Which we know they never do.I have to admit that ACC expansion idea sounds real interesting. They’d have to move quickly.
My guess is that FSU and Clemson would sit quietly by until the new members are added and then claim that the terms in which they signed their GOR have substantially changed, thus voiding their GOR.The ACC expansion idea includes a serious obstacle, the GOR.
Would Clemson, FDU, etc sit quietly if new members to the conference weren't also tied to the same GOR that current ACC members are burdened with?
Would schools that believe (with at least a small amount of valid reasoning) they have a home waiting for them in the B1G at some point over the next half dozen years be willing to sign onto a GOR that still has a dozen years before light hits the end of the tunnel?
Anybody who joins would need to sign the GOR. Expansion enables the ACC to renegotiate the deal. If it would be net additive per school, that would probably help solve some of the issues they've had.The ACC expansion idea includes a serious obstacle, the GOR.
Would Clemson, FDU, etc sit quietly if new members to the conference weren't also tied to the same GOR that current ACC members are burdened with?
Would schools that believe (with at least a small amount of valid reasoning) they have a home waiting for them in the B1G at some point over the next half dozen years be willing to sign onto a GOR that still has a dozen years before light hits the end of the tunnel?
Which we know they never do.
The ACC expansion idea includes a serious obstacle, the GOR.
Would Clemson, FDU, etc sit quietly if new members to the conference weren't also tied to the same GOR that current ACC members are burdened with?
Would schools that believe (with at least a small amount of valid reasoning) they have a home waiting for them in the B1G at some point over the next half dozen years be willing to sign onto a GOR that still has a dozen years before light hits the end of the tunnel?
Can BC be an exception to that general rule?That being said we have no business throwing shade on anyone else’s football.
I'm just a little tired of programs who have never won anything and have been historically bad being given the benefit of the doubt while UConn is held to some bizarre impossible standard nobody else is held to...100% agreement. Certain folks on the board are more prone to that than others.
I'm tempted to say Oregon State will probably go back to being bad, but HC Smith was a QB there and lead them to a Fiesta Bowl under Dennis Erickson in 2000. He just signed a new six year deal. So maybe he stays and makes them at least better than putrid?
Bill Snyder has forever altered my view on whether historically bad teams will remain historically bad.
I think Yormark agrees with you. Let’s see if he can convince them. The truth is that UConn has a ton of football upside. We are far more likely to become a good than Arizona, which has been lousy for ages. We don’t get enough credit for our modest success in what was a good Big East football conference.I'm just a little tired of programs who have never won anything and have been historically bad being given the benefit of the doubt while UConn is held to some bizarre impossible standard nobody else is held to...
We get it, the school made terrible hires back to back to back but the idea UConn can't be good in the sport and no good coaches will ever want to go there are tiresome. UConn has a damn good coach right now, had some previous success before Randy snaked out of there and the school leadership was a mess. UConn wins championships all the time in basketball, brings a massive metro area and they've shown over and over they massively outperform everyone sports wise considering their resources due to conference realignment.
Fun fact: Arizona has finished ranked seven times in its entire football history. We're not talking about some powerhouse. Its football is marginally better than UConn and its basketball (MBB & WBB) is worse. It is at least a bigger market, though.I think Yormark agrees with you. Let’s see if he can convince them. The truth is that UConn has a ton of football upside. We are far more likely to become a good than Arizona, which has been lousy for ages. We don’t get enough credit for our modest success in what was a good Big East football conference.
It's a bigger market?Fun fact: Arizona has finished ranked seven times in its entire football history. We're not talking about some powerhouse. It's football is marginally better than UConn and its basketball (MBB & WBB) is worse. It is at least a bigger market, though.
Yeah, that’s my point. They suck. Not sure why Tucson is a bigger market. ASU has a better market, and football team.Fun fact: Arizona has finished ranked seven times in its entire football history. We're not talking about some powerhouse. It's football is marginally better than UConn and its basketball (MBB & WBB) is worse. It is at least a bigger market, though.
For all the talk of expanding to the East, I suspect the University presidents are more comfortable with extending their perimeter. Hence, Colorado (the worst PAC football team, but an old member that was good under one coach three decades ago) and perhaps Arizona (who as you say is far from a power).Fun fact: Arizona has finished ranked seven times in its entire football history. We're not talking about some powerhouse. It's football is marginally better than UConn and its basketball (MBB & WBB) is worse. It is at least a bigger market, though.
I was counting the whole state. But yeah, you know what, **** 'em.It's a bigger market?
It's a bigger market?
University of Arizona is in Tucson. If they're claiming Phoenix then surely we can claim NYC and Boston.Phoenix is 2.1M homes and #11, Tucson is another 400K. CT is about 1.35 Million TV Homes, including Fairfield County.
Right? A city with a bigger school right on the middle of it (basically).University of Arizona is in Tucson. If they're claiming Phoenix then surely we can claim NYC and Boston.
Arizona is additive—as is Colorado—in a way I don't think Utah is. I think UConn and Arizona State (even with Arizona) is also additive. In UConn's case, in part because Cincy, West Virginia, and UCF are already far outside the perimeter, but also in part because of access to NYC.For all the talk of expanding to the East, I suspect the University presidents are more comfortable with extending their perimeter. Hence, Colorado (the worst PAC football team, but an old member that was good under one coach three decades ago) and perhaps Arizona (who as you say is far from a power).
To be fair, in the northeast there are far more schools per capita. UConn and Arizona get the "state pride" bump for non graduates in-state, but a greater percentage of college graduates in Phoenix would have gone to Arizona and Arizona State than is the case for UConn in either Boston or New York.University of Arizona is in Tucson. If they're claiming Phoenix then surely we can claim NYC and Boston.