This was only for brief stretches, to be sure, and Aubrey is not as big as Ayanna. But she was quite a bit quicker and this matters against players like this.

I think the ceiling is very high for Ayanna for the reasons you cite, even if I don’t think she’s going to be quite as versatile on D as you seem to. For one thing, I suspect she’ll have better offensive skills than Aubrey.

Thinking strategically, however, I picture Ayanna as a serious defensive contributor against SC, where she should be able to shut down Saxton. One of the elements of SC’s attack is a quick front line in Boston and Saxton. I don’t imagine we’ll be able to outplay Boston. But they depend on Saxton, a strong 4 who thrives on rebounding and putbacks. If Ayanna takes that away, I suspect Boston won’t be able to defeat us even if she has a great game. Ayanna is bigger, stronger and quicker than Saxton, and they don’t typically face teams with that much strength and speed on the front line. If Ayanna can shut down Saxton come tournament time, she’ll have done more than enough to earn her spot in the lineup.

If Ayanna can spell Caroline and Lou at the 3 occasionally, I think that will be useful. But I don’t think it’s a lineup we’ll want for long stretches of a game. That would be like putting Aaliyah at the 3. We’ve done that when we had to — watch the UCLA game to see an example — and it came with severe costs against a quick team.

I disagree on Ayanna's quickness. Watching the all-star games I saw Ayanna often switch off on guards while she more than held her own. She was like watching an Octopuses arms going everywhere. I think we are in for a big surprise with her footwork, she is not a plodder, more like a frisky filly. Let's not ignore the fact that most freshman have a learning curve. We will have to wait to see how steep Her's and the rest of our newbies will be. Pls forgive the analogies to the animal kingdom, I got carried away.

 

[JoePgh]

Pls forgive the analogies to the animal kingdom, I got carried away.

No problem -- that happens to people who have a Moose's Jaw.

 

[Bone Dog]

She effectively guarded Ashlyn Shade in their high school matchup.

I've seen two of their games. In the first one, Ayanna managed to keep Ashlynn under control. But in the second one, when Ashlynn was a junior, she wasn't really able to. Ashlynn led a rout.

To everyone else who's responded, I don't mean to say Caroline is too slow, or Ayanna either. I like their speed just fine. And I'm endlessly impressed with Caroline's moves in the lane and her footwork. She's plenty fast enough for the role she's carved out for herself. But I wouldn't ask either one to guard a speedy shooting guard without help. Often, "help" can solve the problem, but sometimes a speedy guard just can't be contained. KML was often put in situations where she just wasn't quick enough to guard some players for lack of foot speed. But she was too good a shooter to take out.

We can dream of a lineup with Azzi Caroline Ayanna Aaliyah Dorka -- it looks pretty awesome for some occasions. But it will be a slow lineup overall (watch the UCLA game to see what the looks like). If having Ayanna play the 3 solves a particular problem, I'm all for it. I'm not sure I can imagine a situation where it would help to have her playing the 2. Her natural position looks to me to be the 4. I don't want to spend all that athleticism on the perimeter.

 

[Alydar]

I disagree on Ayanna's quickness. Watching the all-star games I saw Ayanna often switch off on guards while she more than held her own. She was like watching an Octopuses arms going everywhere. I think we are in for a big surprise with her footwork, she is not a plodder, more like a frisky filly. Let's not ignore the fact that most freshman have a learning curve. We will have to wait to see how steep Her's and the rest of our newbies will be. Pls forgive the analogies to the animal kingdom, I got carried away.

+1
A giraffe can run over 35 mph but it takes several strides to reach speed. Fast but not quick. ONO fast. Patterson has extremely quick feet for someone thought to be a paint player.
Quick feet can move the wrong way just like slow feet and the question is how advanced is Patterson's skill set.
I want to hear Geno say "Patterson? You ask her to do something and she does it." That will indicate to me that she's in the mix.

 

[Cuango]

IMO you need to look at the strengths they bring and not worry who starts and get caught up in all of that. And most importantly what have we heard Geno say many, many times? "Do what you're good at."

For example just looking at Ayanna for discussion; did you know in Ayanna's junior year she was guarding the sr Caroline and basically shut her down in a summer league game? You think Caroline is a starter, right? Yet the summer before Ayanna shut her down. It's because she is a freak athlete with good size. Don't you agree she will be in the 99% percentile in WCBB athleticism and that she is very strong and has decent 6'2 size? That defense is and always has been welcome at UCONN.

So not only defense, but she is probably going to be able to offensive rebound, right? And because she is bigger/stronger and to a certain extent more athletic inside than Aubrey Griffin, she'll probably be able to finish inside better too, right? And any player around her size 5'10 to 6'4, she'll probably be able to defend in an excellent manner, right? These things aren't highlighted during these all-star games.

And add to that, did you know she is a good ball-handler? How can she highlight that in the all-star games when the guards want to showcase their talents while she is stuck inside?

UCONN doesn't play one-on-one. She is a tremendous fit for the 4 position. Some think she is more of a 3, I don't agree. The only way she sees significant time at the 3, excluding blowouts, is if Lou just can't cut it. So in summery, early in her career she'll be more athletic than 99% of the competition thus able to defend near any player near her size while also have enough explosive combination of athleticism and strength be able to rebound both offense and defense while also progressing by scoring inside then as her career progresses hit outside shots more effectively. All-the-while she is a good ball handler with quickness for her size in which each year (not much her 1st year) will become apparent.

Obviously, I have nothing to back this up beyond pictures and videos, but I would not be at all surprised if Ayanna is much closer to 6’3” than her reported 6’2”! Every time I see her, she for sure looks taller than Caroline and looks to be equal (or taller) than Ice & Aliyah. Perhaps this is simply wishful thinking but “That’s my story and I’m sticking to it”!

 

[Mdoggie]

I saw Ice and Ayanna play in games with the top players in the country.....I was not impressed. They have a long way to go before they can start at UCONN

Were those top players running UConns offense and sharing the play. Passing to the player with the best shot not the next shot?

 

[Alydar]

I've seen two of their games. In the first one, Ayanna managed to keep Ashlynn under control. But in the second one, when Ashlynn was a junior, she wasn't really able to. Ashlynn led a rout.

To everyone else who's responded, I don't mean to say Caroline is too slow, or Ayanna either. I like their speed just fine. And I'm endlessly impressed with Caroline's moves in the lane and her footwork. She's plenty fast enough for the role she's carved out for herself. But I wouldn't ask either one to guard a speedy shooting guard without help. Often, "help" can solve the problem, but sometimes a speedy guard just can't be contained. KML was often put in situations where she just wasn't quick enough to guard some players for lack of foot speed. But she was too good a shooter to take out.

We can dream of a lineup with Azzi Caroline Ayanna Aaliyah Dorka -- it looks pretty awesome for some occasions. But it will be a slow lineup overall (watch the UCLA game to see what the looks like). If having Ayanna play the 3 solves a particular problem, I'm all for it. I'm not sure I can imagine a situation where it would help to have her playing the 2. Her natural position looks to me to be the 4. I don't want to spend all that athleticism on the perimeter.

Slow against a team that plays 4 Dangerfields for sure but slow overall? That's one of the last phrases I'd use to describe that lineup. Edwards runs like a gazelle. You think Fudd has no quickness? You must have passed judgement last November when she tried to play through her foot injury. She was a step slow then.

 

[Bone Dog]

Slow against a team that plays 4 Dangerfields for sure but slow overall? That's one of the last phrases I'd use to describe that lineup. Edwards runs like a gazelle. You think Fudd has no quickness? You must have passed judgement last November when she tried to play through her foot injury. She was a step slow then.

I didn't mean each of them would be slow. The unit as a whole would be slow. Fudd is very quick. Like I've urged others to do, watch the UCLA game from last year and watch what happened when we had Olivia Dorka Aliyah on the floor together with Evina and Christyn. They were slow -- not Evina and Christyn, but the entire unit. Rotations were slow or late, we couldn't switch readily, which meant UCLA could get open shots and paths down the lane. Charisma Osborne Jaelynn Penn, even IImar'i Thomas, beat us to the ball and the hoop. This isn't for the whole game, of course, but for the time when we played that unit. We won the game. largely because of 4th quarter heroics. And even though we eventually won by 10, watch the final 1:30 for a scary ride.

 

[Alydar]

I didn't mean each of them would be slow. The unit as a whole would be slow. Fudd is very quick. Like I've urged others to do, watch the UCLA game from last year and watch what happened when we had Olivia Dorka Aliyah on the floor together with Evina and Christyn. They were slow -- not Evina and Christyn, but the entire unit. Rotations were slow or late, we couldn't switch readily, which meant UCLA could get open shots and paths down the lane. Charisma Osborne Jaelynn Penn, even IImar'i Thomas, beat us to the ball and the hoop. This isn't for the whole game, of course, but for the time when we played that unit. We won the game. largely because of 4th quarter heroics. And even though we eventually won by 10, watch the final 1:30 for a scary ride.

Tough time last December. Starting pg and leading scorer out; backup pg - out; best shooter - OUT. UConn played 7 and No 7 DeBerry played 2 minutes. The five starters and Edwards held UCLA to 61 pts and a 10 point win. I won't dispute what you saw but the entire team had to stay out of foul trouble (Edwards had zero fouls).
Besides, 60% of the group you listed are gone. Juhasz remains (16pts, 16rbs) And I have a hard time drawing any conclusions based on last year's numbers. Chaos reigned and roles were redefined weekly. I think that will pay off this year. When handicapping a horse's chances I like to see that it had unusual trouble in it's last race. People will just see the finish position and draw their conclusion but sometimes you have to look past the raw numbers.

 

[Bone Dog]

Tough time last December. Starting pg and leading scorer out; backup pg - out; best shooter - OUT. UConn played 7 and No 7 DeBerry played 2 minutes. The five starters and Edwards held UCLA to 61 pts and a 10 point win. I won't dispute what you saw but the entire team had to stay out of foul trouble (Edwards had zero fouls).
Besides, 60% of the group you listed are gone. Juhasz remains (16pts, 16rbs) And I have a hard time drawing any conclusions based on last year's numbers. Chaos reigned and roles were redefined weekly. I think that will pay off this year. When handicapping a horse's chances I like to see that it had unusual trouble in it's last race. People will just see the finish position and draw their conclusion but sometimes you have to look past the raw numbers.

I agree with your assessment and your optimism. I only cite that game as an easy way to see what happens when we put a big team on the floor. The speedy little folks are important too. If we play a big squad, we are vulnerable to that. Tennessee last year was in this situation often — a quite large team but lacking in overall team speed. We had better options once more of our guards could play.

 

[SVCBeercats]

I think it depends on two things about Ayanna: (a) the range, quality and reliability of her jump shot; and (b) the speed with which she picks up the UConn system and the decision-making that goes with it. Those are the areas where I think Caroline has an edge, perhaps a decided edge.

Yep, two freshmen will dominate UCONN's front court. Sure that will happen. Ayanna will displace Caroline. http://thesteelersfans.com/forums/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/rotfl.gif

 

[SVCBeercats]

I believe each of them was 6'2", and arguably, they were the most dominant front court in the country.

Lauren Betts

 

[Stymie]

I believe each of them was 6'2", and arguably, they were the most dominant front court in the country.

20 years ago.
Game has changed.
Players are bigger.

 

[Zarathustra]

I disagree on Ayanna's quickness. Watching the all-star games I saw Ayanna often switch off on guards while she more than held her own. She was like watching an Octopuses arms going everywhere. I think we are in for a big surprise with her footwork, she is not a plodder, more like a frisky filly. Let's not ignore the fact that most freshman have a learning curve. We will have to wait to see how steep Her's and the rest of our newbies will be. Pls forgive the analogies to the animal kingdom, I got carried away.

I saw Ayanna be " quick" in the FIBA 3X3 tournament with Kiki Rice, Ms. Barker, and M Williams. Yanna
had a number of quick defensive moves and stunning blocks in the 3 X 3 matchup with Germany
(if memory serves be correctly). The German ladies seemed more than surprised, even though
they saw Yanna doing dunks in the warmups. See the replays on YouTube/ Fiba 3X3 2021.
Go Yanna, Go Huskies!

 

[Alydar]

I agree with your assessment and your optimism. I only cite that game as an easy way to see what happens when we put a big team on the floor. The speedy little folks are important too. If we play a big squad, we are vulnerable to that. Tennessee last year was in this situation often — a quite large team but lacking in overall team speed. We had better options once more of our guards could play.

+1

Those UCLA drives down the lane do make UConn's guards appear slow but I'll wager if you add up all the points UCLA scored on those drives it wouldn't be more than 25 or so. A dozen drives looks like more than it is. UConn played without 3 backcourt players and won by double digits.

I can remember playing the Bruins in the regionals one year when they had a very quick backcourt and it was the same result.

 

[Bone Dog]

+1

Those UCLA drives down the lane do make UConn's guards appear slow but I'll wager if you add up all the points UCLA scored on those drives it wouldn't be more than 25 or so. A dozen drives looks like more than it is. UConn played without 3 backcourt players and won by double digits.

I can remember playing the Bruins in the regionals one year when they had a very quick backcourt and it was the same result.

You don’t have to defend UConn to me. I think we showed a lot of pluck that day. But there’s more to this story.

It would have been even more embarrassing losing to them than to Ga Tech. Two of those losses would have been demoralizing. In the first quarter, it looked like we were sleepwalking until Evina put the team on her back and shot us back into competitive range. Those drives to the lane might not seem so damaging (points wise) now, but at the time I imagine the girls felt like they were losing control of the game. It took a lot character to pull the team back from that emotional precipice.

Thinking of the Louisville game, which Caroline was so timely in. Playing them close might not have been possible if we’d lost in this one.

 

[Alydar]

You don’t have to defend UConn to me. I think we showed a lot of pluck that day. But there’s more to this story.

It would have been even more embarrassing losing to them than to Ga Tech. Two of those losses would have been demoralizing. In the first quarter, it looked like we were sleepwalking until Evina put the team on her back and shot us back into competitive range. Those drives to the lane might not seem so damaging (points wise) now, but at the time I imagine the girls felt like they were losing control of the game. It took a lot character to pull the team back from that emotional precipice.

Thinking of the Louisville game, which Caroline was so timely in. Playing them close might not have been possible if we’d lost in this one.

The Boston Celtics of the 60's had a very effective defensive strategy; force opposing guards to drive down the middle of the lane where Russell would destroy them. Russell didn't play for the Huskies so the UConn defense switched on all screens, passing opposing ball handlers from player to player. It was/is very effective in stopping drives off screens but when your roster is down 3 guards it becomes problematic.

I think of last season (up until the BET) as a nightmare. I don't dwell on bad dreams. My mother taught me that if I just turn my pillow over I could safely go back to sleep and forget the nightmare. It worked every time.

 

[Bone Dog]

The Boston Celtics of the 60's had a very effective defensive strategy; force opposing guards to drive down the middle of the lane where Russell would destroy them. Russell didn't play for the Huskies so the UConn defense switched on all screens, passing opposing ball handlers from player to player. It was/is very effective in stopping drives off screens but when your roster is down 3 guards it becomes problematic.

I think of last season (up until the BET) as a nightmare. I don't dwell on bad dreams. My mother taught me that if I just turn my pillow over I could safely go back to sleep and forget the nightmare. It worked every time.

I totally know what you mean. There are some games I just can't watch replays of and the Louisville game is one of them. Also the loss to Arizona two years ago. Too painful. And there's no way I can watch last year's NC game against SC. Way too painful. On the other hand, starting with Azzi's resurgence, there are some delightful games to enjoy before the BET, like the first Marquette game. I highly recommend it. And the Tennessee game. Azzi absolutely owned those teams.

Surprisingly, I still enjoy watching that ND game -- at least the first 38 minutes, before Paige's injury. But there was something wonderful about the way she turned all their foul-fakery (acting so as to get a call -- it seemed like their main tactic) against them in the second half. They got what they deserved.

 

[DEpup]

I'm really interested to see Azzi shift over to PG when Nika is off the floor. She has the skills and largely ran offense in the half court during her last international play when she was still having the foot issues. Then you can get a mash up of Lou and Caroline at the 2 with Aubrey or Ayanna at the 3 for periods of time. All 4 of them can mash up to cover those 2 positions and even change between offense and defense. A lot of versatility.

 

[sun]

For the UConn players who want to enhance their individual national reputations as being future WNBA stars, this is their golden opportunity.
Not to mention improving their own NIL opportunities.
Nothing speaks louder than being successful as underdogs with the odds stacked against them to begin the season.
You know that will be the theme of any nationally televised games that they play, even though that might change going into the NCAAT's.
A lot depends on the emerging stars and how much noise they can make on the court as a team.
The sooner they click together the better.

 

[Alydar]

I'm really interested to see Azzi shift over to PG when Nika is off the floor. She has the skills and largely ran offense in the half court during her last international play when she was still having the foot issues. Then you can get a mash up of Lou and Caroline at the 2 with Aubrey or Ayanna at the 3 for periods of time. All 4 of them can mash up to cover those 2 positions and even change between offense and defense. A lot of versatility.

If Geno can find 2 or 3 legit outside scorers then Fudd will be able to play some pg. If not she will stay at the 2/3. I think there are better outside alternatives this season than were available in the 2021 season.