- Joined
- Feb 7, 2012
- Messages
- 6,093
- Reaction Score
- 28,284
Or tv execs.Texas politics means nothing to Boren and OU.
Or tv execs.Texas politics means nothing to Boren and OU.
I agree. In my heart of hearts i'm hoping we supplant Cincinnati as 11, then from there que sera, sera. I have to believe from a conference network perspective we may be the best overall choice. Sure we have factors working against us as well. Fingers crossed.I like that Boren has specifically said that research has to rule the decision. This may be directed at anyone looking at Houston. My only fear is that Texas gets pressure to push for Houston. Oklahoma and the others may not like it, but they'd take Houston if it meant they'd get expansion and a network (kind of like the ACC BBall teams caving to the FBall schools). We may have supporters (like we did in the ACC), but I don't think we have anyone that would come out shooting for us. I wish it was ESPN, but I don't think we can count on them. We seem to be in a good spot right now, but we've seen that change before.
Texas politics means nothing to Boren and OU.
Boren doesn't have to compromise. He has as many options as Texas. That's what this is partially about. It's a power play by Boren to get on an even playing field with Texas. If they don't oblige, Boren is gone to just as green pastures.Perhaps not, but if Texas decides that the only way it will agree on the LHN and expansion is if one of the expansion adds is Houston, Boren and Oklahoma might compromise.
Of course, that could result in Cincy getting bumped and UConn getting a bid along with Houston
Boren doesn't have to compromise. He has as many options as Texas. That's what this is partially about. It's a power play by Boren to get on an even playing field with Texas. If they don't oblige, Boren is gone to just as green pastures.
For Boren to compromise, the first team has to be byu or uconn. I am not sure they would even get a network adding cincy and Houston. A compromise with the second two teams would be only for a championship game with assurances that Ou is off to the sec or b1g when this current deal is up. To me, Texas has more to lose in that scenario than OU.That doesn't mean that he won't compromise. Getting a network, and expansion, and 1 of his 2 desired teams might be enough.
For Boren to compromise, the first team has to be byu or uconn. I am not sure they would even get a network adding cincy and Houston. A compromise with the second two teams would be only for a championship game with assurances that Ou is off to the sec or b1g when this current deal is up. To me, Texas has more to lose in that scenario than OU.That doesn't mean that he won't compromise. Getting a network, and expansion, and 1 of his 2 desired teams might be enough.
For Boren to compromise, the first team has to be byu or uconn. I am not sure they would even get a network adding cincy and Houston. A compromise with the second two teams would be only for a championship game with assurances that Ou is off to the sec or b1g when this current deal is up. To me, Texas has more to lose in that scenario than OU.
I like that Boren has specifically said that research has to rule the decision. This may be directed at anyone looking at Houston. My only fear is that Texas gets pressure to push for Houston. Oklahoma and the others may not like it, but they'd take Houston if it meant they'd get expansion and a network (kind of like the ACC BBall teams caving to the FBall schools). We may have supporters (like we did in the ACC), but I don't think we have anyone that would come out shooting for us. I wish it was ESPN, but I don't think we can count on them. We seem to be in a good spot right now, but we've seen that change before.
All this smoke saying UConn is getting a lifeline is giving me an eerie sense of deja vu. We heard all this in 2012 and those rumors had us going to a basketball-centric league in our general geographical area.
BYU presents other problems, namely the no competition on Sundays thing.I can see it now. OU suggests us, Texas suggests Houston and they meet in the middle with BYU. CR rule #1
Boren doesn't have to compromise. He has as many options as Texas. That's what this is partially about. It's a power play by Boren to get on an even playing field with Texas. If they don't oblige, Boren is gone to just as green pastures.
Lets assume the big 12 implodes. OU goes to the SEC. Lets assume Texas goes to the ACC with a sweetheart deal similar to ND. I am really not sure that is sustainable for Texas. On top of that, they will be sandwiched by SEC money in OU and Texas A&M. They really can evolve(regress) to being the third wheel in that region. In my opinion, Texas needs the Big12 and OU far more than vice versa.You post as if you are sure. Do you have a source that we should know about? Is this a 'Key' discussion.![]()
BYU presents other problems, namely the no competition on Sundays thing.
I agree. The only thing that truly comes into play is if BYU makes it to the basketball conference finals which is currently on a Sunday. Other than that, good scheduling can get around Sundays.Ehhh. That can all be worked around. I think that's way overblown. They haven't been competing on Sundays forever and the MWC found a way to accommodate them. WCC does now. At worst, they assure a BXII conference network has better ratings on weeknights if they play basketball on a Monday rather than Sunday.
I agree. The only thing that truly comes into play is if BYU makes it to the basketball conference finals which is currently on a Sunday. Other than that, good scheduling can get around Sundays.
Not a tweet and technically not non-key in source (but no new key information), and didn't want to start a new thread:
http://www.houstonpress.com/news/bi...sity-of-houston-on-outside-looking-in-8165919
BIG XII EXPANSION RUMORS HAVE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON ON OUTSIDE LOOKING IN
UConn brings the northeast marketplace, another solid TV story (the Huskies are bigger in New York than Rutgers, who parlayed geography into a Big Ten invite) and wildly successful basketball programs, men's and women's.
Texas politics means nothing to Boren and OU.
Texas politics due matter, just ask Colorado Nebraska & A&M. Should political forces force the XII to throw Houston a lifeline versus UConn, it means that Oklahoma is likely off to the SEC or B1G within the next decade followed by Kansas to the B1G and OK St to the SEC. That loss diminishes the value of the XII greatly and will likely drive Texas to another conference, also.
I feel like this is like what we faced before the ACC took Louisville. We all were dismissing Louisville as an option because their academics were sub par and they didn't match anything the ACC wanted (based on our beliefs). Then BAM! We're here and they are P5. We all keep dismissing BYU over the Sunday issue but seeing CR Rule #1, we'll be so confident we're in as more info gets out and then BAM! We'll be where we started, in the AAC.....BYU presents other problems, namely the no competition on Sundays thing.