So much hostility on this boardOk buddy.
The Big East was always a dead man walking.
So much hostility on this boardOk buddy.
The Big East was always a dead man walking.
Yes.So much hostility on this board
"They drag you into the gutter, then try to win with experience"
Right at that moment the football schools should have broken away. Had that happened they would have been the poachERS. But who knew what was coming?If the Big East had gotten Penn State who's to say we wouldn't have been the poacher instead of the poachee. As Tranghese told Gavitt, the Big East would rue the day they didn't admit Penn State.
Yes.
Truth be told, a Penn State Big East would have been the hunter, not the prey.
You probably don't recall how vastly different the football landscape was during the Gavitt Big East era.The PAC 12 didn’t even make it. You think a a top heavy Big East with one more big school like Penn State would be the hunter with a non proactive schmuck like Tranghese was going to be the hunter? Sure ok.
Additionally you fail to realize that quote comes from the era of Dave Gavitt being the Big East commissioner. Tranghese was an assistant.The PAC 12 didn’t even make it. You think a a top heavy Big East with one more big school like Penn State would be the hunter with a non proactive schmuck like Tranghese was going to be the hunter? Sure ok.
You probably don't recall how vastly different the football landscape was during the Gavitt Big East era.
No football school is gonna stay in a conference of basketball only schools. That is true of UConn too medium and long term.The PAC 12 didn’t even make it. You think a a top heavy Big East with one more big school like Penn State would be the hunter with a non proactive schmuck like Tranghese was going to be the hunter? Sure ok.
It's all relative. The Big East most certainly could have been a poacher. For a while longer anyway. At the end of the day there are 2 conference destinations. Everyone else is a stepping stone.I love your little journey through alternative history but sorry. Your argument holds no water.
Big East was always a parts shop.
It's all relative. The Big East most certainly could have been a poacher. For a while longer anyway. At the end of the day there are 2 conference destinations. Everyone else is a stepping stone.
what about Gavitt? The Penn State thing happened under his watch.Tranghese never had the proactive vision to do that.
You guys might as well be wondering what would happen if Lincoln wasn’t shot.
Oh yeah, where is UConn going?No football school is gonna stay in a conference of basketball only schools. That is true of UConn too medium and long term.
If the Big East had gotten Penn State who's to say we wouldn't have been the poacher instead of the poachee. As Tranghese told Gavitt, the Big East would rue the day they didn't admit Penn State.
UConn is a BB school. We all know that. Ne'er the twain shall meet in our world, I guess. That is the whole point.Oh yeah, where is UConn going?
painttouches.com
Haha. You should start a thread about it.Big East hoops merge w the leftovers please.
(It would be cool for Cooper to get to play Duke in a conference game)
Oh shoot, has this been done? I just helicopter in these days when I get an email.Haha. You should start a thread about it.
No. There are already 4 threads on him. I figured a fifth wouldn’t hurt.Oh shoot, has this been done? I just helicopter in these days when I get an email.
I've stopped having any confidence in that.UConn might actually get an invite in that scenario.
The reason why Penn State couldn't organize with the other northeastern football schools is because Penn State demanded unequal distributions. If the other schools had agreed to that, and if this model worked for Penn State, they might've been able to entice schools like Florida St. Heck, Florida St was already one of the schools talking with Penn State in the 1st place.The PAC 12 didn’t even make it. You think a a top heavy Big East with one more big school like Penn State would be the hunter with a non proactive schmuck like Tranghese was going to be the hunter? Sure ok.
Both of these items are news to me. I thought that the whole point was to establish a northeast all sports conference. This is actually the first I've heard that Penn State was pitching unequal distributions. At the time, I don't feel like it had the throw weight to make that stick.The reason why Penn State couldn't organize with the other northeastern football schools is because Penn State demanded unequal distributions. If the other schools had agreed to that, and if this model worked for Penn State, they might've been able to entice schools like Florida St. Heck, Florida St was already one of the schools talking with Penn State in the 1st place.
...superconferences will generate more games, not fewer. By adopting divisional play—six, seven or eight teams to a division—the superconferences would be able to take advantage of a long-ignored NCAA bylaw that permits an extra game, beyond the annual limit of 11, to determine a conference championship. A logical subsequent step would be to take the four superconference champs and hold a national-championship playoff; this would involve two more postseason games...
Some of where we are in football started in 1990...Football Independency started to collapse and teams looked for a conference to join.
....That was the year that Notre Dame signed their own media deal
....That was the year that Penn State joined the Big Ten
....That was the year that Independents started looking for conferences
------South Carolina to SEC 1991
------Miami, WVU, VT, Rutgers to Big East football 1991
------FSU to ACC 1992
FROM 1990 Article...kind of prophetic.
...superconferences will generate more games, not fewer. By adopting divisional play—six, seven or eight teams to a division—the superconferences would be able to take advantage of a long-ignored NCAA bylaw that permits an extra game, beyond the annual limit of 11, to determine a conference championship. A logical subsequent step would be to take the four superconference champs and hold a national-championship playoff; this would involve two more postseason games...
Yes, I'm referring to the northeast all-sports conference. It would've happened if Penn State hadn't insisted on unequal distributions. At the time PSU was coming off undefeated regular season, national championship game in the Sugar Bowl against Alabama, considered controversial loss by PSU fans.Both of these items are news to me. I thought that the whole point was to establish a northeast all sports conference. This is actually the first I've heard that Penn State was pitching unequal distributions. At the time, I don't feel like it had the throw weight to make that stick.