You are looking at it from UConn(fans) point of view. This has nothing to do with UConn. It is all about the injustice to USF. As you have illustrated, USF's reward for surviving the difficult task above is to face UConn. Not the final four, but UConn. That's the point. Don't you think USF chances of making it to the final four from another region is higher? Two #1 seeds did not make it to the final four last year from the other regions. Ask Jose in which region he would prefer to be in.You do realize it's unlikely that it would get to UConn vs. USF in the tournament.
The following have to happen:
1. USF defeat FSU on their home court in round 2 -- very unlikely; road teams do not as a simple matter of fact win very often in the women's tournament first two rounds.
2. USF would then have to defeat South Carolina, the 2 seed in our region.
Then and only then would they get to play us for the regional final. Kind of unlikely.... But if they beat both the 2 and 3 seeds in our region, they will have earned the right in my opinion.
They probably hate Coach Staley for all the complaining she's done on so many topics.
Florida State almost beat South Carolina last year. Should be a good game.
Georgia does not score nearly enough points to beat UConn. Duke is coached by Joanne P. Nuff said.
I agree that Baylor should have been the number 1 seed and ND a 2. But once it was clear, which I knew at least 2 wks ago that was not to be the case, the writing was on the wall for SCar.Beat Notre Dame this year, and ND is probably a #2 Seed with Baylor as the #1 Seed in the Spokane Region. Then I think So Carolina ends up in Lexington. The two losses to the Lady Vols also hurt your chances to be the #1 two seed which also would have put your team in Lexington. Balancing the Bracket which is a committee responsibility put Baylor in Lexington as the #1 two seed. Albany was the closest Region after Baylor was put in Lexington. Got to win the Games you're supposed to. I know A'ja was hurt for one of the two Lady Vol losses.
How do you place the team with the best attendance in an already sold out Regional? Not sure what SC has done to the NCAA but it is clear they don't like us, especially after send us west the past 3 years and now placing us agaisnt the #1 team.
tOSU will be in Columbus for the FF, watching the games in their dorm rooms.I think it's interesting that OSU could start and end the tourney in the same city. First two rounds in Columbus, go somewhere else for the regionals, then the semi-final and championship also in Columbus.
Oh stop! SC lost six games! If they wanted to be a #1 seed they lost at least three too many games. Just because SC is the defending NC and has a big fan base doesn’t give them special props in terms of the bracket. A couple of years back UConn was sent to Lincoln despite being the overall #1 seed. They won the NC that year anyway. Baylor lost one game and is a #2 seed. So there.
My point was ND was sent away just like you were to Stockton as higher ranked #1 seeds stayed closer to home. I do not think the committee has it out for SC, just not ranked higher than other seeds who were closer to hosting regions so SC had to travel. I do think if A’ja stayed healthy and played in all your games you would would been a high 2 seed and maybe in in Spokane. So either way, Travel was in the cards.
No Gold Dome????? No preference!!!!!!!!!!!No Lexington? I mean the three years it's been there SC (the best team in the SEC for the past 5 years) has been sent elsewhere. I know I'm getting a lot of grief from fans for "whining" about our placement but I really just want an explanation.
Should crush them actually.
USF is a 6 seed in the region and is in the 21-24 seeding range. They weren’t going to ANY FINAL FOUR FROM ANY REGION. Besides beating an underachieving OSU at home, who did they play and beat? Even as the 6 seed they are on the other side of the bracket and have to beat #3 FSU in Tallahassee AND #2 SC in Albany before potentially facing UConn. Now let’s review other brackets 2/3’sYou are looking at it from UConn(fans) point of view. This has nothing to do with UConn. It is all about the injustice to USF. As you have illustrated, USF's reward for surviving the difficult task above is to face UConn. Not the final four, but UConn. That's the point. Don't you think USF chances of making it to the final four from another region is higher? Two #1 seeds did not make it to the final four last year from the other regions. Ask Jose in which region he would prefer to be in.
Of the 213 posts on this thread, only a few have come close to pointing out what I think is the salient fact for UConn fans: UConn cannot face more than one of the BIG Troika of Mississippi State / Baylor / Texas, and then only in the Final game.
Everyone (even Geno) seemed to agree that the teams with major size (mainly those three) would be the biggest threat to UConn’s chances. Now, with this bracket, at least two of those three will be eliminated before UConn can possibly play them.
The biggest and strongest player that UConn will have to face before the final game is A’ja Wilson, and while she is certainly deserving of being the Player of the Year and the probably #1 draft choice for the WNBA, she is NOT the biggest or strongest player in the field, and UConn has became fairly accustomed to facing her. Moreover, I don’t think she has the guard play around her that any of the three above-mentioned teams have around their bigs, which should make it easier for UConn to beat the Gamecocks yet again.
If UConn comes out of Albany with the Husky still growling, their semifinal game is likely to be against either Notre Dame or Oregon. They are both very good teams, but not as intimidating as those mentioned above. UConn knows how to play those games against those kinds of teams, and (since about 2013) has nearly always been successful.
UConn might have had to win its NC this year by playing Texas, Baylor, and Mississippi State in succession. This bracket removes that possibility entirely.
Obviously, I think the bracket is very favorable to UConn’s chances for an NC.
I think Oregon St brings their Orange and beat the LVs who have their own Oregon flavor going with 3 players from that state in their roster. Rueck vs. Holly in a chess match...really? I know who my money is on.MSU handled them pretty easily from the tip in Knoxville. If they get to Baylor I doubt it will be pretty for UT.

Absolutely agreeWho in this bracket is scary? UConn has the best bracket, IMO.
So I guess with Gabby's superiority to Aja, She will play her one on one with no double teams necessary. I can't wait for round 2She thought ... "Gabby Williams AGAIN!!! What the heck...no respect for me...after all I was the pre-ordained Player of the Year."
This is ABSURD! The selection committee is now just being blatant about their will for UConn to lose.

The Lexington Bracket has the #3 overall seed in Louisville and Baylor is #5, Oregon #6, not sure if Texas or SC was 7 with the other being #8. As Oregon is closest to Spokane, they get that spot vs. #4 overall ND, even thought they should be in Lexington as #6, so they swap with Baylor, any other swapping would be a further disservice to either UConn or MSU as the top 2 seeds.No Lexington? I mean the three years it's been there SC (the best team in the SEC for the past 5 years) has been sent elsewhere. I know I'm getting a lot of grief from fans for "whining" about our placement but I really just want an explanation.
USF not going to "any final four from any region" is your opinion not a fact. Injuries can happen. Uncharacteristic hot/poor shooting can happen. Poor officiating can happen. That is why they play. The point, and to answer your question, is any region besides UConn's. IOW, USF would be happier having to face any of the teams above, for the chance to play the number one seed (assuming they get by the #4 seed). Upset's are rare in the women's tournament, but if last year was any indication, it might be changing.USF is a 6 seed in the region and is in the 21-24 seeding range. They weren’t going to ANY FINAL FOUR FROM ANY REGION. Besides beating an underachieving OSU at home, who did they play and beat? Even as the 6 seed they are on the other side of the bracket and have to beat #3 FSU in Tallahassee AND #2 SC in Albany before potentially facing UConn. Now let’s review other brackets 2/3’s
KC is Texas/UCLA
Lex is Baylor/Tenn
Spok is Oregon/OSU
So just which set is easiest to get to play against the #1 seed? Maybe the Albany region but otherwise in no region would USF get to a regional final, let alone a FF.
Tennessee has to win 2 games in order to face Baylor.Tennessee still does not impress me.... Baylor will beat them
Huh? Oregon was #11 in both preseason polls. Ohio State was #5/#8 so yes the Buckeyes underachieved a bit.Correct me if I am wrong but at the beginning of season OHIO st and Oregon were both top 4? So both have underachieved if so LOL Kinda like how my Bruins have underachieved for 4 years, so c'mon prove me wrong!
Tennessee is 56-0 at home in NCAA tournament.Tennessee has to win 2 games in order to face Baylor.
Georgia beat Mercer handily back in November, and Georgia wasn't even playing that well back then. They got crushed at home by Texas right before Texas pooped their pants in Knoxville.I am rooting for Suzie Gardner and Mercer against Georgia. I think she got treated badly at Arkansas and am so happy for her that she has resurfaced with a team that is playing very well right now. I hope her Bears can give Georgia a good game.
Just the fact that they've played 56 home games in the NCAA tournament is a sad commentary on the sport.Tennessee is 56-0 at home in NCAA tournament.
Been waiting for someone to comment. Thanks DefenseBBI think Oregon St brings their Orange and beat the LVs who have their own Oregon flavor going with 3 players from that state in their roster. Rueck vs. Holly in a chess match...really? I know who my money is on.
Oregon St vs. BU would be very interesting.....
Not this Tennessee team.Tennessee is 56-0 at home in NCAA tournament.