New PAC-12 Forming | Page 32 | The Boneyard

New PAC-12 Forming

LOL, Creighton is better than Gonzaga. On what planet did they out perform Creighton?

Marquette < SanDiego State. Unless it’s 1977. Then you are right. When did Marquette last make the national championship game? Was it 1976 or 77?

Villanova has fallen off a cliff since their hall of fame coach retired. Not unexpected. But just a fact.

And I said UConn was better, so we agree on that.
Advanced. That's the key word. They have.

Winning a championship is better than getting to a championship once in a million years.

But you're right on Marquette, Shaka Smart sucks. You're right on that one.
 
If you're covering a period long enough to claim Nova's two recent titles, Gonzaga has significantly outperformed Creighton in the tournament.

If you're limiting the period to the recent years where Creighton has outperformed Gonzaga, Villanova has been outperformed by Utah St.

Scoot's argument contains quite a bit of puffery but the are some kernals of truth in it.
We're com paring the whole league for heaven's sake. This is the most ridiculous argument
 
LOL, Creighton is better than Gonzaga. On what planet did they out perform Creighton?

Marquette < SanDiego State. Unless it’s 1977. Then you are right. When did Marquette last make the national championship game? Was it 1976 or 77?

Villanova has fallen off a cliff since their hall of fame coach retired. Not unexpected. But just a fact.

And I said UConn was better, so we agree on that.
Quit while your behind. Being willing to sacrifice the whole athletic department for this PAC 12 is certainly an argument that no sane UConn fan would make
 
Quit while your behind. Being willing to sacrifice the whole athletic department for this PAC 12 is certainly an argument that no sane UConn fan would make
I’m not advocating that at all. I’m saying the PAC is seeking to become the non P4 power conference in basketball, a position currently held by the New Big East. I think the combination of members plus having a football league could enable them to succeed. I’m not convinced that the P2, never mind the P4 want more than 1 non-P4 basketball league. So I think this model could supplant the NEWBE. They will be the best G5 football league and a power hoop league. I don’t see a NEWBE program stepping up long term and we have 2 awful ones.
 
Doesn't the PAC have a war chest of exit fee monies that new teams can have access to?
That depends on jow OSU and WSU feel about parting with it. I would definitely invest some of that money if the result was a viable conference .
They should have about $200million
I could see spending a good hunk of that .?
 
.-.
AI has made fantasy real estate ultra inexpensive to fabricate. 'Here, have a stadium drawing - don't cost nuttin.'
Yeah… I read this this morning:


-> Q: With that, is there a budget? Is there a number right now?

Orr: A cost estimate? We're working on that. We released yesterday some very preliminary schematic conceptual designs, and that gives an idea of the type of stadium we're considering. There are some tweaks and some more work we're going to need to continue to work on and tighten that up. Once we have a design that we feel comfortable with, we will get to the hard estimate and finance it.

Q: I buy a car; I know how much it costs. I buy a home; I know how much it costs. I buy a stadium.... Do you guys have any kind of ballpark number for where your range is looking?

Orr: Yeah, I would say we obviously know just from comparables within the state of California what a what a 25,000-seat stadium costs. And quite frankly, I'll give you an example. San Diego State built one. Now there was 35,000 seats and theirs was just between 250 and $300 million at that at the end of the day. So, I'm not sure exactly where ours would fall. We're looking at 25,000. Again, we'll get to the schematics and getting to the details and have a number.

We are confident that we will have the funding mechanisms in place. The funding mechanisms are not university general funds that are going to take away from academic programs or our student programs on campus. These are all dedicated funds for athletics and with those funds, and since we announced the stadium, we've gotten so much additional support of folks out in the Sacramento community who want to help, who want to contribute. So, I have no doubts this will be funded, and it will happen. <-
 
I think their media deal is key. If it is better or equal to the AAC, it is probly going to be attractive to UNLV, Memphis then us as football only. Maybe USF and another Eastern school too.
 
I think their media deal is key. If it is better or equal to the AAC, it is probly going to be attractive to UNLV, Memphis then us as football only. Maybe USF and another Eastern school too.
Keep up. We are not doing anything until B12 decides our fate
 
I’m not advocating that at all. I’m saying the PAC is seeking to become the non P4 power conference in basketball, a position currently held by the New Big East. I think the combination of members plus having a football league could enable them to succeed. I’m not convinced that the P2, never mind the P4 want more than 1 non-P4 basketball league. So I think this model could supplant the NEWBE. They will be the best G5 football league and a power hoop league. I don’t see a NEWBE program stepping up long term and we have 2 awful ones.
How? They have SDSU and Gonzaga. That’s a power play?
 
.-.
I think their media deal is key. If it is better or equal to the AAC, it is probly going to be attractive to UNLV, Memphis then us as football only. Maybe USF and another Eastern school too.

Their media deal is going to be garbage.

Boise, Idaho.
Corvallis, Oregon.
Pullman, Washington.
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Logan, Utah.
Fresno, California.
San Diego, California.

Basically, they’re going to market hoping someone is gonna give them $10M a year for the fifth-best program in California. Better learn Roku, buddies.
 
Their media deal is going to be garbage.

Boise, Idaho.
Corvallis, Oregon.
Pullman, Washington.
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Logan, Utah.
Fresno, California.
San Diego, California.

Basically, they’re going to market hoping someone is gonna give them $10M a year for the fifth-best program in California. Better learn Roku, buddies.
Ultimately that's why they're screwed to begin with. "Flavor" programs have no value in a hypermedia landscape
 
Ultimately that's why they're screwed to begin with. "Flavor" programs have no value in a hypermedia landscape

Right.

They took the two worst programs in the worst power conference and combined them with some mid-majors that the computers kinda liked last year even if no one else cared.

In terms of football, eh, kinda fun G5 conference, but nothing you need to see. In terms of basketball, the best you can do is Gonzaga vs San Diego State at 10 pm EST and literally no one is going to watch it.

The last Pac-12 could not get a linear deal. This one….good luck
 
Their media deal is going to be garbage.

Boise, Idaho.
Corvallis, Oregon.
Pullman, Washington.
Fort Collins, Colorado.
Logan, Utah.
Fresno, California.
San Diego, California.

Basically, they’re going to market hoping someone is gonna give them $10M a year for the fifth-best program in California. Better learn Roku, buddies.
Lincoln, Nebraska is just as remote as those places. AAC got nothing with schools in Dallas, Orlando, Cincinnati, Philly, etc. It's the school following, not location that matters. Why bring-up the geography?
 
Lincoln, Nebraska is just as remote as those places. AAC got nothing with schools in Dallas, Orlando, Cincinnati, Philly, etc. It's the school following, not location that matters. Why bring-up the geography?

Good god.

They’re freaking mid-majors in crap locations. They have no following and no markets.

Why is this so hard for people?
 
.-.
The new PAC is a G5 in PAC12 clothing.
About a dozen years ago I saw an episode of the US version of Top Gear.

In that episode one of the clowns bought a 30 year old Fiero and a kit that had fenders and a spoiler that could be bolted on to make it kind of resemble a Ferrari.

That's kind of what Oregon St & Washington St are attempting.
 
About a dozen years ago I saw an episode of the US version of Top Gear.

In that episode one of the clowns bought a 30 year old Fiero and a kit that had fenders and a spoiler that could be bolted on to make it kind of resemble a Ferrari.

That's kind of what Oregon St & Washington St are attempting.
This is what makes me infuriated at this new P12 vs. G8 proposal in that Ore St and Wash St get to leverage their also-ran status as a former Px to be part of the P12 yet UConn, which was part of the BCS automatic qualification group (a quasi P6 before the term P5 became in vogue), gets relegated to the G8. To be fair, USF was also relegated, but I would argue they don't have champsionship caliber teams unless you count "Coed cheer team" (not knocking cheerleading, but compared to football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, etcs, it's more of a performance competition). I'm grateful Wash St. gave us Drew Bledsoe that helped the Patriots begin their dynasty, but its ludricrous to lump them into power status when they were discarded similar to us (in that our former conference mates traded up into P5 status).
 
This is what makes me infuriated at this new P12 vs. G8 proposal in that Ore St and Wash St get to leverage their also-ran status as a former Px to be part of the P12 yet UConn, which was part of the BCS automatic qualification group (a quasi P6 before the term P5 became in vogue), gets relegated to the G8. To be fair, USF was also relegated, but I would argue they don't have champsionship caliber teams unless you count "Coed cheer team" (not knocking cheerleading, but compared to football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, etcs, it's more of a performance competition). I'm grateful Wash St. gave us Drew Bledsoe that helped the Patriots begin their dynasty, but its ludricrous to lump them into power status when they were discarded similar to us (in that our former conference mates traded up into P5 status).
Wasn't Temple also relegated?
 
This is what makes me infuriated at this new P12 vs. G8 proposal in that Ore St and Wash St get to leverage their also-ran status as a former Px to be part of the P12 yet UConn, which was part of the BCS automatic qualification group (a quasi P6 before the term P5 became in vogue), gets relegated to the G8. To be fair, USF was also relegated, but I would argue they don't have champsionship caliber teams unless you count "Coed cheer team" (not knocking cheerleading, but compared to football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, etcs, it's more of a performance competition). I'm grateful Wash St. gave us Drew Bledsoe that helped the Patriots begin their dynasty, but its ludricrous to lump them into power status when they were discarded similar to us (in that our former conference mates traded up into P5 status).
I mean, UConn, Temple, and USF were part of the group calling the shots in basically the same scenario, no?
 
.-.
This is what makes me infuriated at this new P12 vs. G8 proposal in that Ore St and Wash St get to leverage their also-ran status as a former Px to be part of the P12 yet UConn, which was part of the BCS automatic qualification group (a quasi P6 before the term P5 became in vogue), gets relegated to the G8. To be fair, USF was also relegated, but I would argue they don't have champsionship caliber teams unless you count "Coed cheer team" (not knocking cheerleading, but compared to football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, etcs, it's more of a performance competition). I'm grateful Wash St. gave us Drew Bledsoe that helped the Patriots begin their dynasty, but its ludricrous to lump them into power status when they were discarded similar to us (in that our former conference mates traded up into P5 status).

Why shouldn’t they?

They are paying a large part of the buyouts for four schools. It’s their show, they should get to dictate some terms.
 
Wasn't Temple also relegated?
I mean, UConn, Temple, and USF were part of the group calling the shots in basically the same scenario, no?
I didn't include Temple (perhaps somewhat arbitrarily) since they left the Big East after the 2004/2005 season and rejoined in the final 2012/2013 season (going independent then to the MAC in between); hence I went with continuity that USF had over Temple when the football Big East dissolved.
Why shouldn’t they?

They are paying a large part of the buyouts for four schools. It’s their show, they should get to dictate some terms.
They have a cache of money, it's true, but would you argue that OSU and WSU should be part of the 72 while we get nudged out? Cuz though they have better football now, we have better basketball and a stronger national brand because of it, yet we won't be getting on that life raft that they've been tossed.
 
This is what makes me infuriated at this new P12 vs. G8 proposal in that Ore St and Wash St get to leverage their also-ran status as a former Px to be part of the P12 yet UConn, which was part of the BCS automatic qualification group (a quasi P6 before the term P5 became in vogue), gets relegated to the G8. To be fair, USF was also relegated, but I would argue they don't have champsionship caliber teams unless you count "Coed cheer team" (not knocking cheerleading, but compared to football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, etcs, it's more of a performance competition). I'm grateful Wash St. gave us Drew Bledsoe that helped the Patriots begin their dynasty, but its ludricrous to lump them into power status when they were discarded similar to us (in that our former conference mates traded up into P5 status).
I agree and I am not trying to defend the PAC as a power conference. OSU and WSU are both currently 4-1. They have been members of the PAC for over 50 years. The PAC was the 2nd best conference last year behind the SEC by some measures, OSU was very good, and WSU just beat Washington. So to be fair, those two have earned some cred.
 

Video: Sac-State New Stadium and Other Uses

Where they are located, they are great for MWC or PAC-12. I am not sure why PAC-12 didn't go after San Jose State when they lost the Bay Area media markets with Stanford and Cal. San Jose State football has been improving, but they need more media coverage to get more locals interested. They have a significant attendance issue, too.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,379
Messages
4,569,340
Members
10,475
Latest member
Tunwin22


Top Bottom