I dont see why the SEC would have any interest in Clemson, nor the B1G in Stanford.For anyone who believes MHver has any credibility:
I can get you in on the ground floor of a new crypto currency that will make you rich in a few years. Cash only, small unmarked bills, minimum buy-in is $10,000 but it will be well worth it.
That is what immediately occurred to me.Big 10 didn’t want Stanford 2 years ago but they do now. Sure.
A lot of decent people have wasted a considerable amount of their lives hanging on these characters' every word with bated breath, hoping against hope that the hopeless will eventually come to pass.For anyone who believes MHver has any credibility:
I can get you in on the ground floor of a new crypto currency that will make you rich in a few years. Cash only, small unmarked bills, minimum buy-in is $10,000 but it will be well worth it.
Honestly, I don't think anyone else has an interest in Duke, which goes to the point that basketball success really doesn't matter.I dont see why the SEC would have any interest in Clemson, nor the B1G in Stanford.
Honestly, I don't think anyone else has an interest in Duke, which goes to the point that basketball success really doesn't matter.
Acknowledging the UGA football brand already in the SEC, possibly UNC hoop brand very evident in the Palmetto State along with USC, media and advertising decision makers may still like Clemson’s recent decades gridiron image despite the Tigers’ declining success.I dont see why the SEC would have any interest in Clemson, nor the B1G in Stanford.
Supposedly, that wasn't necessarily the case. The Big 10 wanted USC and UCLA, but when the Pac 12 blew up, they were willing to take Washington and Oregon earlier than expected at a reduced rate. There seemed to be interest in Stanford and maybe Cal, but the Big 10 was not willing to absorb 5 or 6 new schools at one time.Big 10 didn’t want Stanford 2 years ago but they do now. Sure.
A lot of decent people have wasted a considerable amount of their lives hanging on these characters' every word with bated breath, hoping against hope that the hopeless will eventually come to pass.
It might, but not because one of these wannabe keyboard warriors has any inside dope.
Acknowledging the UGA football brand already in the SEC, possibly UNC hoop brand very evident in the Palmetto State along with USC, media and advertising decision makers may still like Clemson’s recent decades gridiron image despite the Tigers’ declining success.
Stanford and B1G? Accommodating ND and B1G academic administrators, further B1G academic consortium Silicon Valley access and dinero? Athletics? Not football nor hoops success lately, IDK, overall athletic program annual success? Otherwise, no friggin clue.
Everyone likes a good train wreck!
I didn't know it changed from Cabela's to Bass Pro Shops. Bass Pro Shops acquierd Cabela's in 2017. BPS is elevating East Hartford and bringing in the big guns, so to speak. SEC!
Remember that we had a 10 game deal to do just that that, effectively, got vetoed by the state legislature. I often wonder whether our fortunes would've changed if that deal had gone through. The exposure would've been great for us, and having an ongoing relationship with ND might have been useful.Plus our football team is competitive again, I would take a ND or similar game at MetLife or Foxboro if available.
I do not think it will happen now. Now with revenue share teams need to maximize revenue. Unless you are an elite team or one of the service academies you are not getting that game.Remember that we had a 10 game deal to do just that that, effectively, got Vito by the state legislature. I often wonder whether or fortunes would've changed if that deal had gone through. The exposure would've been great for us, and having an ongoing relationship with ND might have been useful.