swami7774
I know things.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 860
- Reaction Score
- 2,087
Didn’t say it was the problem. It is A problem.The conference is an issue but was not the problem.
Didn’t say it was the problem. It is A problem.The conference is an issue but was not the problem.
Every time that I hear this, I question whether there is an open invitation to the Big East. You have to be asked and our profile is very different Why would the BE want us? We don't fit their model and we would be coming in as a weak cousin. Would love to see it but don't think it will happen.
What rumors?
Like who?
I'm so sick of the excuse about the conference. If the conference stinks so bad then win all the friggin' games in the conference. Cincinnati is projected as a 2 seed in the NCAA Tournament with recruits that mostly weren't very highly ranked. Houston is a lock for the NCAA Tournament with talent that isn't great. Would Ollie have won a lot with Houston's players?The conference is an issue but was not the problem.
AD Dave may or may not have one foot out the door.
Since it keeps getting brought up, what happens to the football program if basketball goes back to the Big East 2.0? Stay in the AAC as football only? MAC? Independent? Back to FCS? Fold up the tent? Guess they can use that $100 million stadium on Silver Lane for high school games. Whatever - the hoop-only fans have the luxury of not caring.
no way he fires him if he doesn't plan to be here for a little while. why bother?AD Dave may or may not have one foot out the door.
If they can do this in this manner to KO, if I was a prospective coach I would wonder what tactics they would use to fire me. If he is being fired for losing, which we all know to be the case just say it and do it, you negociated the contract and now want to wiggle out. I actually would have more respect for Benedict if they didn't pull this crap. When they fired Perno at least they were honest and honorable doing it.
What exactly are you trying to say?
Fool? That's rich. Might want to check out Hurley's NCAA win total before you knock Ed Cooley's.Aren't you the same fool that argued that KO would be back next season?
That's a decision for the Athletic Director. Personally, I would be happy with Danny Hurley.
I don’t think it has to be a matter of ethics or morality. It’s business. Make no mistake about it - Kevin Ollie got fired for performance. The for cause language is legalease of sorts. Most of the world doesn’t get a buyout or severance of this magnitude. That’s not Ollie’s fault. But Its clear that Kevin Ollie thinks he’s owed the full amount and that UConn doesn’t. How much UConn can/will pay him is the issue. And that’s where the details matter. If a coach (or anyone else) doesn’t like it, don’t sign a contract that has a “for clause” component. And don’t create any reason for a “for clause” termination. Contracts work both ways.Yeah it is. If you did something wrong it shouldn't matter if winning or losing. Just how everyone here was upset about UNC. Who you are, how the team is doing shouldn't matter. It is wrong to have 2 sets of standards. If Benedict would have used this to fire him when he was winning as well as losing I'd have no problem. To have a sense of right or wrong change to suit your purpose is immoral and unethical. Just my values.
You understand that he had obligations to UConn too, and, as of right now, he left us a program that is under NCAA investigation, can't sniff the NIT bubble and has a blah recruiting class, right?
I hope they know what they are doing - I have little faith in the decision making of L McHugh and the BoT.
No way the AAC lets a middling at best football program stay in the conference if UConn moves their Olympic sports. Remember, they would lose UConn women too.
Still not sure how that has anything to do with asking who we're getting that is better than Ed Cooley. What did I miss?That you have no credibility in this matter.
Still not sure how that has anything to do with asking who we're getting that is better than Ed Cooley. What did I miss?
I wanted Ollie gone, but with no payout is pretty cold blooded and if so, then there may be some teeth to the NCAA probe, which isn’t good for anyone.
Sounds to me like Bluedogs merely understands a higher stakes world than you. This happens every day in the business world. Your lack of exposure or awareness to it shouldn’t leave you speechless. View this as a learning opportunity.Please tell us - what was the atmosphere like in that negotiating room and how much input did you have in the decision?
People who make these know it all statements as if they know something intimate about specific situations leave me speechless
Please tell me how would you handle the situation if you were KO (forgive me KO)
Wow if I'm another coach how happy would I be if they are trying to find a way for "just cause" on a guy who player here and won a national championship? Red flag
He wouldn't.Why would Cooley leave his upcoming Providence in the BIG East for UConn?
AD Dave may or may not have one foot out the door.
No way the AAC lets a middling at best football program stay in the conference if UConn moves their Olympic sports. Remember, they would lose UConn women too.
GREAT post - couldn't agree with you more Kathy
I was/am now not caring if KO stays or KO goes but if this was done to avoid some type of payment then it is totally wrong if they cannot pin something specific on KO and make it stick without even a shred of doubt.
If the AD David Benedict is gambling that by doing this early and getting the best possible person with the knowledge that they then can negotiate with KO (while the replacement knows there is little in form of damage control) - that is wrong - not saying that it is not done in business as a tactic - but to do it to a loyal colleague - is just plain wrong - IF that is the case
I have no idea right now but I am close to some folks most likely to know specifics involved and it will be interesting to hear snippets as time goes on.