I did not say they were responsible for maintenance. In fact I would be very surprised if they were. But UConn FB is the reason the Rent is there, they are the principal tenant, and if the rental agreement does not fully account for all the debt service and maintenance minus ancillary income, then that should properly go into the calculation. It just does not seem logical to me that in the amount of time the Rent has been there since completion in 2003 (right outside my office window), that UConn FB could have paid off the lion's share of debt service in the form of rent. Maybe their obligations to the state per their agreement, but not the lion's share of the debt service for the entire facility. I also think that the students are getting hit pretty hard to subsidize the program. But others would know more about that than me. And did they not LOSE money on even the Fiesta Bowl?