Non-Key Tweets

CL82 · May 9, 2016

Charley Horse said:
You know, despite the incredible speculations on the part of Lambert and MH ver 3 somewhat tainting public opinion, WVU has really been an absolutely wonderful addition to the Big 12 conference.

I get the sense that there has been some buyers remorse on the WVU's part. The money is good and P5 status is great, but being and island has been tough on them financially and negatively impacts the fan's ability to travel. It was their best option at the time though.

Now if the Big 12 goes east, life gets better for them. West? Not so much.

Charley Horse · May 9, 2016

CL82 said:
I get the sense that there has been some buyers remorse on the WVU's part. The money is good and P5 status is great, but being and island has been tough on them financially and negatively impacts the fan's ability to travel. It was their best option at the time though.

Now if the Big 12 goes east, life gets better for them. West? Not so much.

I agree.

And I think the Big 12 owes them that.

In hindsight, instead of taking TCU and arguing about whether to take WVU and Louisville, the Big 12 should've taken both WVU and Louisville and passed on TCU.

Yes, TCU has a good football team and pretty uniforms, but...

The Big 12 already had the north Texas market covered with OU and with an enrollment of 10,000 or so, TCU is such a small school any way.

UConnJim · May 9, 2016

Football revenues have driven conference realignment over the past few years, but it's due to a quirk in the NCAA revenue model. Football revenues mostly stay with conferences. Basketball revenues (think NCAA tournament) on the other hand, get haircut by the NCAA to fund their bureaucracy, non-revenue sports, and other divisions. College basketball is just as lucrative as college football, but the way revenues are distributed, football revenues are currently more important. Could the revenue distribution model change in the future? Don't know, but if I was a conference commissioner, I would make sure I had a strong basketball conference as well as a strong football conference. In other words, basketball should matter.

dwalks93 · May 9, 2016

Charley Horse said:
You know, despite the incredible speculations on the part of Lambert and MH ver 3 somewhat tainting public opinion, WVU has really been an absolutely wonderful addition to the Big 12 conference.

WVU's saga should be a cautionary tale to the Big12 programs. There is no place like home and when you lose geographic relevance it harms your program.

In fairness to WVU the Big East was imploding and they had to take the only chair at the P5 table they could get. It is hard to feel too sorry for them compared to where we are now. Sadly UConn is now in the same situation as WVU was which means taking any P5 offer we can get.

All that said, the vast majority of teams who leave their original conference are later disappointed. Sure Nebraska may have more money but do they feel the same relevance in the BIG? What about Syracuse, Pittsburgh and BC...are they better off now than they were in BE? Rutgers has a lot of money but to date they are a punch line in the BIG. Has Colorado prospered in the PAC? Is WVU succeeding in the Big12 the way it did in the BE? Perhaps TA&M and Missouri are happier now but, if so, that is more a product of Big12 politics than SEC relevance. In summation, the only programs which IMO have benefited in conference realignment are those programs which moved up to P5 (TCU and Louisville) and not those that made lateral moves.

UT does not want the Big12 to change but it cannot stay the same, OU has made that very clear. UT is a "value add" to nearly any conference but it won't be UT's conference like the Big12. Right now Big12 teams are complaining about not playing each other every year if they expand. What about never playing each other again? Does UT want to be an "also" program behind OSU/Mich? Would the ACC ever really be home for UT? Is UT playing at 10PM at night in the PAC what they want?

Is the future UT the same without playing in a Texas focused conference against historic rivals like Oklahoma? Will any of the Big12 schools be as great as they were before if the Big12 breaks up? As the BIG/SEC shows the strength of a conference far exceeds the value of its individual members. Being the "new guy" outlier in someone else's conference never seems to be a recipe for success.

Sometime it is better to own your own smaller home than lease a luxury apartment in someone else's building....It just amazes me how most schools always take the money and think "we are the exception...we are the team that will move to another conference and flourish." I am interested to see if UT falls prey to this hubris...at the end of the day whether the Big12 survives is up to UT.

CallMeBruce · May 9, 2016

Charley Horse said:
And like Texas would screw all of its non-revenue sports teams by going independent.

I'm not going to get into the other stuff, but as far as this goes, I think his suggestion was the UT would play all of its other sports in the ACC while going independent in football, ND-style.

huskymedic · May 9, 2016

frankthetank111 11:42am via Twitter Web Client
I've long seen BYU and Cincinnati as the top *realistic* Big 12 options. UConn is strong if geography doesn't matter. The Big 12 Expansion Index: Wake Me Up When It’s All Over

CL82 · May 9, 2016

huskymedic said:
frankthetank111 11:42am via Twitter Web Client
I've long seen BYU and Cincinnati as the top *realistic* Big 12 options. UConn is strong if geography doesn't matter. The Big 12 Expansion Index: Wake Me Up When It’s All Over

Highlights:

To be sure, how well a school plays football (and to a much lesser extent, basketball) is certainly relevant, but TV markets, demographic changes and academic rankings are factors that really get university presidents get much more engaged.
Football Brand Value (30 points) It must be emphasized that Football Brand Value puts much more weight on the long-term history and financial underpinnings of a program over short-term or recent success.
National TV Value (15 points) As with the Football Brand Value category, there is much more weight on programs with longer histories of being national TV draws as opposed to the flavors of the moment.
Local TV Value (10 points) – 10 points will be granted to a top 25 market, 7 points to a 26-50 market, 3 point to a 51-75 market, and then 0 points after that.
Demographics/Recruiting Value (20 points) – The word “demographics” is really a code word for a very tangible concern for football fans and coaches: football recruits.
Academics (5 points) – 5 points will be assigned to any school that has at least 2 of the following 3 qualifications: an AAU member, ranked in the top 100 of the US News undergraduate rankings and/or ranked in the top 300 of the ARWU world graduate school rankings. A school that has 1 of those qualifications will receive 3 points.
Basketball Value (5 points) – An elite program and/or fan base will receive 5 points and a solid program and/or school with a fair amount of tradition will get 3 points.
Geographic Fit/Need (5 points) –schools in states that are located within that gap along with other states immediately adjacent to the current Big 12 footprint will receive 5 points, while everyone else will receive zero.
Tremendous Upside Potential/Monopoly Power (10 points) –As a result, much like an unpolished prospect with a lot of athleticism in the NFL or NBA draft, the upside potential of a school should be taken into consideration by the Big 12. This is especially true for a school that could potentially have “monopoly power” of being the only power conference program in its home state. Other factors include whether a school is a flagship or academically elite, has a proven basketball fan base, or has made a lot of recent investments in football facilities.

CL82: These criteria are great insight into Frank's mindset, but probably not so much regarding the Big 12's analysis. 45% (the first two criteria) is history. I doubt anyone else is weighting that factor so much.

Frank's interpretation of demographics as "recruiting grounds" is tortured. Why just list "recruiting grounds" as it's own criteria. Connecticut does quite well on "demographics" but quite poorly on recruiting grounds.

So 65% of Frank's matrix has bias against us. I suspect that is why he created the last category as a kind of a "plug" giving value back to basketball and potential to move us up in the analysis. People accept that Connecticut is in play, so a matrix that ranked us as non-competitive would be suspect.

CONNECTICUT
Football Brand Value – 20
National TV Value – 10
Local TV Value – 7
Demographics/Recruiting Value – 0
Academics – 5
Basketball Value – 5
Geographic Fit/Need – 0
Tremendous Upside Potential/Monopoly Power – 10
Total: 57
Overview: In a vacuum, UConn is arguably the most power conference-like school that isn’t in a power conference today. If this were an ACC Expansion Index, then UConn would be close to a perfect score. Frankly, there’s still a part of me that’s surprised that UConn isn’t in the ACC already, but I perfectly understand why Louisville got the nod last year. The problem with the prospect of UConn going to the Big 12 is that it’s not a good fit for what the conference is seeking in expansion. UConn has actually performed aptly in football over the past decade outside of the last couple of years, yet the New England region is a black hole when it comes for football recruiting (particularly considering how it’s a high population area) and the school’s men’s and women’s basketball prowess probably has the least value to the Big 12 out of any of the power conferences (as hoops mainly benefit conferences that either have networks like the Big Ten has or strong basketball syndication deals like the ACC). Now, UConn’s Big East pedigree and relatively strong brand name means that the school has a large amount of upside, but it may not matter to the Big 12 with Connecticut being so far geographically from the conference’s core.

ConnHuskBask · May 9, 2016

I thought Frank the Tank posted that a couple years ago.

Tulane over UConn was something I specifically remembered.

Marty Jackson · May 9, 2016

huskymedic said:
frankthetank111 11:42am via Twitter Web Client
I've long seen BYU and Cincinnati as the top *realistic* Big 12 options. UConn is strong if geography doesn't matter. The Big 12 Expansion Index: Wake Me Up When It’s All Over

Frank has been a visitor in the past on this board, and even then I'm not exactly sure where he stands on Uconn.
But before liking this, it's worth noting he has Tulane ranked ahead of Uconn.

huskymedic · May 9, 2016

ConnHuskBask said:
I thought Frank the Tank posted that a couple years ago.

Tulane over UConn was something I specifically remembered.

It was - He re-posted. No new info.

noeynox · May 9, 2016

ConnHuskBask said:
I thought Frank the Tank posted that a couple years ago.

Tulane over UConn was something I specifically remembered.

To give you an idea on how,old it is, he has ville picked over UCONN "last year".

businesslawyer · May 9, 2016

I don't understand any of this last discussion. If a conference network is not in play, of course we're not going to the Big XII. That is why we never thought we were going to the Big XII until the conversation changed to "how do we get a network."

HuskyHawk · May 9, 2016

ConnHuskBask said:
I thought Frank the Tank posted that a couple years ago.

Tulane over UConn was something I specifically remembered.

That was based on the B1G criteria. This is slightly modified.

HuskyHawk · May 9, 2016

businesslawyer said:
I don't understand any of this last discussion. If a conference network is not in play, of course we're not going to the Big XII. That is why we never thought we were going to the Big XII until the conversation changed to "how do we get a network."

Here is where I slightly disagree. I think expansion happens, or is announced, even if no network is being announced at the same time. But the Big 12 has to consider strongly how each candidate would contribute to a network, since that is the future goal. My gut tells me this is where they are right now. That's why my current prediction is (a) expand with UConn and Cinci soon and (b) later...announce a network, and perhaps add two teams for football only (one of which is BYU). I think they know they can't wait until the B12N is ironed out to start inviting teams for expansion. I think that's why the spread the message about helping with a playoff so widely last week. It was the one thing they made public.

businesslawyer · May 9, 2016

HuskyHawk said:
Here is where I slightly disagree. I think expansion happens, or is announced, even if no network is being announced at the same time. But the Big 12 has to consider strongly how each candidate would contribute to a network, since that is the future goal. My gut tells me this is where they are right now. That's why my current prediction is (a) expand with UConn and Cinci soon and (b) later...announce a network, and perhaps add two teams for football only (one of which is BYU). I think they know they can't wait until the B12N is ironed out to start inviting teams for expansion. I think that's why the spread the message about helping with a playoff so widely last week. It was the one thing they made public.

Perfectly rational. But personally, there is so little reason for the Big XII to want UConn if it doesn't lead directly to a network, I'd be very surprised if we get invited without an announcement about a network if not simultaneously immediately afterward.

AZHuskiePop · May 9, 2016

In posts just after the Louisville add ( Frank ) who puts great stock in tradition. (I call him the Metternich of CR.)
proceeded to Rip UConn's short history in BCS football comparing it unfavorably with Tulane,and Kansas. If you've been on a big stage for 70 years your bound to have some Successfull ones.
I've always been hopeful of a B1G seat but have been pretty well beaten down by him.
But he told us to hold out hope that the Big 12 could add us.
I suggested Cinncy,and possibly BYU were more likely.
He hadn't even thought of either until that post.
That's well before any discussion of a conference network.
Yes without a B12 or ACC network
We're isolated from the former and blackballed by the latter
With a network we become a important get for the Big 12 and defensive must for the ACC.

CoastAtlantic · May 9, 2016

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 13m13 minutes ago
And now the in-fighting at Oklahoma because the board wants the B12 to fail.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
OU has a landing spot in SEC and several board members want this to happen. Boren doesn't.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 10m10 minutes ago
WVU has the same landing spot as well but our board is solidly behind Gee and want the B12 to prosper.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
If Boren resigns we can kiss expansion and eventually the B12 goodbye.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
SEC is not a good fit for OU culturally or athletically. WVU is a better fit culturally for SEC but not athletically.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
Fans of both schools better hope Boren stands his ground.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
As should the rest of the B12 not named UT

Joe Niro ‏@joekarenn 11m11 minutes ago
@MH ver3 SEC would take us?

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 10m10 minutes ago
@joekarenn they almost did before. If we came with OU it is assured.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 6m6 minutes ago
And OKST better hope Boren gets a handle on this or they could see the end of their partnership with OU

Frank ‏@mugtang 12m12 minutes ago
@MH ver3 why wouldn't WVU want to go to the SEC? Seems like a better move, IMO.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
@mugtang would we really want to be one of the smallest fish in the biggest pond?

TheFrogCast ‏@TheFrogCastTCU 9m9 minutes ago
@MH ver3 @mugtang it would be only one of two states without boatloads of talent within 100 miles.

Frank ‏@mugtang 11m11 minutes ago
@MH ver3 that's a fair point. But it's substantially more money.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
@mugtang we don't run a dirty enough fb program to even hope to compete.

Frank ‏@mugtang 11m11 minutes ago
@MH ver3

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
@mugtang it wasn't really a joke though

Frank ‏@mugtang 10m10 minutes ago
@MH ver3 I know...that's why it's funny. The $EC represents everything wrong in college football.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 9m9 minutes ago
@mugtang I'd rather see us in the ACC or B10 before the Sec.

Frank ‏@mugtang 8m8 minutes ago
@MH ver3 the ACC is a good conference. Schools with common interests, a relatively regional conference.

Jay Pritchard ‏@columbiasooner 14m14 minutes ago
@MH ver3 As a Sooner fan I agree with you somewhat on culturally but don't get the athletically comment.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 13m13 minutes ago
@columbiasooner in regards to FB OU runs too clean of a program

Jay Pritchard ‏@columbiasooner 11m11 minutes ago
@MH ver3 Ah. Gotcha. Having lived through the horrid 90's after an awesome 80's I appreciate a clean program.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 13m13 minutes ago
OU needs to get their house in order and fast.

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
And OKST better hope Boren gets a handle on this or they could see the end of their partnership with OU

King, Jeff ‏@JeffLurking 11m11 minutes ago
@MH ver3 No one says it, but did you notice that quote by Weitzenhoffer kind of implies that OU would be too spent to play in a Natty?

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 11m11 minutes ago
@JeffLurking indeed

King, Jeff ‏@JeffLurking 10m10 minutes ago
@MH ver3 Glad I'm not the only one who noticed. I thought it was pretty glaring!

Chad Rice ‏@chad_rice 3m3 minutes ago
@MH ver3 Small talk I've heard is that OSU will have a spot in SEC b/c of OSU president's relationship w/ Boren... Not sure if I believe it

Ricky Dixon ‏@RickyD224 12m12 minutes ago
@MH ver3 wvu is never going to SEC..like i told you in 1990..2005..2010..anytime

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
@RickyD224 had Mizzou opted to stay in B12 WVU would've been in the SEC. Sorry but it's true.

Ricky Dixon ‏@RickyD224 10m10 minutes ago
@MH ver3 yea i know how "true" ur predictions are..but not a chance..SEC only vetted WVU once in 1990 and said no way

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
UT only wants the B12 to stay strong and viable. They do not want Indy or another conf. OU needs to

MH ver3 ‏@MH ver3 12m12 minutes ago
OU needs to do the same.

Dennis DoddVerified account‏@dennisdoddcbs
David Boren could have a fight on his hands in B12 expansion — from his own board.

Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 1h1 hour ago
Greg Flugaur Retweeted Dennis Dodd

https://mobile.twitter.com/dennisdoddcbs/status/729715743307145218… Horse n Buggy Ideology has a hold everywhere in the Big 12.

Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 1h1 hour ago
We should all thank OU Regent Max Weitzenhoffer for his public statements...it show us the depth of emptiness within "status quo" faction.

Jake Trotter ‏@Jake_Trotter 1h1 hour ago
Spoke to OU board chair Max Weitzenhoffer, as well. He said, “I just don't feel expansion is in the best interest of our football program."

Geoffrey Mitchell ‏@geoffmitchell 1h1 hour ago
@flugempire that's his way of saying kill the B12

Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 1h1 hour ago
@geoffmitchell Yep. Same OU Regent does not like playoffs... It's the old guard. He can't stop Boren...so it's a 1 day story at best.

RedDirtSport ‏@RedDirtSport 1h1 hour ago
The dude is saying just kill the league so i'll give a nod for that but still..

Dooley ‏@DooleyMcStitch 1h1 hour ago
Dooley Retweeted Jake Trotter

B12 schools better be updating those CR resumes. No expansion = no B12 in the next 5 years.

Greg Welch ‏@ArtDirectorBYU 46m46 minutes ago
What's going to be really funny is when Texas agrees to convert the Longhorn Network into ACCNet as a condition of joining.

Andrew Carter ‏@_andrewcarter 25m25 minutes ago
Just heard applause in the ACC TV meeting. Probably means that league has signed that billion-dollar rights deal. Unconfirmed, at this time.

Greg Flugaur ‏@flugempire 4m4 minutes ago
Greg Flugaur Retweeted Andrew Carter

https://mobile.twitter.com/_andrewcarter/status/729737673187991552… This is sarcasm by the way....

ME: Stop! Panic Time! (cue MC Hammer music)

don356 · May 9, 2016

The trustee for Oklahoma basically shows all you need to know about why the b12 is in trouble and so far behind the b10 and sec. He understands building athletic conferences and media rights about like a high school student. These guys basically think they are going to get handed ferraris. It's easy to see why others have left. They have the creative entrepreneurial vision of a group of 8th graders.

Charley Horse · May 9, 2016

CallMeBruce said:
I'm not going to get into the other stuff, but as far as this goes, I think his suggestion was the UT would play all of its other sports in the ACC while going independent in football, ND-style.

Ahh.... I bet you're right. D'oh! Why didn't I see that?

billybud · May 9, 2016

Don't you think it was the Chair of the BOT giving his President a tug on the leash...sort of saying, "Hey...you report to us and I will not be a wallflower".

I see an ego clash between Boren and his BOT Chair. They are of a similar age and Boren has been putting himself up front in the CR discussions..

Just a little pull on the leash to remind him of his BOT.

CoastAtlantic · May 9, 2016

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 6h6 hours ago
Pay attention to what happens in the ACC meetings.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 6h6 hours ago
Big 12 Update: Expansion lacks the votes necessary. Network still an option but Texas a hard sell.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
@timbrando says the ACC network is coming. Others say ESPN would rather pony up the cash and not do ACCN.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
A network is just as important for the ACC as it is for the Big 12. ACC has the advantage in that Texas is in the Big 12.

Eric Ruby ‏@hoorayforeric 6h6 hours ago
@theDudeofWV I wouldn't put too much on Chuck Carlton's article. Just sayin'.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 6h6 hours ago
@hoorayforeric I'm just saying you have no idea.

Eric Ruby ‏@hoorayforeric 6h6 hours ago
@theDudeofWV you don't either at this point. B12 didn't spend thousands on research to throw it out & rely on politics & geographical bias

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 6h6 hours ago
@hoorayforeric Ha! You actually said that! Stop for a second and think about the conference we are talking about. I'll let you retract.

Eric Ruby ‏@hoorayforeric 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV Haha, true. But to research and stick w/their "good ol'" connections, doesn't make sense. But then again, B12 be B12.

Christopher Lambert‏@theDudeofWV
@hoorayforeric Right now it's all Texas. Texas doesn't care if KSU or WVU have a 10% better chance at making the playoffs with expansion.

Eric Ruby ‏@hoorayforeric 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV correction Texas be Texas.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
@hoorayforeric Because Texas believes, maybe rightly so, that if they win the Big 12 they make the playoffs. Because they are the Longhorns.

Scott Moore ‏@CoachSM 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV @TimBrando I hear ACC may be wanting to wait and see what happens with all the cable cutting going on if there a different way

Christopher Lambert‏@theDudeofWV
@CoachSM @TimBrando My opinion is this: it's a network or bust for the both the Big 12 and ACC. Not in 3 years. Not in 5. Get moving now.

Scott Moore ‏@CoachSM 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV @TimBrando devils advocate: what if the networks are going away and online subscription services come about ESPN laying off

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
@CoachSM @TimBrando I don't buy that. ESPN is on slingbox now. You can get LHN on a gaming device.

Scott Moore ‏@CoachSM 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV @TimBrando I've always heard you don't want to be the first or the last to do something and big12/ACC would be last to market

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
@CoachSM @TimBrando Distribution may change but as long as the content is market-pull it will be profitable.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 5h5 hours ago
@CoachSM I would.

Scott Moore ‏@CoachSM 4h4 hours ago
@theDudeofWV Me too! I almost wonder if starting one and tying it to ESPN3 wouldn't be a better idea with the way technology is going

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 4h4 hours ago
@theDudeofWV @CoachSM I cut my @DIRECTV off in January only have very basic service now. Tired of paying 130 per month for a few hours watch

sam s ‏@huskiesnyc 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV think they might be proactive for once and snatch up UConn before the Big 12 does?

Christopher Lambert‏@theDudeofWV
@huskiesnyc No. ACC has no interest in expanding. It's far larger than it should be already

sam s ‏@huskiesnyc 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV it makes sense for them to add one if ND is forced to join all sports.

Raymond Greenbriar ‏@RedmanCincy 5h5 hours ago
@theDudeofWV Finally getting rid of Boston College?

Christopher Lambert‏@theDudeofWV
@RedmanCincy Never said that...but I would... and Wake. Instantly increase revenues. Does anybody in Boston care about BC or the ACC?

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
This --->
There's infighting at Oklahoma over potential Big 12 expansion - CBSSports.com

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV two very rich men who don't want to piss off their business ties in Austin

Christopher Lambert‏@theDudeofWV
@snoopdoug44 And to think some believe the Big 12 has already made a decision.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV old school dudes. Clay Bennett had no problem 'stealing' and NBA Team though lol. Not really NBA knew they were going to OKC

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 Boren doesn't need his board's approval. Reagents just want to vent.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV they love Boren for the most part

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 There is a growing segment in the Big 12 who are starting to really smell expansion now that it may be close.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV yep for sure Dude

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 ESPN definitely wants the LHN albatross gone. If the ACC doesn't get a network then the Big 12 could be more attractive.

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 If I were Bowlsby and Boren I would wait and see what happens with the ACCN.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV I mostly agree. I don't want to wait but seems like the smart Thing

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 It's like when you buy a new bike and then a better bike comes out that's maybe on clearance. Just wait a few months...

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV oh god I've done that a few times. Man I hate that

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV and maybe they don't want Boren to commit long term to Big12 ?????

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 Truth is it would be easier to leave IF the Big 12 had 12. Less damage to the Big 12.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV that's been my take too but then OU and WVU would be the bad guys

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 I don't think anybody is happy with the candidates. OU's reagents just said what the others are thinking.

The Bad Guy ‏@snoopdoug44 2h2 hours ago
@theDudeofWV that is probably true. I'm like you. One day lets just expand and the next I'm like meh only with the right schools

Christopher Lambert ‏@theDudeofWV 2h2 hours ago
@snoopdoug44 Expansion is just a means to a network. That's my opinion.

CoastAtlantic · May 9, 2016

CallMeBruce · May 9, 2016

Wait, did he really write a legal opinion of the GOR?

businesslawyer · May 9, 2016

CallMeBruce said:
Wait, did he really write a legal opinion of the GOR?

When someone writing that the GORs are enforceable even where you don't have to pay the departing school for their games actually tells me how that works under antitrust and other laws encouraging free competition, wake me up. He spent a huge amount of time stating the obvious and unimportant (which basically boiled down to a grant of rights is enforceable because it's a contract and contracts are generally enforceable). Yawn.

CallMeBruce · May 9, 2016

businesslawyer said:
When someone writing that the GORs are enforceable even where you don't have to pay the departing school for their games actually tells me how that works under antitrust and other laws encouraging free competition, wake me up.

Please explain, and remember, IANAL.

Non-Key Tweets

CL82

NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions

Charley Horse

UConnJim

dwalks93

CallMeBruce

huskymedic

CL82

NCAA Woman's Basketball National Champions

ConnHuskBask

Shut Em Down!

Marty Jackson

huskymedic

noeynox

businesslawyer

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.

businesslawyer

AZHuskiePop

CoastAtlantic

don356

Charley Horse

billybud

CoastAtlantic

CoastAtlantic

CallMeBruce

businesslawyer

CallMeBruce

Online statistics

Share This Page

Forum statistics