I'm amused and perhaps bemused that you folks and others are spending your time reading comments from those some call 'newbie' fans of Caitlin Clark. Who cares what they think or say?
We're smart enough to make out own judgments about how Caitlin is playing, or any other WNBA player.
As for the statement that Geno and Dawn ostensibly focus their programs to prepare their plays for the WNBA, you know very well that numerous former Huskies and Gamecocks have not made it in the pros, and there are plenty of others who barely hang on. Of course, both Geno and Dawn have cultivated the skills of some to be mega-stars, but they haven't been full proof.
As for your implied suggestion, baggerbob, that Lisa Bluder should have had her team play a different kind of game to better prep Caitlin for the pros, does it mean nothing to you that the Hawkeyes built a remarkable four-season run of successes during CC's time there, and she made meanwhile individual history in countless ways, all as by-products of Bluder's coaching.
Clark has challenges before her, and none of us knows how she's do as time goes on, but that's up to her (and her current coaches). Caitlin came out of Iowa's program as a classy, remarkably mature and incredibly accomplished college grad. That tells me Lisa Bluder was providing Caitlin with a darned good foundation for the inevitable hurdles to come.
GCKSFn4L, as one of those Huskies fans who also cheered for Iowa the past few years and now roots for Caitlin, Aliyah and their teammates to have some WNBA success, I'd much rather Caitlin score just 7 or 11 points and the Fever win than for her to have 30 in a defeat! If she were to score 30 and the Fever were to win, all the better.