- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 20,310
- Reaction Score
- 116,596
Head coaches in Division III don't even make that much.Is Miller even making that much as a DIII assistant?
Head coaches in Division III don't even make that much.Is Miller even making that much as a DIII assistant?
I'd like this 1000 times if I could. It's getting ridiculous and Ollie's lawyers sound more dumb every time they speak to the media or release statements.Representing the high profile client is challenging. I think KO's counsel have done him a disservice by running their standard scorched earth campaign.
Well, it takes 2 to tango. So, GM reciprocated on the defense by hiring Whaling City-based Drzislav (Dado) CoricAs you all know, Chief isn’t a fan of GM. Having said that if you are going to make a big case about it, you don’t hire some attorney from New London to take you to the promise land. No offense to anyone from New London but you just don’t do it - you go uptown. KO, what are you thinking?
As you all know, Chief isn’t a fan of GM. Having said that if you are going to make a big case about it, you don’t hire some attorney from New London to take you to the promise land. No offense to anyone from New London but you just don’t do it - you go uptown. KO, what are you thinking?
I don't think that Miller is worth millions so it is the old blood from a stone thing. Assistant coach salary at Div. 3 St. Joe's is likely not 6 figures.Could be a win-win. Ollie gets his millions from Miller. Then he drops his case against UConn and two sides make up and UConn brings KO back into the alumni family.
No, I don't think this would happen, but it would be cool!
That time passed a while ago.I don't think that Miller is worth millions so it is the old blood from a stone thing. Assistant coach salary at Div. 3 St. Joe's is likely not 6 figures.
UConn needs to negotiate in good faith with Ollie and make this go away.
One of Kevin Ollie’s weaknesses is that he’s not very bright.
He seems bent on proving it with this case against Miller.
The part I don't get about all this is why certain posters seem to think it's somehow morally reprehensible that UCONN chose to terminate Ollie's employment based on cause instead of failing to uphold the terms of employment. The school is being painted as the bad guy, even though there is ample evidence that Ollie violated NCAA rules.
Under contract law, you use any and every legal argument to advance your cause. The school chose to rely on contract terms which Ollie breached. Just because he was also guilty of not living up to other terms related to performance doesn't make the school morally bankrupt for taking the best possible legal position the school can take.
Ollie seems to have been lying to everybody all along. He lied to Benedict's face when all the NCAA violations stuff hit, and then he tripled down by lying to the NCAA and his attorneys. His lawyers appear to have been flying blind since day one. He's put them in a completely untenable situation. With Ollie stonewalling, denying everything, and topping it all off with ridiculous and seemingly endless frivolous litigation, how any rational person can conclude he's the victim here is beyond my comprehension. The school is doing what they have to do and should be doing, period. Ollie should have bailed with the 2.5 million. He has since cost himself his entire personal and professional reputations, something he may never get back.
That’s really the issue. He had no business getting the job in the first place. As much as we all love JC he pulled a Ryan Gomes here. Ollie was gifted the job of a lifetime based on his reputation as a tireless worker. 4 years later he tells one of his best players to “get in the gym” when asked for specific off-season goals.
Spot on! Only edit is $2.5 million not $2.0 million.
They had Bazz and no one else did.
Don’t kid yourself. The league matters.Great to hear from you KO, hope all is well. Your post is completely ridiculous.
There are tons of good basketball players and UConn can absolutely thrive as an elite program recruiting the New England prep schools, CT, MA, NYC, NJ and Baltimore/DC. 5* stars are nice but a steady diet of 4* guys will get the job done if the coach has the chops to be elite.
The part I don't get about all this is why certain posters seem to think it's somehow morally reprehensible that UCONN chose to terminate Ollie's employment based on cause instead of failing to uphold the terms of employment. The school is being painted as the bad guy, even though there is ample evidence that Ollie violated NCAA rules.
Under contract law, you use any and every legal argument to advance your cause. The school chose to rely on contract terms which Ollie breached. Just because he was also guilty of not living up to other terms related to performance doesn't make the school morally bankrupt for taking the best possible legal position the school can take.
Ollie seems to have been lying to everybody all along. He lied to Benedict's face when all the NCAA violations stuff hit, and then he tripled down by lying to the NCAA and his attorneys. His lawyers appear to have been flying blind since day one. He's put them in a completely untenable situation. With Ollie stonewalling, denying everything, and topping it all off with ridiculous and seemingly endless frivolous litigation, how any rational person can conclude he's the victim here is beyond my comprehension. The school is doing what they have to do and should be doing, period. Ollie should have bailed with the 2.5 million. He has since cost himself his entire personal and professional reputations, something he may never get back.

Was a contract for the representation ever signed between them?What is the contradiction there?
I don't see how there's a contradiction at all.
And yes he was his agent.
Did someone say UConn is morally reprehensible? I didn't read that from anyone. I think most are saying that, if indeed this backfires on Ollie and it's proven that he lied here, then it will backfire badly on UConn. In which case, UConn will have to take some of the blame for letting it get to this.
I haven't read anything about UConn taking a reprehensible moral stance.
I didn't indicate that anybody said it. It just seems to me that the thrust of the argument from some of the Ollie apologistas amounts to moral indignation, if they think he deserves to be paid 10.7 million dollars just because he's a good UCONN guy, but with zero legal grounds to support such an action. They're acting like it's simply the right thing to do. Then they portray the school as the bad guy for not doing it. That seems to me like a moral rather than a legal reason to pay him anything.
Was a contract for the representation ever signed between them?
(Hint: the answer is no.)
And it was almost in haiku:Ollie realizes career over, desperately grasps at straws. Only took me 8.
Like a heart attack. Am I wrong?What?
You can't be serious.
Ollie realizesNow make it a Haiku.
Epic! Lol.Sing with me...to the tune of All in the Family :
What did ol' Glenn Miller say?
KO now wants him to pay!!
All of this just sounds so gay.
These are the days!!
Remember when our toes were in!!!
Then KO started relaxin'!! [sluuurp]
Payed a lot to get Shonn Miller and his mom to come in...
We didn't want KO no more.
DB seemed to know the score.
Winning ways, time to restore.
Those...were...the....days!!!!!
Good post. So why is everyone here so shocked that Ollie is using "...any and every legal argument to advance your cause".
He out coached a lot of great coaches with minimal talent? After the ncaa tournament in 2014 I would love even one example.We all love UConn but if I’m a player that can live in Texas, Arizona, Florida, California or any other state we have to recruit against, I’m going there elsewhere. We all love ice cream and the dairy barn but have you been to Some of the other campuses? Uconn was the 2nd choice for a lot of 5 star recruits that ended up at Kentucky, Arizona, Duke etc. which is a testament to how many players on the circuit loved Ollie and what he stood for. We have to be real about this, the lure of UConn isn’t the same. There has to be a niche for recruiting great mid major talent moving forward. I’m sure Ollie cared about his job and did everything he could to work at his craft and put the time in daily. The breakup of Big East killed the run for recruits. He out coached a lot of great coaches with minimal talent. Let’s be sensible about this.
Well, I haven't read that from anyone but it could be someone said that. I've repeatedly said I don't care what happens to Ollie in this. I've highlighted that if it's proved Ollie paid $30k, UConn will get dinged badly, and it's the sort of thing best avoided by paying a buyout. That's not moral reasoning. It's practical.
Because sophisticated representation uses every legal argument in a manner that is likely to achieve a client’s best outcome all things being considered. From day 1 they started down the wrong path and have dug the hole progressively deeper. Where UConn feels pressure is politically and with their alumni base. Had he played out the favorite son card in public, and argued he failed but was being treated poorly and wanted a reasonable resolution, any intransigence on the part of UConn would have been negatively received. His legal team had to know that UConn’s strategy would attrition and delay. The harder he comes at them with wild theories, the easier it is to justify continued fighting. UConn wins every day it doesn’t have to pay $10 Million.Good post. So why is everyone here so shocked that Ollie is using "...any and every legal argument to advance your cause".